Karger Loses Nomination, Wins Legal Ground
Fred Karger’s discrimination claim against conservation organization stands
Fred Karger may not have won the Republican nomination, but the openly gay, Jewish candidate has gained ground in his discrimination claim against the American Conservative Union Foundation. The claim, filed with the District of Columbia Office of Human Rights, alleges that Karger was denied a booth at the ACUF-run CPAC conference because he is gay.
The Huffington Post reports:
The ACUF tried to have the complaint dismissed, arguing that it doesn’t run CPAC — rather, the related but separate American Conservative Union does — and has a First Amendment right to chose who speaks at its events. The group also argued that its disagreement with Karger was over his support for gay marriage and not his own sexual orientation. Gustavo Velasquez, the Office of Human Rights’ director, rebuffed that argument, and found that “an investigation is warranted” into the causes of Karger’s exclusion from CPAC.
“Good news,” Karger said in a phone interview, “they stood up to the bullies.”
Fred Karger, Gay Republican Presidential Candidate, Wins Round 1 In Complaint Against CPAC [Huffington Post]
Related: Elder Statesman [Tablet Magazine]
Previous: Karger Has Biggest Victory in Puerto Rico
Karger’s Discrimination Claim Proceeds
Karger Alleges CPAC Discrimination
Uri Blau faces up to seven years in prison for having classified IDF documents
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.