Baz Luhrmann’s Meyer Wolfsheim
In new ‘The Great Gatsby’ film, Jewish mobster played by Bollywood star
The talk of the day is the new trailer for The Great Gatsby (below), whose true title, it appears, should probably be something more like Baz Luhrmann Presents The Great Gatsby, a Baz Luhrmann Joint by Baz Luhrmann, what with the omnipresence of the unmistakable stylistic and thematic tics associated with the Aussie director (think Moulin Rouge). It stars Tobey Maguire as Nick Carraway, Carey Mulligan as Daisy Buchanan, and Leonardo DiCaprio as the former James Gatz, and they all get ample screen time. But watch closely and you’ll see a far more swarthy actor in a dapper suit now and then. This is the Bollywood star Amitabh Bachchan, and he is playing none other than Meyer Wolfsheim, Fitzgerald’s fictionalized version of the real-life mobster Arnold Rothstein (both are Jews who fixed the World Series).
In the 1974 film starring Redford, Rothstein is portrayed by Howard Da Silva (remember the cardinal rule of cinema: Italians can play Jews, and James Caan can play Sonny Corleone), in what I seem to recall is a relatively by-the-book depiction. Fitzgerald’s Wolfsheim is a shockingly anti-Semitic caricature, even by 1925 standards, with a Yiddish accent, unsightly nose hairs, and, famously, cufflinks made of the “finest specimens of human molars.” What Lurhmann will do with him, I can scarcely imagine.
UPDATE: It’s been brought to my attention that Howard Da Silva was, in fact, born Howard Silverblatt.
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.