When the Cold War ended, most Americans happily forgot about the real possibility of nuclear annihilation. Ron Rosenbaum didn’t, and his new book argues that the risk is greater today than it’s ever been. A Vox Tablet conversation.
When the Soviet Union fell and the Cold War was declared over, most people happily forgot that tens of thousands of nuclear warheads were still poised to go off at a moment’s notice. Ron Rosenbaum is less complacent; he has become obsessed with the persistence of the threat of a nuclear attack, whether purposeful or accidental. (Nine countries have roughly 20,000 nuclear warheads, according to the Brookings Institution, and that figure accounts only for those weapons of which there is a record.) It’s a likelihood that is growing as unstable regimes race to acquire warheads of their own, he argues in his new book, How the End Begins: the Road to a Nuclear World War III, in which he examines the extent of this threat and looks for ways to resolve it. He spoke to Vox Tablet’s Sara Ivry about the obsolescence of deterrence in our geopolitically unstable world, the close calls in the history of the nuclear age, and the prospect of realizing President Barack Obama’s goal of eliminating nuclear weapons. [Running time: 16:55.]
Read an except from How the End Begins here.
An IDF vet with ‘a great sense of discomfort about my own personal behavior’ when he patrolled the Occupied Territories now leads a group called Breaking the Silence dedicated to exposing the messy work of occupation
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.