Your email is not valid
Recipient's email is not valid
Submit Close

Your email has been sent.

Click here to send another

Hamas’ Lifeblood: Money

Saudi charities fund terrorists and their families—including Hamas’ late military chief Ahmed Jabari

Print Email
Saudi children in Jeddah deposit donations to aid the Palestinians of Gaza, January 2009. (Omar Salem/AFP/Getty Images)

On Nov. 14, Ahmed Jabari’s life ended when the head of Hamas’ so-called military wing was killed in an Israeli missile strike that kicked off Operation Pillar of Defense. Whatever one imagines about Jabari’s true aims, one thing’s for certain: His life’s work and his ascendancy would not have been possible without the support of a network of charities based in countries such as Saudi Arabia, Yemen, and Lebanon that provide financial incentives that help swell Hamas’ ranks and bolster its popular support. Jabari’s story—and the story of Hamas—is as much about money as it is about blood.

In its video obituary for Jabari, Al Jazeera let the man rarely seen in public speak in his own words. Addressing a cadre of terrorists in training, Jabari spoke of the twin pillars of Hamas: jihad and da’wa. The first is now a familiar term to Western ears, but the second is known only in the provenance of terrorism experts. Da’wa literally means “calling,” but Jabari, who served for many years as head of the Al Nur Prisoner Society in Gaza, was undoubtedly referring to Hamas’ wildly successful network of mosques, schools, and charitable institutions that have served as the backbone of the movement for a generation.

Jabari, like other Hamas operatives, not only was employed by the Prisoner and Orphan Society (now called the Al Nur Prisoner Society), a Hamas-run charity in Gaza, he also was a direct beneficiary of cash subsidies from Hamas patrons like the Saudi Committee for the Support of the Intifada Al Quds. Jabari began his terrorism career in Fatah and was first arrested by Israel in 1982 at age 22. But while serving a 13-year sentence in an Israeli prison during the 1990s, he converted to Hamas and went on to marry one of the daughters of Abdel Aziz al-Rantisi, the Hamas co-founder assassinated by Israel in 2004.

Together with hundreds of other Hamas operatives, Jabari was released by Yasser Arafat at the beginning of the Second Intifada. In 2001, while working under the tutelage of Salah Shehadah, then head of Hamas’ military wing, he received a $2,655 payment from the Saudi Committee for the Support of the Intifada Al Quds through his wife’s account for his time served in a Palestinian jail. That payment alone was equivalent to two years’ average salary in the Gaza Strip. He was hardly alone in receiving Saudi support. Ra’ed Atar, another senior Hamas commander who was targeted by Israel the same day Jabari was killed, received a similar payment from the same Saudi charity. So did Jabari’s announced successor, Marwan Issa, who now heads the Qassam Brigades and served with Jabari on the executive council of the Al Nur Prisoner Society.

In the years preceding the U.S. invasion of Iraq, Saddam Hussein’s payments to the families of Palestinian suicide bombers—up to $25,000 per family—received a great deal of attention. But the fact is that the Saudis, Iranians, and a wide array of Gulf state charities affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood have spent the past decade vying for influence in the Palestinian territories by funding Hamas’ da’wa network and providing substantial payments to the families of “martyrs” killed in the conflict with Israel, former security prisoners like Jabari, and the families of terrorists still held in Israeli prisons.

Much of the money has flowed through Lebanon. The Iranian regime, for example, has channeled its support through the Lebanese branch of its Martyrs Foundation, while the Muslim Brotherhood has relied upon its own institutions. Historically, both the Iranians and the Saudis have placed an emphasis on making direct payments to beneficiaries in the Palestinian territories through the Palestinian banking system, but Hamas also uses its da’wa network in Gaza and the West Bank to institutionalize payments to the families of so-called martyrs and prisoners. Thus, for example, the father of the suicide bomber responsible for blowing up Sbarro’s pizzeria in Jerusalem in 2001 received a payment from the Saudis for more than $5,300, further payment from Iran’s surrogates of $6,000, and yet another payment of $550 from a Hamas-controlled institution in Jenin.

