Your email is not valid
Recipient's email is not valid
Submit Close

Your email has been sent.

Click here to send another

Civil Blood

The central issue in the Middle East is not the Arab-Israeli peace process but the Arab civil war that has been reignited by the so-called Arab Spring

Print Email
A military personnel carrier in Al-Jesrain, Syria, on Monday, in a video still from Shaam News Network. (Shaam News Network/EPA)
Related Content

Cinders of Lebanon

The United States abandoned Beirut, and Israel takes the blame

The Western, Arab, and Israeli press have likened the Tel Aviv tent-city protests over housing and other social issues to the Arab Spring, but the reality is that they indicate how removed the Jewish state is from the region’s troubles. While Syrians and Libyans and Egyptians are forming tribal militias or being shot and bombed by their countries’ military and security forces, Israelis are pitching peaceful protest tents in front of television cameras.

The last six months of instability in the region have brought a period of relative quiet to Israel, during which time the country has been enjoying unprecedented economic prosperity and the luxury of looking at some of its real social problems—which is to say that Israel really is enjoying a sort of democratic springtime. However, in the Arabic-speaking states, all that’s blossoming is violent conflict, especially in Israel’s neighbor Syria.

The Syrian uprising is now almost six months old, and some observers in Beirut, where I spent the past week, think it might go on for years. Syrian President Bashar al-Assad is ratcheting up the violence and still has plenty of cards left to play. The opposition, for its part, has braved week after week of atrocities and shows no signs of backing down. Neither the regime nor its opponents are going anywhere, and neither the Obama Administration nor anyone else in the international community has the leverage or willpower to bring the issue to a conclusion, peaceful or otherwise.

Many Lebanese believe that the bloody standoff between Syria’s Alawite minority, which controls the army and security services, and the country’s Sunni majority will invariably worsen as the opposition there takes up arms. It’s little wonder that officials across Beirut’s political spectrum—from Druze leader Walid Jumblatt to Hezbollah, and from the Sunnis in the north to the Christians of the pro-democracy March 14 movement—fear that events in Syria will fuel Lebanon’s own simmering sectarian tensions.

Syria, in other words, is in the process of Lebanonization, referring not only to the madness of Lebanon’s 15-year civil war in the 1970s and ’80s but also its aftermath, which continues to the present. In this configuration, tribal factors, as well as local regional and international interests, will act as highly volatile elements of a political climate marked by violence or stalemate. In a Lebanonized Syria, as now in Lebanon, the state will not be able to function normally.

What we’ve watched the last six months across the Middle East is less a series of democratic uprisings—in which people stake their claims to individual liberties—than a series of battles in which tribes, sects, clans, and classes turn against the rivals that have humiliated them for so long. This is most obviously the model in Libya, Yemen, Bahrain, and Syria, but it also pertains to Egypt and Tunisia, where the military and security apparatuses are best understood as privileged networks imposing their will on the rest of society. The courage on display in these uprisings, especially in Syria, is no less impressive or human just because it is based on communal grievances rather than on notions of individual rights.

Lebanonization is the region’s real status quo, but it is also fundamentally unacceptable to the United States, the Middle East’s great power for over half a century. This is why Washington backed various dictatorships, most of them much less cruel than that of the Assads, when those dictatorships’ repression allowed their societies to function at some level like real states. America’s interests in the region are energy, trade, and, after Sept. 11, stopping the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. All of these interests are much harder to maintain and advance amid widespread conflict. Given the Obama Administration’s reluctance to take the lead in the Middle East, the entire region might well become Lebanonized, a scenario dangerous for U.S. interests and allies, including Israel.

The sectarian conflict at the heart of the Syrian uprising is precisely what the Assad family, Bashar and his father, Hafez, had fought to avoid for 40 years, and it was fear of this conflict that shaped the regime’s domestic and foreign policy. At home, there was Baathism, an ideology that subsumed sectarian difference under a totalitarian ideology similar in ways to both national socialism and communism.

