Your email is not valid
Recipient's email is not valid
Submit Close

Your email has been sent.

Click here to send another

Q&A: Tzipi Livni: The Kadima leader on Peace, American Jews, and Iran

The Kadima leader says Israel is not the safest place in the world for Jews

Print Email
Tzipi Livni in Tel Aviv, 2009. (David Silverman/Getty Images)

When Tzipi Livni is uncomfortable with a question, she shifts in her chair. When she is called upon to lie or evade, she blushes. If something strikes her as funny, she laughs. She is not naturally inclined toward paradox or irony. Her patent lack of interest in deception makes politics seem like an odd career choice.

In a country and a region led by men with outsize egos and florid personality disorders, the leader of Israel’s opposition Kadima party is an anomaly because she seems so resolutely normal—the hard-working child of ideologues who devoted their lives to building the state. Along with President Shimon Peres, she is the acceptable face of Israeli democracy in world capitals that feel little affection for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

A protégée of former Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, Livni served as foreign minister under Sharon’s successor, Ehud Olmert. She was the official lead Israeli negotiator during the 2007 Annapolis peace conference (while the real negotiating was done in secret by Olmert) and explained Israel’s wars to the world.

She began her career in an elite Mossad unit in Paris between 1980 and 1984, after being recruited into the agency at the age of 22 by a childhood friend named Mira Gal, who later became her chief of staff. “The risks were tangible,” Gal has said of those years, when the Jewish community in Paris was targeted by Palestinian bombs and machine-gun attacks and Israeli agents were said to have assassinated a key figure in the Iraqi nuclear program, an Egyptian physicist named Yehia el-Mashad, who was found in his hotel room with his throat slashed open and multiple stab wounds.

While it is assumed that Livni’s role as a young Mossad officer involved her formidable analytical skills and fluency in French, it is also worth noting that her father, Eitan Livni, served as chief operations officer for the Irgun during the Jewish underground’s bloody revolt against British rule in mandate Palestine.

I spoke to Livni in a modest room in an Upper East Side hotel. She was accompanied by a handler and a lone security man.

After Sept. 11, many in the American Jewish community had a renewed sense of a shared fate with Israel, especially in New York City. We were looking around nervously on buses and subways and being checked for weapons and bombs. Do you think that feeling of mutual understanding has dissolved?

Sept. 11 was a shock to the whole world. But I don’t think we should define ourselves through shared threats, because in doing so, we allow our enemies to define us. We need to define ourselves through a common vision that helps Israel put some meaning into the words “Jewish State.”

Many American Jews were shocked when the Rotem bill got wide publicity here. They felt that the State of Israel asks them to support the state and consider themselves partners in a shared vision, and here the State of Israel is saying that we, our children, our marriages, our rabbis, our customs, are not really Jewish.

I think that it’s a combination of a problematic system of election with very weak politicians. The problem is that a party like Likud, which is not ultra-Orthodox, gives the monopoly on the substance of the words “Jewish State” to the ultra-Orthodox. And this is something that affects not only our relationship with world Jewry but also my life in Israel. Together we need to change this bill. Kadima voted against it, and we hope the coalition will change it as well.

I was recently at a very nice dinner at the Plaza Hotel with former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, Sandy Berger, the former national security adviser, and assorted luminaries of the American Jewish community, hosted by Danny Abraham to honor President Mahmoud Abbas. Do you think these kinds of events are helpful in promoting peace, or do they simply give the Palestinian leadership a propaganda card they can play here?

In order to understand the others, we need to sit and speak with them. Since the elections, I decided personally not to have these kinds of meetings with Palestinians, because according to the rules of Israeli democracy I need to give space to the prime minister to make the right decisions. But I think this is an opportunity not just for Mahmoud Abbas to make propaganda but also to be asked difficult questions.

Supporting Israel was a free ticket for American Jews when George W. Bush was president. The Jews could count on the fact that Bush would support Israel even while they voted for the Democrats. Now with Barack Obama in office, some American Jews seem to feel torn between their traditional attachments to the Democratic Party and to Israel.