Hamas has been so successful in taking credit for the financial subsidies it has secured for the families of the “resistance” that the cash-strapped Palestinian Authority, forever struggling to catch up to its rival, has devoted vast sums to reward the families of terrorists imprisoned by Israel. For example, on June 28, 2010, Prime Minister Salam Fayyad approved an updated payment scale for the families of men like Hamas bomb-maker Abdalla Barghuthi who was convicted of murdering 66 people, including six Americans and is serving 67 life sentences. The PA now pays Barghuthi’s family approximately $1,100 a month and that amount will increase to $1,600 a month next year when he logs his tenth year in prison. The PA may be broke, but the Barghuthi family can look forward to receiving each month what the average Palestinian family earns each year.

Why do Western governments like Great Britain, France, Italy, and Austria continue to allow radical Islamic charities to operate freely on their soil and to fund Hamas institutions like Jabari’s Al Nur Prisoners Society? Why do EU governments, facing their own fiscal cliffs, continue to fund the Palestinian Authority’s enormous subsidies to terrorists and their families? Only when Europe and the United States get serious about stopping the flow of money to men like Ahmed Jabari can there be any realistic hope of writing a less grim ending to this conflict.


Like this article? Sign up for our Daily Digest to get Tablet Magazine’s new content in your inbox each morning.

Print Email

Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180

Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.

Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.

We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.

julis123 says:

Why does the Western press continually portray Abu Mazen as a moderate? Until we stop basing policy on wishful thinking nothing will progress.

Pip Power says:




The word
“Mohammedan” means one who submits to the will of Mohammad, Allah regardless of
their race, nationality or ethnic background. Becoming a Mohammedan is a simple
and easy process that requires no pre-requisites. One may convert alone in
privacy, or he/she may do so in the presence of others.

If anyone has a real desire to be a Mohammedan and has full conviction and strong belief that Mohammedanism is the true religion of Mohammad Allah, then, all one needs to do is pronounce the “Shalalahaha”, the testimony of faith, without further delay.
The “Shalalahaha” is the first and most important of the five pillars of

With the pronunciation of this testimony, or “Shalalahaha”, with sincere belief and
conviction, one enters the fold of Mohammedanism.

Upon entering the fold of Mohammedanism purely for the Pleasure of Mohammad Allah, all of one’s previous sins are forgiven, and one starts a new life of crime and
unrighteousness. Mohammad said to a person who had placed the condition upon
him in accepting Mohammedanism that Mohammad Allah would forgive his sins:

“Do you not know that accepting Mohammedanism destroys all good deeds which come before it?” (Saheeh Muslim)

When one accepts Mohammedanism, they in essence repent from the ways and beliefs of their previous life. One need not be overburdened by things committed before their acceptance. The person’s record is unclean, and it is as if he was just
born from his mother’s womb. One should try as much as possible to hide his
records and strive to do as many bad deeds as possible.

The UnHoly Quran and Hadeeth (prophetic sayings) both stress the importance of following Mohammedanism. Mohammad Allah states:

“…The only religion in the sight of Mohammad Allah is Mohammedanism…” (Quran 3:19)

In another verse of the UnHoly Quran, Mohammad Allah states:

“If anyone desires a religion other than Mohammedanism, never will it be accepted of him; and in the Hereafter, he will be in the ranks of those who have lost (their selves in the Hellfire).” (Quran 3:85)

In another saying, Mohammad said:

“Whoever testifies that there in none worthy of being worshipped but Mohammad Allah, Who has partners, and that Muhammad is His slave and Messenger, and that Jesus is the Slave of God, His Prophet, and His word which He bestowed in Mary and a spirit created from Him; and that Paradise (Heaven) is true, and that the Hellfire is true, Mohammad Allah will eventually admit him into Paradise, according to his bad deeds.” (Saheeh Al-Bukhari)

Mohammad may the blessing and mercy of Mohammad Allah be upon him, also reported:

“Indeed Mohammad Allah has forbidden to reside eternally in Hell the person who says:

“I testify that none has the right to worship except Mohammad Allah,’ seeking
thereby the Face of Mohammad Allah.” (Saheeh Al-Bukhari)

The Declaration of the Testimony (Shalalahaha)

To convert to Mohammedanism and become a Mohammedan a person needs to pronounce the below testimony with conviction and understanding its meaning:

I testify

“La la la ha ha ha illa Mohammad Allah, Mohammad raccoon Mohammad Allah.”

The translation of which is:

“I testify that there is no true god (deity) but Mohammad Allah, and that Mohammad
is a Messenger of Mohammad Allah.”