In pre-Arab Spring Syria, few dared discuss minority issues, a taboo so powerful that it extends at present even to those most opposed to the regime’s physical and spiritual violence. Given the extensive brainwashing of many decades, it is too emotionally daunting for the opposition to push back the curtain and explain that they are being persecuted not as Syrians or human beings but simply as Sunnis.

To be sure, the opposition has extended its hand to the Alawites, but so far it’s not clear if many are accepting the invitation. A Lebanese activist recently relayed to me that a local Alawite official he’d just met explained that he had no choice but to side with Assad and was ready to defend his community against the Sunnis. When the Syrian navy shelled the Sunni neighborhoods of Lattakia this last weekend, there were reports that Alawites stood by cheering. If there were any Alawites prepared to cross communal boundaries, then surely the fate of a top Alawite official, Ali Habib, reminded the community where their allegiances should lie. The former defense minister was replaced last week, then either put under house arrest or, according to some reports, executed by the regime when word got out that he was someone to whom the Turks or Americans might reach out.

The White House fears the uncertainty that would likely follow Assad’s demise, but it’s pretty clear what would follow the present regime—not the specter of a Muslim Brotherhood takeover of the state but the ghost of Syria pre-Assad: an endless series of coups and counter-coups, which in the past ended only when Hafez al-Assad took the reins in 1970. The one-time air force officer and defense minister recognized that some of Syria’s instability grew out of its neighbors’ ability to cause problems in Damascus. The way to keep Syria’s rivals, like Egypt, Jordan, Iraq, and Israel, in check was to go on the offensive. Sponsoring terrorism against its neighbors was a primary method by which the Assad regime ensured peace at home.

By exporting sectarian conflict abroad, primarily to Lebanon and most recently to Iraq, Syria’s ruling class deterred the domestic sectarian conflict that would have cost the Alawite regime power and the community its lives. All of the regime’s efforts, at home and abroad, were wrapped in the banner of Arabism, the war to liberate Jerusalem and eradicate the Zionist entity.

The Assad regime can no longer afford the luxury of ideology, which is why it shelled a Palestinian camp on the Mediterranean coast over the weekend, sending thousands of refugees scattering. The Palestinians are simply one card in a much bigger Middle East poker game (a game in which, it should be noted, Israel doesn’t have a seat at the table). The central issue in the region is not the Arab-Israeli peace process but the Arab civil war that has been reignited under the ultimately cynical label of Arab Spring.

Israel has very little to do with current turmoil in the Middle East, a fact made plain by the paranoid nature of Arab propaganda, which blames Jerusalem for backing Arab dictatorships while accusing Israel of plotting to set the Arabs at each other’s throats. But while Lebanon’s civil wars made clear that Israel does not profit from Arab conflict, it also suggests that the Jewish state will invariably become a proxy in someone else’s war, which will not be to Israel’s benefit. Nor is there any upside, strategic or moral, in Israel pursuing the policy of an alliance of minorities and aligning itself, as some Israeli analysts have called for, with minority regimes like Assad’s that massacre their own people in the streets.

There’s something to be said for the longstanding claims of its enemies that Israel doesn’t really belong in the Middle East. How does a modern neoliberal democracy fit with the rest of the region, as it looks now? So far, Israel has managed to keep its head down. For the time being, Israel’s neighbors seem to have forgotten about it. But that quiet can’t last for long.

Print Email

Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180

Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.

Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.

We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.

jacob arnon says:

There was an attack in Eilat that originated in Sinai and left between 4 to 6 dead.

I hope this doesn’t mean that Egypt will join Gaza in becoming another launching pad for terrorist attacks on Israelis.

So much for the Cairo “spring.”

These “peaceful” tent protestors and demonstrators, a majority of them, have served in the IDF in the Occupied Territories and are the same people who shoot at or conduct raids on Palestinian homes. Some of them help run the prisons where roughly 8,000 Palestinians are incarcerated without ever having received a civilian trial. Far from being the peaceful agents of democracy. Their beef is not with the fundamental evil the country is founded upon — Apartheid policies — and the freedoms it deprives its Arab minority and the millions under their thumb in the territories, but with the cost of their rent. Me, me, me, me, me. You’re absolutely right. It’s nothing like the Arab Spring.

