Your email is not valid
Recipient's email is not valid
Submit Close

Your email has been sent.

Click here to send another

Conference Call

The Lithuanian sponsors of a Holocaust education program have a dark history of their own

Print Email
Panelists at the opening session of the Vilnius conference. (Sebastian Pammer)
Related Content

The Crime of Surviving

By arguing that Nazi and Soviet crimes are equal, Lithuania is airbrushing the Holocaust out of its history

Today is the fifth and last day of an event in the Lithuanian capital that few would have thought likely: an international conference on Holocaust education whose prime local partners are two state-sponsored bodies that specialize in downgrading the Holocaust into “one of two equal genocides”—a phenomenon I wrote about for Tablet magazine last May. The Genocide Research Center runs a Genocide Museum that doesn’t mention the word Holocaust and that features 1950s anti-Semitic exhibits without curatorial comment. The second, a state-financed commission on Nazi and Soviet crimes, published some good research but lost credibility when Yitzchak Arad, the Holocaust survivor-scholar it had recruited precisely for credibility purposes, was himself accused of “war crimes” in 2006—for having escaped the ghetto to join the anti-Nazi resistance. The commission didn’t have a public word to say about that, or about the subsequent “war crimes investigations,” widely regarded as kangaroo, started in 2008 (and still not closed) against two Jewish heroines of the anti-Nazi resistance. And so, this week’s conference might be considered a horrible joke at best; at worst, it is a grim circus of historical manipulation.

The event, called “Training teacher-trainers: European Holocaust History, Human Rights, and Tolerance Today,” featured just one session open to the public, held on Monday morning. The speakers at the opening session were U.S. Ambassador Anne E. Derse; State Jewish Museum (Tolerance Center) head Markas Zingeris; diplomat-historian Alfonsas Eidintas; and two senior Jewish-American dignitaries, AJC director of international relations Andrew Baker, and Washington Holocaust Museum outreach director Stephen Feinberg. The controversial right-wing Jewish MP Emanuelis Zingeris, himself a signatory of the Prague Declaration, made a characteristically dramatic entry halfway through and spoke briefly. Finally, a vice-director of the museum invited the assembled to coffee and politely reminded everyone that the following sessions were closed to all but invited participants.

None of the speakers made any acknowledgment to the silently seated leaders of the Jewish community, who were not asked by the organizers to say a word of greeting. And not one of the speeches managed to mention the essential facts of the sobering history: The Baltics had the highest percentage of Jewish deaths in Holocaust-era Europe—around 95 percent—because of the massive local collaboration, which in this part of the world entailed serving in many cases as the actual murderers. Nor did they mention that during 2010, a Lithuanian court legalized public swastikas. That the permit for a neo-Nazi parade was taken out by a member of parliament. That the foreign minister claimed a foreign Jewish plot is behind new dual-citizenship proposals. That zero progress is made on enabling the safe return of 89-year-old Holocaust survivor Rachel Margolis, one of the Jewish partisan veterans under special prosecutors’ sham investigation. It was as if a grand new field of “Lithuanian Holocaust Studies” could gain international acceptance while shirking each and every one of the painful issues with impunity.

Conspicuously absent at the conference were the foreign ambassadors in town, from Britain, Estonia, Finland, France, Netherlands, Norway, and Sweden. NATO envoys for these seven countries here last week sent a formal letter (organized by the British embassy, rumor has it) to Lithuanian authorities protesting the recent Holocaust denial in the press by an Interior Ministry specialist (who has since resigned). The letter also made bold reference to the broader issue: “Spurious attempts are made to equate the uniquely evil genocide of the Jews with Soviet crimes against Lithuania, which, though great in magnitude, cannot be regarded as equivalent in either their intention or result.” The Polish ambassador added his own eloquent letter.

And from the United States? Utter, painful silence.


In the diplomatic community here, the codeword for this saga is “The $64,000 Question” (even though the operative currency is the euro). Back in April, Hannah Rosenthal, the United States Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism, announced during a trip to Lithuania that “the U.S. Embassy in Vilnius has received a 63,572 Euro grant for International Holocaust Education, Remembrance, and Research to develop a Holocaust education program with the Lithuanian Ministry of Education and other partners.” As the sum is identical to one applied for by the U.S. embassy from the International Task Force for International Cooperation on Holocaust Education, Remembrance and Research, it is assumed that the ITF is the source of the funding.

An October query from to the American embassy elicited an Orwellian response from a senior embassy official: “Disbursement information about USG public diplomacy grants is not public” [italics mine]. Then, on November 21, the Tel Aviv-based Association of Lithuanian Jews, the world’s most active association of Holocaust survivors from Lithuania, released to the media its letter to the U.S. ambassador, which included the warning that “it would be a huge and painful blow to Holocaust Survivors, and to the memory of the victims, if even one single euro were granted to those engaged in pursuing and promoting this antisemitic revisionism under the guise of local Holocaust education.” The letter went on to ask the embassy to release “all details of disbursement of this grant without further delay to clear the air.”