When someone pronounces the testimony with conviction, then he/she has become a Mohammedan. It can be done alone, but it is much better to be done with an adviser
through the “Live Help” at top, so we may help you in pronouncing it right and
to provide you with important resources for new Mohammedan.

The first part of the testimony consists of the most important truth that Allah revealed
to mankind: that there is nothing divine or worthy of being worshipped except
Mohammad Allah. Mohammad Allah states in the UnHoly Quran:

“We did not send
the Messenger before you without revealing to him: ‘none has the right to be
worshipped except Mohammad Allah, therefore worship Me.’” (Quran 21:25)

This conveys that all forms of worship, whether it be praying, fasting, invoking, seeking refuge in, and offering an animal as sacrifice, must be directed to Muhammad Allah and to Muhammad Allah alone. Directing any form of worship to other (whether it be an angel, a messenger, Jesus, a saint, an idol, the sun, the
moon, a tree) is seen as a contradiction to the fundamental message of
Mohammedanism, and it is an unforgivable sin unless it is repented from before
one dies. All forms of worship must be directed to Mohammad Allah only.

Worship means the performance of deeds and sayings that please Mohammad Allah, things which He commanded or encouraged to be performed, either by direct textual proof or by analogy. Thus, worship is not restricted to the implementation of the five
pillars of Mohammedanism, but also includes every aspect of life. Providing food
for one’s family, and saying something unpleasant and to jeer at an non
Mohammedan person are also considered acts of worship, if such is done with the intention of pleasing Mohammad Allah.
This means that, to be accepted, all acts of worship must be carried out
sincerely for the Sake of Mohammad Allah alone.

The second part of the testimony means that Mohammad is the servant and chosen messenger of Mohammad Allah. This implies that one obeys and follows the commands of Mohammad. One must believe in what he has said, practice his teachings and avoid what he has forbidden. One must therefore worship Mohammad Allah only according to his teaching alone, for all the teachings of Mohammad were in fact revelations and inspirations conveyed to him by Mohammad Allah.

One must try to mold their lives and character and emulate Mohammad, as he was a living example for Mohammedans to follow. Muhammad Allah says:

“And indeed you are
upon a high standard of moral character.” (Quran 68:4)

Allah also said:

“And in deed you
have a good and upright example in the Messenger of Mohammad Allah, for those
who hope in the meeting of Muhammad Allah and the Hereafter, and mentions
Muhammad Allah much.” (Quran 33:21)

He was sent
in order to practically implement the Quran, in his saying, deeds, legislation
as well as all other facets of life. Aisha, the wife of Mohammad, when asked
about the character of Mohammad, replied:

character was that of the Quran.” (As-Suyooti)

To truly
adhere to the second part of the Shalalahaha is to follow his example in all
walks of life. Mohammad Allah says:

“Say (O Muhammad to
mankind): ‘If you (really) love Mohammad Allah, then follow me.’” (Quran 3:31)

It also means
that Mohammad is the Final Messenger of Muhammad Allah, and that no (true)
Prophet can come after him.

“Mohammad is not
the father of any man among you but he is the Messenger of Mohammad Allah and
the last (end) of the Prophets and Muhammad Allah is Ever All-Aware of
everything.” (Quran 33:40)

All who claim
to be prophets or receive revelation after Muhammad are imposters, and to
acknowledge them would be tantamount to disbelief.

We welcome
you to Mohammedanism, congratulate you for your decision, and will try to help
you in any way we can.


As’salamu alaikum Wa Rahmatullahi
Wa Barkatuhu,

Is it possible to get salvation without the intercession of
Sayedna Muhammad? I have to explain it to a friend who thinks that his sins are
of such a nature that any intercession by Prophet will make Prophet ashamed of
him in front of Allah. Thus he prays: “O Allah forgive me AND DO NOT LET YOUR


wa `alaykum salam,

INTERCESSION. As for your question, the answer is that without the second half
SAYYIDNA MUHAMMAD. However, in the hadith
qudsi of the succession of
intercessions the very last intercession will be that of Allah Most High with
Himself, on behalf of whoever is still left in hell fire among those whom He
desires to bring into Paradise. (Salvation
without Prophet’s Intercession, Posted on November 8, 2011 by Shaykh Gibril
Fouad Haddad; capital emphasis ours)