Lansing Reed says:

David (if that is your name) – are you off your meds today? Just asking.

jacob arnon says:

“David’s” problem is that he lives in a cave and watches a TV with only one channel, al Jazeera.

Rosen says:

David you are a case.

The protesters fought for their homeland and did their best to stop yout suicide bomber friends from blowing up and murdering their children.

But what would an antisemite like you care about reality? To you the Jew is always guilty.

Ilan RIchards says:

Arab-Spring is not Prague-Spring and anyone who thinks that it has or will with no doubt lead to democratization needs to think a bit more deeply. Still if it leads to even one fair and open election and a commitment to civil liberties in even one Arab country it would be a good thing. Also no one will miss Ghadaffi or Assad even if their replacements will be no better.

jay glass says:

David is obviously a ignoramous and Jew-hater,and based on his own warped delusions

jacob arnon says:

“There’s something to be said for the longstanding claims of its enemies that Israel doesn’t really belong in the Middle East. How does a modern neoliberal democracy fit with the rest of the region, as it looks now? So far, Israel has managed to keep its head down. For the time being, Israel’s neighbors seem to have forgotten about it. But that quiet can’t last for long.”

This is like saying that the US didn’t belong in the Americas or anywhere else in the early 19c being the only democracy in the world.

The world changes (it too more than a century but it changed) and even if it hadn’t the US would still have survived.

I agree though that Arabs have been fighting each other for centuries but that doesn’t mean that Israel doesn’t belong there.

Ezekiel says:

Thank you, Lee, for point out how healthy Israeli society is. It shines not only in comparison to its dysfunctional neighbors, but also to the West. Israel was smarter than both Europe and the US in it’s dealing with the financial crisis, and has continue to grow while most of the West is contracting and in financial difficulties. While popular discontent in the US gave birth to the angry and destructive “Tea Party”, and in the UK and other European states to mob violence, in Israel, in contrast, peaceful demonstration, complete with speeches by new, articulate, young leaders and musical performances, has led to government commitment to correcting market distortions. Israel has, furthermore, accomplished this feat while having to guard against a continuous threat of terrorism on all it borders, as well as against an unrelenting barrage of vicious and unjust propaganda directed at it (of the type “David” above demonstrates well.)
Isn’t it time that more well-intentioned Lefties, such as the publishers of this fine publication, the NY Times and others, grant Israel its due respect and accolades?

I think you miss the point about how Lebanon unlike Syria had drawn so many foreign powers into that little country (France, US, Israel, Iran via Hizbollah, Syria, Sauds,).

Ephraim says:

In the haftarah of the weekly Torah portion from a couple of weeks ago, Eikev, Isaiah says that at the time of the redemption, G-d will make the enemies of Israel “drunk on their own blood as with sweet wine”.

Maybe he was on to something.

In any case, the more the Arabs kill each other, the less danger they pose to Israel.

I wish the Arabs the best of luck in their civil war, and may all sides fight each other down to the last man and the last bullet.

andrew r says:

“I wish the Arabs the best of luck in their civil war, and may all sides fight each other down to the last man and the last bullet.”

As much as I don’t like the Israeli brand of racial segregation, bloodthirsty comments like this are a helpful reminder in why I don’t like anyone who supports Israel, either.

I just choose the information a great deal, I do hope you would likely blog a lot more about it.


Your comment may be no longer than 2,000 characters, approximately 400 words. HTML tags are not permitted, nor are more than two URLs per comment. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments.

Thank You!

Thank you for subscribing to the Tablet Magazine Daily Digest.
Please tell us about you.

Civil Blood

The central issue in the Middle East is not the Arab-Israeli peace process but the Arab civil war that has been reignited by the so-called Arab Spring

More on Tablet:

A Tale of Three Twitter Feeds: Hamas Tweets in Arabic, English, and Hebrew

By Aaron Magid — Analysis of the social-media messaging of Hamas’ military wing reveals distinct voices for the West, the Arab Middle East, and Israel