I know at first that when Obama was elected and he said that he supports a two-state solution, there were some people in Israel who said that he was anti-Israeli. But this was basically the same vision as President Bush. I don’t think that everything is a zero-sum game, in which when the president of the United States says something, that means that he is pro-Palestinian and anti-Israeli, or vice versa. I think that part of the responsibility of leadership here and in Israel is to find the common interests and issues on which we can work together. I believe that the need to prevent Iran from having a nuclear weapon is a shared interest, and to achieve peace between Israel and the Palestinians is a shared interest.

You had a close relationship with former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. What did you learn from her about how American administrations, regardless of party, perceive the conflicts between Israel and the Palestinians, and Israel and its neighbors?

For me it is clear that when it comes to the need of Israel to defend itself, the role of the United States of America is crucial. It was clear in our relations that we don’t have a hidden agenda. We played with open cards, I with her, and she with me, hopefully. There was the same kind of relationship between the prime minister and the president. This openness is something very important.

In World War II, the American Jewish community sent 550,000 troops to fight Hitler, and Jewish scientists were central figures in the invention and manufacture of the atomic bomb. They were the foot-soldiers of American democracy. Now they go to Harvard and start Facebook.

They contribute in another way.

But we have no connection to military life. When we see pictures from the war in Lebanon or Operation Cast Lead, we say, “This is wrong. Why should we support this? It’s terrible. This is not what Judaism in my synagogue was about. This is an army that’s killing people.”


I made a speech at Harvard, and someone asked me the same question. [Here, Livni’s handler states that the person who asked the question was also a Jew. Livni nods.] He said, “How can you speak about Jewish values when the Israeli army killed a thousand people in Gaza?” I said to him the following: “I don’t ask the world to turn a blind eye when Israel is attacking Gaza or Lebanon, and I’m willing to be judged by the entire world, as long as the world is judging us according to its own values. In each democracy, in the legal system, which is the expression of the values of the society, there is a distinction made between a murderer and someone who kills somebody by mistake. When a terrorist is looking for a child to kill, on the lines at a discotheque, at a pizza parlor, on buses, in schools, in kindergartens, that person is a murderer who is looking for children to kill. When an Israeli soldier in Gaza is trying to kill terrorists sometimes, by mistake, civilians are also killed. I expect the entire international community, and especially the leaders of the United States, Great Britain, and other members of the free world, who send their soldiers to fight all over the world, where sometimes civilians are killed, will understand and support us in making that distinction.”

I expect the Jews to understand because they know that in Israel, these soldiers are our children. An Israeli soldier is raised on values of respecting human life, and they don’t change their values when they turn 18 and enter the army. Even though they feel uneasy when these pictures are coming, they need to understand that these things happen when you defend your own citizens.

But that’s not how American Jews live their lives. They go on Facebook, they go to the shopping mall, they go to Harvard—but by and large, they don’t go into the army. Their reality is the reality of most people in the West, who live in a world that is largely detached from the killing that our soldiers do every day in far-away places like Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iraq.

While you were talking I had the following thought, which I think is important, and perhaps not unrelated to what you just said. In the past, Israel said to world Jewry that Israel is the safe place to be when things deteriorate in the places where you live. Israel is the safe shelter, we are going to keep this shelter for you, we are going to fight for the existence of this shelter. In return, you need to defend Israel whenever it is necessary, whether it is with AIPAC, or whatever. This was the nature of the dialogue between Israel and the Jews in the Diaspora.

Today’s Israel is not a safer place for Jews to live than other places in the world. Sometimes Israel is more dangerous. I don’t expect world Jewry just to defend Israel unconditionally. It is fine for them to criticize the policy of any Israeli government, as long as they understand that there is a difference between criticism of the policy of any government and the basics. Because there is a process of delegitimization of the State of Israel, and some of the criticism is being used by those who do not accept the right of Israel to exist. Simultaneously, we need to work together in order to decide what the meaning of the Jewish State is in terms of our shared values, and to speak about it.

I’m going to ask you a nice question that relates to the major themes that brought you here after I ask you one more bad question.

[Laughs] OK.

How many more years do you think that the State of Israel can maintain a wide-ranging settlement policy in the West Bank and still speak to the American Jewish public and the leaders of democratic nations as a normal, functioning democratic state?