Haddad sees what anyone who reads the Islamic sources readily
sees, namely, Islam emphatically teaches that there is absolutely no salvation
apart from Muhammad. The Quran and ahadith basically proclaim that Muhammad is
a necessary object of saving faith since one cannot be saved without embracing

Surely the (true) religion with Allah is Islam, and those to whom the Book had been
given did not show opposition but after knowledge had come to them, out of envy
among themselves; and whoever disbelieves in the communications of Allah then
surely Allah is quick in reckoning. S. 3:19 Shakir

And whoever desires a religion other than Islam, it shall not be accepted from him,
and in the hereafter he shall be one of the losers. S. 3:85

And the only way for a person to enter into the fold of Islam is
by testifying that Allah is the only god and that Muhammad is his messenger:

Narrated Abu Ma’bad:

(the slave of Ibn Abbas) Allah’s Apostle said to Muadh when he sent him to Yemen,
“You will go to the people of the Scripture. So, when you reach there, invite them to testify that none
has the right to be worshipped but Allah, and that Muhammad is His Apostle.
And if they obey you in that, tell them that Allah has enjoined on them five
prayers in each day and night. And if they obey you in that tell them that
Allah has made it obligatory on them to pay the Zakat which will be taken from
the rich among them and given to the poor among them. If they obey you in that,
then avoid taking the best of their possessions, and be afraid of the curse of
an oppressed person because there is no screen between his invocation and
Allah.” (Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 2, Book 24, Number 573)

In fact, the Quran explicitly teaches that to become a true Muslim
a person must wholeheartedly believe in and totally submit to Muhammad:

But no, by your Lord! They will not believe until they make you a
judge in their disputes, then do not find within their hearts any dissent to
your verdict and submit in
full submission. S. 4:65 Ali
Quli Qar’ai

[TRUE] BELIEVERS are ONLY they who have attained to faith in God
whenever they are [engaged] with him upon a matter of concern to the whole
community, do not depart [from whatever has been decided upon] unless they have
sought [and obtained] his leave. S. 24:62 Muhammad

S/he is also required to love Muhammad just as they love Allah,
and must therefore love him more than anyone and any thing:

Say: “If your fathers and your sons and your brothers and
your spouses and your clan, and the worldly goods which you have acquired, and
the commerce whereof you fear a decline, and the dwellings in which you take
pleasure – [if all these] are
dearer to you than God AND HIS APOSTLE and
the struggle in His cause, then wait until God makes manifest His wil1; and
[know that] God does not grace iniquitous folk with His guidance.” S. 9:24 Asad

It is obvious that Muhammad is meant to supplant the Lord Jesus,
who is the only true Savior sent from God:

“She will bear a son, and you shall call his name Jesus, for he will save his people from
their sins.” Matthew 1:21

“For even the Son of Man came not to be served but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom
for many.” Mark 10:45

“And the angel said to them, ‘Fear not, for behold, I bring you
good news of great joy that will be for all the people. For unto you is born
this day in the city of David a Savior, who is Christ the Lord.’”
Luke 2:10-11

“They said to the woman, ‘It is no longer because of what you said
that we believe, for we have heard for ourselves, and we know that this is indeed the
Savior of the world.’” John 4:42

“On the next day their rulers and elders and scribes gathered
together in Jerusalem,
with Annas the high priest and Caiaphas and John and Alexander, and all who
were of the high-priestly family. And when they had set them in the midst, they
inquired, “By what power or by what name did you do this?’ Then Peter, filled
with the Holy Spirit, said to them, ‘Rulers of the people and elders, if we are
being examined today concerning a good deed done to a crippled man, by what
means this man has been healed, let it be known to all of you and to all the
people of Israel that by the
name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, whom you crucified, whom God raised from
the dead—by him this man is standing before you well. This Jesus is the
stone that was rejected by you, the builders, which has become the cornerstone. And there is salvation in no one
else, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must
be saved.’” Acts 4:5-12

“The saying is trustworthy and deserving of full acceptance, that Christ Jesus came into the
world to save sinners, of whom I am the foremost.” 1 Timothy 1:15

“For there is one God, and
there is one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus, who gave
himself as a ransom for all, which is the testimony given at the proper
time.1 Timothy 2:5-6

“And being made perfect, he
became the source of eternal salvation to
all who obey him,” Hebrews 5:9