On the day of the conference opening, Efraim Zuroff, director of the Simon Wiesenthal Center’s Israel office, which focuses on bringing war criminals to justice, preventing their posthumous rehabilitation, and on defending the historical narrative of the Holocaust, wrote in the Guardian: “For Washington to ignore a blatant distortion of the historical events of the Second World War only emboldens those invested in outright denial of the Holocaust.” While the U.S. Embassy in Vilnius, the United State Holocaust Memorial Museum, or the American Jewish Committee could have been expected to stand firm against the historical record being revised by the right-wing leadership of the Baltic states, and with the Holocaust Survivor community to which it has been loyal in the past, it is hard to ignore the frightening possibility that they have all, on this particular occasion, been duped. By whom? A highly polished state-sponsored effort to win Western and foreign Jewish acquiescence to the obfuscation of the Holocaust and the legitimization of that obfuscation, in history and education alike. All that’s needed is for a handful of foreign dignitaries and the American Embassy to be bamboozled once, and that alleged conceptual support will be cited until the end of days.


It is not too late to turn this frightful fiasco into an inspirational success. On the last day of the conference, and with future events planned under the same grant, some bold welcome correctives can be enacted. Here are six for starters:

1. Invite a group of Holocaust Survivors―including Rachel Margolis―to sit in the front row, and invite them to meet at length with the educators being trained.

2. Tackle today’s hard issues up front—including the Prague Declaration, the ongoing Lithuanian investigations against Holocaust Survivor resistance heroes, and the recent law in effect criminalizing the Western narrative of the Holocaust by threatening two years in prison for those who would deny the notion of two equal genocides—instead of sweeping them under the rug.

3. Exclude the state organizations that campaign for the “Genocide and Resistance Research Center of  Lithuania” and the “International Commission for the Evaluation of the Crimes of the Nazi and Soviet Occupation Regimes in Lithuania” (the so called red-brown commission, from which Yitzhak Arad and Sir Martin Gilbert resigned on principle, leaving it with no credibility in serious Holocaust studies circles).

4. Give the Jewish community of today’s Lithuania a primary role in Holocaust education. Have these educators meet real living Jews of various generations. Enable, most urgently, the fine young educators attending the conference to get to know prewar Lithuanian Jews at the last moment in history when this is possible, thereby fostering the inter-community harmony and understanding that comes from genuine dialogue.

5. Use grant funds to bring to Lithuania ample copies of essential books in English on the Lithuanian Holocaust. Virtually all the history teachers in question read English, and there is no reason why they should not have access to the same materials that their counterparts in the West use to study this subject. Among these for Lithuania would be Yitzhak Arad’s The Holocaust in the Soviet Union, Karen Sutton’s The Massacre of the Jews of Lithuania, Efraim Zuroff’s Operation Last Chance, and published primary sources such as Kazimierz Sakowicz’s Ponary Diary.

6. Make certain the sessions are never again closed to the public.

Dovid Katz is chief analyst at the Litvak Studies Institute and a research associate at University College London. He is the author of Lithuanian Jewish Culture and the website

Print Email

Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180

Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.

Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.

We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.

Plus ça change, plus ce la même chose. / The more things change the more they remain the same.

Lithuania is now a member of the EU which means it is subject to decisions by the European Human Rights court and other EU bodies. Tackling it means forcing them to take people to court and then challenging them through the EU institutions. Its a complicated process and will require a dedicated organization like Bani Brith to take it on (leading to the inevitable cries of world Jewish conspiracies).

I think this stuff should be challenged, also the Lithuanians have an embassy in the USA and in New York and won’t like it if people demonstrate there.

Brilliantly expressed….thank you for sharing your struggles…happy Khanuke…m’l’

The only way to stop this is through external pressure by Western countries. The red-brown equivalency narrative almost completely dominates inside Lithuania. Diplomats need to take a hard line and say no, you tried to join the Axis and you lost, you DID murder the Jewish population, you were NOT subjected to genocide in the Soviet Union and you were occupied as Germany was occupied after the war. Going easy, trying to gently pull (younger) Lithuanians toward the truth HAS NOT WORKED. It’s time for confrontation, not feel-good stories and coddling, and certainly not for the US embassy to be involved in paying for pro-Nazi propaganda.

Western countries have their own problem. During Cold War they gave shelter and protection to hundreds if not thousands of mass murderers from Baltic states and Ukraine. Sweden, USA, Canada, UK and Australia – all were involved in this kind of “philanthropy”. If they could use half of their pity toward Jewish refugees (instead of Nazi criminals) during WWII – how many innocent lives they could save then?

Caroline says:

“It is not too late to turn this frightful fiasco into an inspirational success” as Dr Katz writes. I so hope, for Lithuanias sake, that this country´s officials listen to this wise mans advice and do not shoot the messenger. Take his six starting correctives seriously and apply them. And it´s a shame that these correctives have to be considered being bold, beacuse in fact they aren´t bold at all. It´s just common sense.

