Egypt Heads to Polls Amid Uncertain Outcome
13 candidates, four frontrunners, (probably) two finalists
If you happen to know who is going to win Egypt’s presidential elections—whose first round is today and tomorrow—now is the time to find their equivalent of Intrade and place your bet, because nobody else really does. There’s a compelling logic behind comparatively moderate Islamist Abdel Moneim Aboul Fotouh being the leading candidate (Wael Ghonim, the Google employee who was a hero of the revolution, voted for him). Word is that former foreign minister Amr Moussa, further a moderate, is leading in the polls. The Muslim Brotherhood’s Mohammed Mursa is in fact leading in pre-filed absentee ballots (he can thank eligible voters in Saudi Arabia for that). And even Ahmed Shafik, who was of all things ex-President Hosni Mubarak’s final prime minister and is widely seen as the military’s favored candidate, has gained momentum.
Here’s the truth: even when we get the results next Tuesday (which is the day of reckoning according to this indispensable primer), we won’t know who Egypt’s next president will be: there will almost certainly not be a majority victory, which would throw the election to a second round, next month, between the top two vote-getters. (It’s like the recent French presidential elections, except in Egypt’s case, unlike in France’s, you can expect at least one candidate with an arguably anti-Semitic party to score better than third place.) I count six possible permutations, and even then we won’t know for another few weeks who will win.
So what do we know?
We know, as Amr Bargisi complains today in Tablet Magazine, that actual liberalism is basically off the table. We know that all the candidates are likely to press harder for the Palestinian cause than Mubarak did, at the least by insisting Israel adopt the “Arab peace initiative,” otherwise known as the 2002 Saudi plan, and that some of the candidates are unafraid to traffic in conspiracy theories and even anti-Semitism. We know that the eventual president will face a combination of constraints imposed by the military (which isn’t going anywhere), the Brotherhood-dominated parliament itself, the Brotherhood itself, and perhaps most of all (and for the very first time) actual constituents who worry about things like food and the role of Islam and, today it so happens, a crime epidemic. We know Aboul Fotouh—who, again, is the relatively moderate Islamist, albeit the one who has the hardcore Salafists’ backing—is a 9/11 Truther. We know, in short, that things are going to get bumpy, bumpier than they’ve been probably since February 2011, which itself was bumpier than they’d been in decades and decades.
Ultimately, it might be that Churchill line. The ouster of Mubarak, in hindsight, changed little practically, leaving aside its formidable effect on the region and the consciousness of Egypt’s 70 million citizens. However, politically speaking, it could be that this election will be not the end, or the beginning of the end, but perhaps the end of the beginning.
Presidential Elections Will Not End Egyptian Instability [The Washington Institute]
Brotherhood’s Candidate Tops Absentee Results [JPost]
Egypt’s Presidential Race Gets New Twist: Mubarak-Era Figure Surges [LAT]
Egypt’s Presidential Election: Facts About the Historic Post-Mubarak Vote [WP]
A New Presidential Authority in Egypt [CFR From the Potomac to the Euphrates]
Related: An Egyptian Democrat Gives Up
Earlier: Moderate Islamist Is Egyptian Frontrunner
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at firstname.lastname@example.org. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.