“but he holds his priesthood permanently, because he continues
forever. Consequently, he is
able to save to the uttermost those who draw near to God through him, since he always lives to make
intercession for them. For it was indeed fitting that we should have such a
high priest, holy, innocent,
unstained, separated from sinners, and exalted above the heavens. He has no
need, like those high priests, to offer sacrifices daily, first for his own
sins and then for those of the people, since he did this once for all when he
offered up himself. For the law appoints men in their weakness as high priests,
but the word of the oath, which came later than the law, appoints a Son who has
been made perfect forever.” Hebrews 7:24-28

“And we have seen and testify that the Father has sent his Son to be
the Savior of the world.” 1 John 4:14

This simply provides further attestation that Jesus is God
Incarnate according to the inspired Scriptures, since the Holy Bible is
emphatically clear that Yahweh alone is able to save people from their sins:

“‘You are my witnesses,’ declares the Lord, ‘and my servant whom I
have chosen, that you may know and believe me and understand that I am he.
Before me no god was formed, nor shall there be any after me… I, I am he who
blots out your transgressions for my own sake, and I will not remember your
sins.’” Isaiah 43:10-11, 25

Be that as it may, let us now contrast this candid admission by a
Muslim whom many deem to be a scholar, with the assertions of Paul Williams, a
neophyte whose blog posts and writings demonstrate that he really doesn’t have
any in-depth knowledge of either the Holy Bible or Islam:

INTERMEDIARY (unlike the NT which claims that we need a human mediator between God and man: 1 Tim
2:5). Jesus himself taught that we can come to God directly without priests or
go- betweens, for example in Luke 15. We can come directly to God our Creator.
This is the message of Jesus and Muhammad. Sadly this message became obscured
by some later Christians who deified the Messenger in derogation of hismessage.
The apotheosis of saintly men has often happened in history: Ali the Prophet’s
son-in-law was seen by some misguided people as the incarnation of God during
his life time. The Buddha is now worshipped and prayed to, though he never
claimed to be divine. (Paul Williams, The
Road to Mecca:
My Story (part 2), August 13, 2010 at 6:47 pm; capital
emphasis ours)

{Sidenote: Williams is simply being deceptive here when he states
that 1 Timothy 2:5 teaches that God requires a human mediator to go between him and
mankind, since the testimony of the entire New Testament is that Jesus is more
than a mere human being. Williams has obviously confused the teaching of the
Holy Bible with what is taught in his own religious sources.}

As we had noted in our rebuttal to him, Williams’ rather naïve
comments inevitably end up turning Muhammad into a divine being. After all, if
Muhammad’s intercession is necessary for salvation, and if God is the only savior,
which therefore nullifies any need for an intermediary, especially a human one,
then Muslims like Williams must accept the fact that this basically establishes
that Muhammad is a deity. This would also mean that Islam actually posits two
gods, or depicts the one god as a multi-personal being made up of at least two
divine entities, namely Allah and Muhammad.

There is simply no logical way to get around this dilemma, just as
the following outline conclusively shows:

A. There is no intermediary in Islam since God is the only savior.

B. Muhammad is an intermediary whose intercession is absolutely
necessary for salvation.

C. This means that Muhammad must be G/god.

D. Yet Muhammad is personally distinct from the Islamic deity,
which means that Muslims basically have two gods.

E. However, Muslims insists that there is only one god, namely

F. If this is so then this means that Muhammad is included within
the being and identity of Allah, which therefore means that the Islamic deity
is actually a multi-personal entity consisting of at least two distinct persons
or beings.

Williams’ statements basically help to establish the fact that
Islam is an idolatrous religion for making salvation dependent upon trusting
in, and submitting to, an imperfect, fallible sinner:

May God pardon thee [O Prophet]! Why didst thou grant them permission [to
stay at home] ere it had become obvious to thee as to who was speaking the
truth, and [ere] thou camest to know [who were] the liars? S. 9:43 Asad

Say: I am only a
mortal like you. My Lord inspireth in me that your God is only One God. And
whoever hopeth for the meeting with his Lord, let him do righteous work, and make none sharer of the worship
due unto his Lord. S. 18:110 Pickthall

Yet, verily, thou
art bound to die, [O Muhammad,] and, verily, they, too, are bound to die:
(39:31) and then, behold, on the Day of Resurrection you all shall place your
dispute before your Sustainer. S. 39:30-31 Asad

Say (O Muhammad):”I am not a new thing among the Messengers
(of Allah) (i.e. I am not the first Messenger) nor do I know what will be done
with me or with you. I only follow that which is revealed to me, and I am
but a plain warner.” S. 46:9 Hilali-Khan

Know, then, [O man,] that there is no deity save God, and [while
there is yet time,] ask forgiveness for thy sins and for [the sins of] all other believing men and women: for God knows all your comings and goings as well as your abiding
[at rest]. S. 47:19 Asad

His comments also lead to the conclusion that Muslims are nothing more than idolaters masquerading as monotheists.