I believe that the values of the State of Israel as a Jewish and democratic state require us to make one big decision, which is not easy for any Israeli leader, and this is to divide the land of Israel and to implement the vision of two states for two peoples. We need to choose between two different visions, one of which used to be the vision of the State of Israel, and is now the vision of a minority, which is that we need to have Jews living on the entire land—

That’s the vision that you grew up with. It was your father’s vision.

Yes. But I grew up with other values, including respect for others. That was also part of the vision of my parents and of Jabotinsky. Usually people are familiar with Jabotinsky for saying that both sides of the Jordan River will be ours. But that is not simply what Jabotinsky wrote.

Jabotinsky was the most human and realistic of the early Zionist leaders because he understood that the Palestinians were also a people with a history and human pride and that they would not simply accept the idea that the Jews would transform Palestine into a Jewish state.

So, you see, I grew up with this understanding and these values also. We need to divide the land so that we can have Israel as the homeland of the Jewish people and a democratic state.

Former Prime Minister Olmert recently spoke in public about what he says are the terms he offered to Mahmoud Abbas, including the division of the land more or less on the 1967 borders and giving up Israeli sovereignty over the Old City of Jerusalem. He says that Abbas did not respond to his offer. If Netanyahu were to make the same offer and again there was no response, do you think that Israel simply needs to leave that land unilaterally the way Sharon left Gaza?

I supported the disengagement plan, but I prefer to have a peace treaty with the Palestinians. Any withdrawal from more land needs to be part of an agreement that this is the end of the conflict.

But what if that’s not possible?

I know it’s possible. I negotiated for nine months. Olmert’s offer to Mahmoud Abbas was not part of these negotiations. I believe that by building the negotiations in the right way we can end the conflict. At least, I believe we haven’t tried it the right way yet, so we don’t know what the result will be.

If you had to imagine a project that would help to build a sense of community and shared destiny between the American Jewish community and the government and the people of Israel, what would that be?

I think we should have a kind of roundtable in which we decide on our priorities. But from listening to the situation here and knowing the situation in Israel, I think it’s education. In Israel we have a young generation that—whether they are ultra-Orthodox and not willing to accept other streams in Judaism, or whether they are secular and for them being a Jew is being a Hebrew-speaking Israeli person and going to the army—they don’t relate to the understanding that they are part of something larger and have brothers and sisters all over the world. In the Jewish communities here, my understanding is that, as you said, some young people feel embarrassed by Israel, they don’t defend Israel, for them Israel is somewhere in the Middle East, and they don’t feel that they need to be that concerned when things deteriorate in Israel. I think we need to invest in education on both sides.

I am being told that I have exhausted my 30 minutes. Can I have another five minutes?

OK. Three minutes.

How successful has the campaign to isolate and delegitimize the Iranian government been over the past year?

I think that the economic sanctions were not effective enough. And since you were talking in terms of delegitimization, I think that it didn’t work, because you could see Ahmadinejad only a few weeks ago taking the stage at the United Nations—

I was there. The room was two-thirds empty. Except for the press gallery, which was full.

The world gives Ahmadinejad and other Iranian officials stages to express their agenda of hatred. I think that part of the sanctions should be diplomatic sanctions that deny these people stages to express these ideas. This is another kind of sanction that would not hurt the Iranian people but target these officials. The people in Iran can feel that these leaders are being delegitimized and not being given stages to say whatever they want to say, including Ahmadinejad’s horrific words about Sept. 11, denying the Holocaust, and stating clearly that his vision is to wipe the State of Israel off the map.

Is it your sense that the Stuxnet worm—

Oh, no. Your last question was enough.

If the Iranians can’t be sure that they control their own nuclear facilities, it makes it less possible for them to believe in the efficacy of their program, or in a future bomb. You have nothing to say on this subject?


Print Email

Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180

Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.

Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.

We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.

Dani Levi says:

Hot hot hot.

Too bad you didn’t ask her about the last Lebanese war and how she signed an agreement that has resulted in Hizbullah pouring massive amounts of arms into Southern Lebanon. Or how about asking her how was it to serve under the most corrupt prime minister in Israel’s history?