David Star says:

The lie of Lithanian innocence during the Shoah is a flame which cannot be extinguished in a 1,000 years. The Jewish community which had lived under the thumb of majority catholic population lived in constant fear of pogroms brought on by the devout, usually times of Christian Holy (read inflamed sermons and alcohol) celebrations when a rash of rape, murder and pillaging took place. The police were always too busy elsewhere to intercede.
With the advent of the Nazi German takeover of Lithuania these Christian anit-Semites rushed to aid their new masters,both as civilians and uniformed units to kill most ot the remaining Jews who did escape to Russia.
The governments of Lithuania have been a series hypocritical liars who visit Yad Vashem Holocaust Memorial weeping cocodile tears for their “Lost Jewsih Brethren”, While lying through their teeth about their efforts to prosecute the Nazis among them.

Ruth Gutmann says:

It may be true that for a while in the 1930s (!) some Lithuanian Jews supported the Soviets rulers, in hopes of escaping the destructive actions of the anti-semites instigated by the Church and the Nazi-supported right wing. Ever since then the Lithuanians have taken their revenge. And now this has been blown up into what you describe. American Jews, many of whom have roots in Lithuania, have done little or nothing to oppose these dreadful developments.

But why only Lithuanians? United Kingdom in 1939 issued the so called “white paper” – the set of laws which limited Jewish immigration into Palestine and thus denied refuge to many thousands of Jewish refugees who later were murdered in Auschwitz and Treblinka. Did anybody accuse Great Britain of complicity in genocide against Jewish population? Did Great Britain ever apologize for its role (intentional or not) in the destruction of European Jewry, when British ships, instead of fighting German navy, were guarding shores of Palestine from the defenseless Jewish refugees? It is easy to attack small potato like Lithuania. What about Sweden or Canada, the countries which gave shelter to Nazi criminals who are now being glorified in Baltic states and Ukraine? Why nobody criticizes them?

Jayson Rex says:

Lithuanians? Well, the SS loved Lithuanians. They were the best and most reliable recruits for Einsatzkommando – the SS Liquidation Groups. Today, they are trying to make us forget their past but it will not be possible: maybe in 2 or 3 millenia. Maybe never.

Julia Wolf Mazow says:

thank you so much for writing as you did & helping me & others understand such important issues.

This is exactly what I have been in search of all day. Do not stop updating this web site.

Just want to say your article is as surprising. The clearness in your post is just great and i can assume you’re an expert on this subject. Well with your permission allow me to grab your RSS feed to keep up to date with forthcoming post. Thanks a million and please keep up the enjoyable work.

Thanks for another informative web site. Where else could I get that kind of info written in such an ideal way? I have a project that I am just now working on, and I have been on the look out for such info.

Howdy very nice website!! Man .. Beautiful .. Amazing .. I will bookmark your site and take the feeds additionallyˇKI’m happy to find a lot of helpful information here within the publish, we need work out more techniques in this regard, thanks for sharing. . . . . .

I’ve said that least 2054886 times. The problem this like that is they are just too compilcated for the average bird, if you know what I mean

I’ve said that least 2209677 times. The problem this like that is they are just too compilcated for the average bird, if you know what I mean

Hi there, May I grab your image and implement it on my web log?

Thanks for this particular advice I was basically browsing all Google to be able to find it!

I am using Maximuscle Cyclone now for approximately three years and absolutely find it to be definitely effective at letting me gain muscle size and measurable strength quicker than using some other brand of supplement. Alternative to using Maximuscle Cylcone, I sometimes made use of tons of market leading all-in-one formulas and muscle gain supplements to no real avail. Whilst making use of Maximuscle Cyclone for periods of time I noticeabley gain about a lb of muscle mass a week, when seeing consistent gains in my lifting weights, which clearly alter my physique to others and my training buddies. Only thing is, I hope I can still find discount MaxiMuscle Cyclone online, as I have been told that you can only buy the stuff now in Boots at like full price! yikes!

Good post. I be taught something tougher on completely different blogs everyday. It should always be stimulating to read content material from different writers and observe slightly something from their store. I’d prefer to make use of some with the content on my weblog whether or not you don’t mind. Natually I’ll give you a hyperlink in your internet blog. Thanks for sharing.

I’m really impressed along with your writing abilities and also with the format to your blog. Is that this a paid topic or did you customize it yourself? Either way keep up the nice quality writing, it is uncommon to see a great blog like this one nowadays..

From my observation, shopping for electronic products online may be easily expensive, nevertheless there are some tips that you can use to help you get the best discounts. There are generally ways to locate discount bargains that could make one to come across the best consumer electronics products at the lowest prices. Interesting blog post.

I like your blog site.. excellent shades & design. Does you style this site your self or perhaps do you bring in help to get it done for you? Plz interact since I!


Your comment may be no longer than 2,000 characters, approximately 400 words. HTML tags are not permitted, nor are more than two URLs per comment. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments.

Thank You!

Thank you for subscribing to the Tablet Magazine Daily Digest.
Please tell us about you.

Conference Call

The Lithuanian sponsors of a Holocaust education program have a dark history of their own

More on Tablet:

11 Non-Jewish Celebrities—and 2 Jewish Ones—Show Off Their Hebrew Tattoos

By Marjorie Ingall — You don’t have to be Jewish to sport Hebrew ink. But some of these stars should have thought twice before going under the needle.