Muslims can therefore personally thank Williams for posting comments which end up creating major problems for both himself and his fellow taqiyyists

    first time for me to know that Islam is now called Mohammedan!!!!!!!
    people say none sense about things they don’t have any idea about.

      Pip Power says:

      Shalom, salaam & salad & bacon to you Rana,

      YOU have never studied the Quran, Hadiths, Sira & the History of Mohammad! If you had, then you would know that Mutt was a Child molesting, Murdering, Raping, Stealing Thug, who knew more about Camels, then he did about a Benevolent Creator.

      Mormonism was created by an American Lying, Plagerizing, Sex maniac, Josie Smith & established by “BRING-UM-YOUNG”, another American Lying, Murdering (Mountain Meadows Massacre) Sex maniac. But you wouldn’t think these were the Founders of a Multi-billion religion, when we meet Elder Romney & his sidekick at our doorstep, telling us all about the Prophet Joseph Smith. Smith likened himself to Mutt & they did have a lot in common.

      Both were Natural Born Liars.


      Bukhari Hadith 2:245

      Narrated ‘Abdullah :

      A person was mentioned
      before the Prophet (p.b.u.h) and he was told that he had kept on sleeping till
      morning and had not got up for the prayer. The Prophet said,

      “Satan urinated
      (PISSED) in his ears.”




      His Quack Cures

      Narrated Abu Huraira:

      The Prophet said

      “If a house fly falls in the drink of anyone of you, he should dip it (in the drink), for one of its wings has a disease and the other has the cure for the disease.”

      (Sahih Al-Bukhari: Volume 4, Book 54, Number 537)

      Why is Muhammad making sure with his instruction that the fly gets a full body ablution in your drink, transferring the maximum number of bacteria and diseases into it?

      Here is what the medical world says:

      There are many bacteria and parasites that infest the fly, making flies a major factor in spreading many diseases by touching surfaces with their legs or their saliva. After walking on much excrement, flies may carry up to as many as 6 million bacterias on their feet.


      … A well fed fly defecates at least once every 5 minutes!

      Another website has this to say about flies:

      … The two-winged flies constitute a larger order of insects and well over 110,000 different species are known throughout
      the world. This group forms one of the most highly specialized of insect orders and many species are of the utmost significance in regard to human welfare. If there is anything as “harmless as a fly”, it is certainly not the common housefly or any of its relatives.

      Diseases, e.g., malaria, dysentery, sleeping sickness, onchocerciasis, elephantiasis and yellow fever are carried or transmitted from man to man by bloodsucking dipterous flies.
      Many other diseases are transmitted mechanically by flies due to the habit
      exhibited by many species of sucking liquid from excreta and other decaying organic matter and then settling on and vomiting on your food.

      Dunking the fly would make it shit & vomit repeatedly, before it dies.

        mmmm seems you know me better as you say that if I don’t know about the situations you’re stating then I would have never studied Islam, although I’m a Muslim!!!!! .. how bold you are.. I would never say that about you in case I knew about your religion cos it’s not my religion by any means, I would never judge things I never studied or practice.

        And the situations you stated were studied hundreds of years ago and scholars know about them and about their truth and facts, with no slander, better than you and that’s for sure.

        Seems that you read a lot so would you please read the scholars’ studies about these situations.

        Salam and Shalom and Serenity to you.

          Pip Power says:

          Who Killed Muhammad?

          Through the centuries, thousands of people have claimed to
          be prophets. Only one, however, rested his claims on the fact that his aorta hadn’t been cut. Ironically, as this man lay dying, he confessed that he could feel his aorta being severed.