Great interview. And another sad example of a smart and talented Israeli leader who in fact can’t lead. Like Ehud Barak and Avraham Burg, I assume she’ll eventually cash out and write a book.

A good question would have been why she did not join the government when asked by Netanyahu.This would have biven Bibi a lot more flexibility in dealinf with the Palestinians and would have freed him from having to abide by the wishes of the extreme right wingers and the ultr-orthodox.

Caroline Bock says:

I would be interested in how many American Jews are in the military — I think you will find more than you imagine.. a few years ago I was at a wedding of a Jewish JAG corp officer — there were more than a handful of Jewish military men present. Do not underestimate American Jews willingness to serve. However, I too question the extreme right wing interpretation of who is Jewish and what sex can stand and pray where… Israel is turning away American Jews (of all stripes) just when she needs us the most.

I can’t vouch for Ehud Olmert fitting Carl’s assertion as “the most corrupt prime minister in Israel’s history,” but having witnessed George W. Bush and his largess to Halliburton worth billions in contracts not put up for bid because he and Cheney vouched for their ex-employer’s credibility? Remember that the dynamic duo followed up by doing the same favor for their ex-employer in Louisiana and the Gulf Coast following Katrina? Remember the charges of over-billing and unfinished and shoddy construction their best choice produced? Or how about Irangate for the Reagan Administration, or Teapot Dome?

Not to justify political corruption in Israel but, if Olmert is convicted in the end, how come Bush-Cheney never came under investigation, never faced the impeachment suggested by their crimes.

Let’s not throw stones at Israel’s legal-political system before taking stock of our own.

C. Bock says:

I would be interested in how many American Jews are in the military — I think you will find more than you imagine.. a few years ago I was at a wedding of a Jewish JAG corp officer — there were more than a handful of Jewish military men present. Do not underestimate American Jews willingness to serve. However, I too question the extreme right wing interpretation of who is Jewish and what sex can stand and pray where..

Rivka says:

Ms. Livni is one very smart lady. Her answers were clearly thought out and she lived through them. A very interesting dialogue.
Thank you!

“Along with President Shimon Peres, she is the acceptable face of Israeli democracy in world capitals that feel little affection for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.”
That is like saying, about Sarah Palin that “she is the acceptable face of American democracy …for President Obama.”

It is really a non-objective, political statement and it has no place being disguised as objective repoortage.

Plenty of American Jews serve in the military. I certainly did, and I knew of many others. Of course, most of them were southern Jews – the demographic tilt in military service is pretty strong. Perhaps you aren’t traveling in the right circles if you don’t think Jews serve proudly in the military. I’m the third (at least) generation in my family to serve, and I suspect my nephew will go to West Point, and my daughter has talked about joining the National Guard. Thanks for reinforcing a stereotype.

Hunter says:

I was the one who asked her the ‘provocative’ question while at Harvard. The quote you have is not accurate. What I said was “Yesterday (referring to 10/4/10) I read that you condemned a settler attack on a West Bank mosque as going against the ethical intelligence and values of Judaism. In 2006 when your administration murdered over 1,000 Lebanese and over 1,000 Gazans in 2009, where was that sense of ethical action?”

Her answer provided in your article seems accurate based on my memory. Funny how these “off the record” talks inevitably go on the record.

billie says:

I just wish she would have joined the Netanyahu government. While there are no guarantees, I suspect things would be better. And Hunter of the “provocative question,” while all civilian deaths are tragic, Livni is absolutely right that there is a world of difference in purposely murdering civilians, e.g., Holocaust survivors at a Passover Seder and accidentally killing them during a military action. I find your thesis self righteous. Do you think it’s ok for Israel not to respond to constant barrages of missiles? I don’t know where you live, but let’s assume it’s eastern California and missiles are coming at you on a daily basis from Nevada. Should the governor of California do nothing? I recommend you thoroughly read the Hamas charter; if it weren’t so dangerous, one might consider it the theater of the absurd.

will edwards says:

Military service was generally the path those without the benefit of a good college education and financial backing took. A lot of the Jewish in the circles where Harvard was a valid option would not stymie their growth in society by entering the military. What is amazing to me is that there are a whole lot more Jews who aren’t in such circles then are. They, apparently, aren’t subject of this supposition. I used military service to pay for college.

will edwards says:

Until the Palestinians (actually a name they attached to themselves during enactment of the Balfour debacle) come to accept Judaism and the Jewish people as valid entities there will be no peace. Any surrender of land would be foolish and a sign of both ignorance and weakness. Those areas now considered under Palestinian control need to be washed out and returned to Israel. Once Israel is whole again we can begin to negotiate with these who call themselves Palestinians… ya know in Palestine there were more Jews then Arabs…both were considered Palestinians.

