The leader of nonviolent protests in the West Bankâa potential Palestinian Gandhiâis in an Israeli jail
Last month, the yearlong prison sentence of Abdallah Abu Rahmah, a schoolteacher and activist involved in nonviolent civil disobedience in the West Bank, came to an end. But an Israeli military court refused to release him, on the grounds that he would resume his activities if freed.
Abu Rahmahâs crime was organizing illegal demonstrations in a West Bank village where all demonstrations are by definition illegal. Abu Rahmah, 39, had long been involved in peaceful, multiethnic protests in the village of Bilâin, where Israelâs separation wall has cut Palestinians off from hundreds of acres of their land. Though barely covered in the American press, his conviction was protested by Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and Catherine Ashton, the foreign policy chief of the European Union, among others. âIsraelâs attempt to crack down on this effective resistance movement by criminalizing peaceful protest is unacceptable and unjust,â said Desmond Tutu, one of Abu Rahmahâs supporters.
American Jews often ask where the Palestinian Gandhi is. What few realize is that if such a man exists, heâs probably sitting in an Israeli military prison.
Right now, thereâs a small but significant nonviolent resistance movement in the West Bank. The important recent documentary Budrus tells the story of its beginning in 2003. Thatâs when Budrus community activist Ayed Morrar, with the help of his astonishingly intrepid 15-year-old daughter Iltezam, succeeded, through peaceful but resolute protest, in thwarting plans to build the wall on their villageâs land. Their modelâcommunity-based, grassroots efforts to protect their propertyâspread through neighboring villages, including Bilâin.
Over five years in Bilâin, demonstratorsâa mix of Palestinians, Israelis, and foreignersâheld weekly demonstrations against the building of the wall, which annexed much of the villageâs land into a nearby Israeli settlement. Israelâs Supreme Court ruled the wallâs route illegal, saying, âWe were not convinced that it is necessary for security-military reasons to retain the current route that passes on Bilâinâs lands.â But construction continued. For most of the world, this village of 1,700 clearly has justice on its side. And though there has been some rock throwing, Abu Rahmah and other activists have done their best to prevent it and to maintain the moral high ground.
As Ethan Bronner wrote in the New York Times last year, the Bilâin movement âis one of the longest-running and best organized protest operations in the history of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and it has turned this once anonymous farming village into a symbol of Palestinian civil disobedience, a model that many supporters of the Palestinian cause would like to see spread and prosper.â
Much rides on the fate of the Bilâin model. With peace talks going nowhere, thereâs a lot of talk among Palestinians about a new uprising, a third intifada. There are Palestinian leaders who, for both tactical and moral reasons, are desperate to make it nonviolent. Everyone concerned about the future of the Middle East has good reason to hope that they succeed.
âI believe our future depends totally on the rise of the nonviolent movement,â the liberal Palestinian activist Mustafa Barghouti said over lunch recently. Nonviolent resistance, he said, is âwhy I live.â
Barghouti, who finished second to Mahmoud Abbas in the 2005 Palestinian National Authority elections, believes that continued settlements are making the death of the two-state solution imminent. As a last gasp, he wants Palestinians to unilaterally declare a state within 1967 borders and challenge the world to recognize it. âIf the world community does not accept our approach of recognizing a Palestinian state immediately in â67 borders, and forcing Israel to accept that, you will be witnessing the death of the two-state option,â he said. âAnd then we will have a very long struggle against apartheid. Nonviolent.â
This, as Barghouti knows, would be profoundly threatening to Israel. âFor them, I am more dangerous than those who do military action, because I expose their system,â he said. Israelâs actions suggest that at least some in the military agree, because the Palestinian nonviolent movement is being systematically crushed.
In 2005, as Human Rights Watch reports, Abdallah Abu Rahmahâs brother Rateb Abu Rahmah was shot in the foot and arrested for stone throwing and assaulting a border policeman. During the trial, video evidence proved that the policeman had given false testimony. Eventually, the policeman confessed to fabricating his story, and Rateb was acquitted.
Mohammed Khatib, another leader of the Bilâin protests, was arrested in 2008 and charged with stone throwing. He later proved that he was on the Pacific island of New Caledonia at the time of the alleged incident. Nevertheless, he was held for nine months and only released on the condition that he report to the police station weekly during the time of the protests. Since May 2008, according to Popular Struggle Coordination Committee, an umbrella group for the nonviolent village-based movements, there have been 119 arrests in Bilâin. The Israeli army has started using live ammunition against the demonstrators, and four unarmed anti-wall protesters have been killed.
Last December, Abu Rahmah, the coordinator of the Bilâin Popular Committee Against the Wall and Settlements, was arrested in a 2 a.m. raid on his home. In a particularly absurd twist, he was charged with weapons possession, because heâd once collected used tear gas projectiles and bullet casings to demonstrate the types of ammunition that the IDF was using. Eventually, he was acquitted of that charge, but he was convicted of organizing illegal demonstrations and of incitement, which, under Israeli military law, means an âattempt, verbally or otherwise, to influence public opinion in the Area in a way that may disturb the public peace or public order.â
Abu Rahmahâs wife Majida has been denied permits to visit him in the Israeli military prison where heâs been held. He hasnât seen his 1-and-a-half-year-old son since the baby was 6 months old. Heâs not even allowed to make a phone call.
âWe are concerned that his continued detention on charges of incitement and organizing and attending demonstrations is intended to prevent him and other Palestinians from exercising their legitimate right to nonviolent protest against the annexation of Palestinian land to Israel,â said a statement by the British Foreign Office. Itâs hard to come to any other conclusion.
Of course, the challenge to nonviolence isnât only coming from Israel. Thereâs hardly a consensus about the need for nonviolence among the Palestinian population: A 2008 poll by the Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research found that an overwhelming 84 percent of Palestinians supported a deadly attack on a West Jerusalem religious school that took place that year. But itâs at least conceivable that such support for violence could diminish if Palestinians believed there were other routes to freedom. One of the jobs of any social movement, after all, is to build ideological support for positions that might at first seem naĂŻve or absurd.
âThis is the Palestinian alternative to despair,â Jonathan Pollack, one of the leading Israeli activists working with the Palestinian protesters, said of nonviolent civil disobedience. âBoth to the despair of futile negotiation, and to the despair of armed struggle. If Israel manages to kill this movement, to put this movement down, the consequences are going to be grave, both for Palestinians and for Israelis.â
Israelâs leaders have abandoned the details of governance, as last weekâs catastrophic wildfire tragically showed
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocalâand, often, anonymousâminorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal feeâless a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at firstname.lastname@example.org. Each week, weâll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.