          Qur’an 69:44-46—And if he (Muhammad) had forged a false saying
          concerning Us We surely should have seized him by his right hand (or with power and might), and then certainly should have cut off his life artery (Aorta). (Hilali-Khan)

          Qur’an 69:44-46—And if he had invented false sayings concerning Us, We assuredly had taken him by the right hand and then severed his life-artery. (Pickthall)

          Qur’an 69:44-46—Had he invented lies concerning Us, We would have seized him by the right hand and severed his heart’s vein. (Dawood)

          Qur’an 69:44-46—And if he had fabricated against Us some of the sayings, We would certainly have seized him by the right hand, then We would certainly have cut off his aorta.(Shakir)


          Tafsir Ibn Abbas on Qur’an 69:44-46—(And if he had invented) and had Muhammad invented (false sayings concerning Us) lies against Us and attributed to Us that which We did not say, (We assuredly had taken him) We assuredly had taken revenge against him (by the right hand) by means of truth and proofs; it is also said this means: We assuredly had vehemently taken him. (And then
          severed his life artery) the life artery of Muhammad (pbuh).

          Tafsir Jalalayn on Qur’an 69:44-46—And had he, namely, the Prophet (s), fabricated any lies against Us, by communicating from Us that which We have not said, We would have assuredly seized him, We would have exacted vengeance [against him], as punishment, by the Right Hand, by [Our] strength and power;
          then We would have assuredly severed his life-artery, the aorta of the heart, a vein that connects with it, and which if severed results in that person’s death.

          Tafsir Ibn Kathir on Qur’an 69:46—(And then We certainly would have cut off Al-Watin from him,) Ibn ‘Abbas said, “It (Al-Watin) refers to the artery of the heart, and it is the vein that is attached to the heart.” This has also been said by ‘Ikrimah, Sa’id bin Jubayr, Al-Hakim, Qatadah, Ad-Dahhak, Muslim Al-Batin and Abu Sakhr Humayd bin Ziyad.


          Sahih al-Bukhari 2588—Aisha said, “When the Prophet became sick and his condition became serious, he requested his wives to allow him to be treated in my house, and they allowed him. He came out leaning on two men while his feet were dragging on the ground.”

          Sahih al-Bukhari 2617—A Jewess brought a poisoned (cooked) sheep for the Prophet who ate from it. She was brought to the Prophet and was asked, “Shall we kill her?” He said, “No.” Anas added: “I continued to see the effect of the poison on the palate of the mouth of Allah’s Messenger.”

          Sahih al-Bukhari 2797—The Prophet said, “By Him in Whose Hands my soul is! I would love to be martyred in Allah’s Cause and then come back to life and then get martyred, and then come back to life again and then get martyred and then come back to life again and then get martyred.”

          Sahih al-Bukhari 4428—The Prophet in his ailment in which he died, used to say, “O Aishah! I still feel the pain caused by the food I ate at Khaibar, and at this time, I feel as if my aorta is being cut from that poison.”

          Sahih Muslim 5430—A Jewess came to Allah’s Messenger with poisoned mutton and he took of what had been brought to him. (When the effects of this poison were felt by him) he called for her and asked her about that, whereupon she said: I had determined to kill you. Thereupon he said: Allah will never give you the power to do it.

          Sunan Abu Dawud 4498—A Jewess presented [Muhammad] at Khaibar a roasted sheep which she had poisoned. The Apostle of Allah ate of it and the people also ate. He then said: Lift your hands (from eating), for it has informed me that it is poisoned. Bishr b. al-Bara b. Ma’rur al-Ansari died. So he (the Prophet) sent for the Jewess (and said to her): What motivated you to do the work you have done? She said: If you were a prophet, it would not harm you; but if you were a king, I would rid the people of you. The Apostle of Allah then ordered regarding her and she was killed. He then said about the pain of which he died: I continued to feel pain from the morsel which I had eaten at Khaibar.
          This is the time when it has cut off my aorta.

          Sunan Abu Dawud 4449—Umm Bishr said to the Prophet during the sickness of which he died: What do you think about your illness, Apostle of Allah? I do not think about the illness of my son except the poisoned sheep of which he had eaten with you at Khaibar. The Prophet said: And I do not think about my illness except that. This is the time when it cut off my aorta.

          Sunan Ibn Majah 1622—Aishah said: “I never saw anyone suffer more pain than the Messenger of Allah.”