Rachel says:

I enjoyed reading this, thank you!

I have always been a fan of Tzipi Livni. Her life speaks for itself when she talks about Israel. However, it is not the Jewish American community that she needs to win over, it is the Israeli voting public. (While outreach to explain themselves worldwide does need to be more of a priority to Israel)We don’t get a vote and if you really think that the Israeli who sits in the glare of an Iranian nuclear weapon, Hamas and Hezbollah rockets cares what those ensconced safely in Westchester, LA or the upper west side of Manhattan think about how they should protect themselves, then you need some help with your narcissistic personality disorder.

Full of nonsense that went unexplored. For example, Livni’s statement:

“I expect the Jews to understand because they know that in Israel, these soldiers are our children. An Israeli soldier is raised on values of respecting human life, and they don’t change their values when they turn 18 and enter the army.”

And the author’s bizarre question:

“Jabotinsky was the most human and realistic of the early Zionist leaders because he understood that the Palestinians were also a people with a history and human pride and that they would not simply accept the idea that the Jews would transform Palestine into a Jewish state.”

“most human” my ass.

jacobo says:

“These soldiers are our children”

Reminds me of the Lone Ranger joke where the fictional cowboy and his sidekick, Tonto, find themselves surrounded by Indians –

Lone Ranger – “Looks like we’re trapped, Tonto.”

Tonto – “What do you mean we, white man?”

translation: Don’t count on us Jewish-Americans, Israel, because you don’t represent us.

Ittai says:

Pleasant puff piece. Is she running for Congress in November?

“… This is an army that’s killing people.”

Will somebody please explain to this towering intellect that that’s what armies often do?

Jews are the extreme people. There are Jew like Einstein and there are Jews like Hunter. He probably feels very proud of himself by asking Livni silly questions. I wonder what question he would ask if instead of Harvard this lecture would happen to be in Sderot in 2009 or in Kiriat Shmona in 2006? I have no doubt he thinks that dark skinned mizrahim live in Sderot because they are stupid people since if they would be smart like him they would be asking Livni the same questions in Harvard.

Few remarks about posters.
Hunter (I already mentioned him): “I … asked her the ‘provocative’ question while at Harvard. In 2006 when your administration murdered over 1,000 Lebanese and over 1,000 Gazans in 2009, where was that sense of ethical action?”
This question, Hunter, you should ask not in Harvard but in Sderot to people who live there. Maybe they could help you to understand Livni’s answer better.
David: ““most human” my ass.”
You found the great way to present your arguments. Very Jewish. Congratulations.
Jacobo: “Don’t count on us Jewish-Americans”
May I suggest you to avoid generalizations in the future? Could you speak just for yourself, please?

David Fried says:

I wish Ms. Livni had discussed the rapidly-growing gulf between Israel and American Jews on the question of Jewish identity. My new answer to the question “What do you think of Israel’s right to exist?”–“The Jewish people are as entitled as any other to have a state of their own, and I hope we get one some day.” By which I mean, I will support Israel as the Jewish state as soon as it is prepared to recognize that I am a Jew by birth (and I am, but how could I possibly prove it to a beit din? I had the misfortune to grow up in a free country without an anti-Semitic government to helpfully label me “Yevrei”; my adopted children are Jews without the catch-22 of halachic conversion by one of the two rabbis in the world currently approved by whatever Israel rabbinical authority does the approving (And will someone please tell me who they are, before they are excommunicated and their conversions are annulled?); my converted relatives are Jews: and the religion we practice, with women reading the Haftarah while they wear talesim, is Judaism, rather than a criminal offense. Israel is the only nation on earth where Jews are thrown in jail for praying in public. It doesn’t happen in Venezuela or Iran. When Israel straightens this out, and decides to become the state of the Jewish people wherever they live and however they practice, or don’t practice, their religion, I will go back to being a Zionist. Until then, what is Israel to me but a corrupt khniak theocracy?

