Judaism, the Religion of Rules
A provocative blog post suggests a return to stringency
Professor Jack Wertheimer’s “Ten Commandments of America’s Jews,” presumably timed for Shavuot (which begins Saturday at sundown), is sure to make some people unhappy. His commandments are not things he approves of, and they point toward what he sees as American Jewry’s lax attitude toward the rules and codifiers that have made Judaism distinctive for a few millenniums running. “The betrayal of Jewish particularism is the most insidious consequence of that consensus. Jewish collective needs are minimized or kept at arm’s length even by those, including rabbis, who should be most concerned about the welfare of the Jewish people,” he complains. And he concludes: “Perhaps the time has come to take a fresh look at the original Ten Commandments, which open with a different I: the voice of a commanding God reminding a specific people of its particular historical experience and proceeding to issue judgmental commands and injunctions. That Decalogue, after all, has had a long shelf life, and is likely to outlast the self-defeating ten commandments of today’s American Jews.”
It’s a classic culture war salvo, but I’m disinclined to take the bait. While I doubt Wertheimer and I would agree on exactly how strict the lines that make something or someone Jewish need to be, or where exactly they are drawn, I agree with him that, generally, most people need to live their lives within certain boundaries, without the existence of which meaning (which many people need) cannot exist; and that when we give all individuals total autonomy to define for themselves something that ostensibly is larger than themselves and to which others belong, we cheapen everyone’s attachment. Does this mean we should excommunicate people who intermarry? Well, I would say no, not at all. But it does mean we’re allowed to discuss the subject (and I think we are, I don’t think that’s become “taboo,” as Wertheimer says), and the community is allowed to encourage mixed-religion couples raising Jewish children not to have Christmas trees, and so on.
To quote that great Jewish rabbi Noam Chomsky (whoops, there I go baiting people), “If anything could be possible, then nothing would be possible.” Or if you’d prefer the Jesuits’ formulation: “freedom through discipline.”
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at firstname.lastname@example.org. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.