What Livni doesn’t understand about Israel’s situation:

Tom Mitchell says:

@Caroline Bock,
I served in the Army Reserve until 2009. My impression was that Jews were approximately the same percentage of the military as they were of the general population (1.5-2%) with some adjustment for class. By this I mean that most non-ultra Orthodox Jews beyond the first generation are of the middle class, upper-middle and upper classes. The bulk of the American military is made up of those from the working and middle classes. Minorities are over-represented in the military as were immigrant groups in the past and still are. So, in short, Jews are no more shirking their responsibilites than are their socio-economic peers.

Thank you for your thoughtful post!

ohhh nice info VRy interesting to read it。

Its like you read my mind! You seem to know so much about this, like you wrote the book in it or something. I think that you could do with some pics to drive the message home a little bit, but other than that, this is magnificent blog. A great read. I will certainly be back.

Without difficulty, the post is really the greatest on this precious topic. I harmonise with your conclusions and also will certainly thirstily look forward to your incoming updates. Just saying thanks will certainly not simply just be sufficient, for the extraordinary lucidity in your writing. I will certainly promptly grab your rss feed to stay abreast of any kind of updates. Genuine work and much success in your business endeavors!

I’ve said that least 3968201 times. The problem this like that is they are just too compilcated for the average bird, if you know what I mean

Me love appointing your provider. Your world wide web layout is extremely easy about the eye. You have a great location to shop. I actually enjoyed navigating together with ordering out of your site. It may be very, very n accessible and convenient to use. Great job using a fabulous website.

been following your weblog for 3 days now and i should say i am starting to like your submit. and now how do i subscribe to your blog?

I’ve said that least 627862 times. The problem this like that is they are just too compilcated for the average bird, if you know what I mean

Heya i am for the first time here. I came across this board and I find It truly useful & it helped me out much. I’m hoping to present one thing back and aid others such as you helped me.

Its great as your other articles :D, thanks for putting up.

Normally I don’t read post on blogs, but I wish to say that this write-up very forced me to try and do it! Your writing style has been amazed me. Thanks, very nice article.

F*ckin’ awesome things hereI am very glad to see your articleThanks a lot and i’m looking forward to contact youWill you kindly drop me a e-mail?

I was very pleased to find this website. I wanted to thank you for your time for this wonderful post!! I definitely enjoy reading it and I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you blog post.

Thanks for these guidelines. One thing I also believe is the fact that credit cards presenting a 0% monthly interest often attract consumers together with

m wanting to style and design by myself weblog along with would choose to understand wherever u received this coming from. cheers

herbcaen says:

As long as Livni holds a government position, Israel could be safer than it is now. It is disappointing for Israel to be represented by officials who forgot the mission statement

Leland Stanford says:

If Israel is not to live in a Balkanized neighborhood, the truely visionary solution is for all the liberal Jews to offer the Palestinean Arabs, who live on the land David walked in Judea and Samaria, to offer up their homes to them. Most Palestineans would rather live in peace and security on the Upper West Side, Crown Heights, Lincolnwood, and Hollywood. So give them justice. Give up your home to them.

Seriously, drawing a line at the Jordan River is a much better solution for a Jewish State. Were it not for the pressure of some nations which supply the US with oil, that would be the sensible solution. It will be five generations before the hatred Arafat and Abbas created in the media will fade. This is not cynical. It is what most Israelis say.


Your comment may be no longer than 2,000 characters, approximately 400 words. HTML tags are not permitted, nor are more than two URLs per comment. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments.

Thank You!

Thank you for subscribing to the Tablet Magazine Daily Digest.
Please tell us about you.

Q&A: Tzipi Livni: The Kadima leader on Peace, American Jews, and Iran

The Kadima leader says Israel is not the safest place in the world for Jews

More on Tablet:

Kerry Links Rise of ISIS With Failed Peace Talks

By Lee Smith — Secretary of State: ‘I see a lot of heads nodding’