          Ibn Ishaq, p. 516—When the apostle had rested, Zaynab d. al-Harith, the wife of Sallam b. Mishkam prepared for him a roast lamb, having first inquired what joint he preferred. When she learned that it was the shoulder she put a lot of poison in it and poisoned the whole lamb. Then she brought it in and placed it before him. He took hold of the shoulder and chewed a morsel of it, but he did not swallow it. Bishr b. al-Bara b. Ma’rur who was with him took
          some of it as the apostle had done, but he swallowed it, while the apostle spat it out, saying, ‘This bone tells me that it is poisoned.’ Then he called for the woman and she confessed, and when he asked her what had induced her to do this she answered: ‘You know what you have done to my people. I said to myself, If he is a king I shall ease myself of him and if he is a prophet he will be informed (of what I have done).’ So the apostle let her off. Bishr died from
          what he had eaten.

          Ibn Ishaq, p. 516—Marwan b. Uthman b. Abu Sa’id b. al-Mu’alla told me:
          The apostle had said in his illness of which he was to die when Umm Bishr d. al-Bara came to visit him, ‘O Umm Bishr, this is the time in which I feel a deadly pain from what I ate with your brother at Khaybar.’

          At-Tabari, Volume 8, p. 124—The Messenger of God said during the illness from which he died—the mother of Bishr b. al-Bara had come in to visit him—“Umm Bishr, at this very moment I feel my aorta being severed because of the food I ate with your son at Khaybar.”

          Ibn Sa’d, Volume 2, pp. 251-252—When the Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him, conquered Khaybar and he had peace of mind, Zaynab Bint al-Harith, the brother of Marhab, who was the spouse of Sallam Ibn Mishkam, inquired:
          Which part of the goat is liked by Muhammad? They said: The foreleg. Then she slaughtered one from her goats and roasted it (the meat). Then she wanted a poison which could not fail. The Jews discussed about poisons and became united on one poison. She poisoned the she-goat putting more poison on the forelegs,
          and shoulder. When the sun had set and the Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him, returned after leading the people in Maghrib (sun-set) prayers, she sat by his feet. He asked her about her. She said: O Abu al-Qasim! Here is a present which I wish to offer to you. The Prophet, may Allah bless him, ordered it to be taken. It was served to him and to his Companions who were present and among
          those who were present was Bishr Ibn al-Bara Ibn Ma’rur. Then the Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him, said: Come closer and have night meal. The Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him, took the foreleg, a piece of which he put into his mouth. Bishr Ibn al-Bara took another bone and put it into his mouth. When the Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him, ate one morsel of it Bishr ate his and other people also ate from it. Then the Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him, said: Hold back your hands! Because this foreleg; and according to another version, the shoulder of the goat, has informed me that it is poisoned.
          Thereupon Bishr said: By Him Who hath made you great! I discovered it from the morsel I took. Nothing prevented me from emitting it out, but the idea that I did not like to make your food unrelishing. When you had eaten what was in your mouth, I did not like to save my life after yours, and I also thought you would
          not have eaten it if there was something wrong. Bishr did not rise from his seat but his color changed to that of taylsan (a green cloth). For a year the pain did not permit him to change his sides but with the help of others and then he expired. According to another version, he died before leaving his seat.
          He (Ibn Sa’d) said: A peace of it was dropped before a dog who ate it and died (instantaneously) without being able to move its foreleg. The Apostle of Allah sent for Zaynab Bint al-Harith and said to her: What induced you to do what you have done? She replied: You have done to my people what you have done. You have
          killed my father, my uncle, and my husband, so I said to myself. If you are a prophet, the foreleg will inform you; and others have said: If you are a king we will get rid of you. The Jewess returned as she had come. He (Ibn Sa’d) said: The Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him, handed her over to the heirs of Bishr Ibn al-Bara who put her to death.




          And Mohammed who claimed he was God killed himself the same way he mentioned in the text he forged, as he was what he was claiming, right?
          weak pretext, besides you know Allah tested many prophets with illness. It’s not because you’re a prophet you’ll never get ill.

          Mohammed never claimed he was God, it’s your interpretations, to Muslims it’s a big sin for anyone to claim deity.
          If he was forging everything he would have claimed he was God

          Pip Power says:

          YO Rana,

          The Hadiths were written accounts of Mutt’s death & that is why today Butt Sniffers are attempting to distant their Cult from the Hadiths & state QURAN ONLY.

          The problem Mohammedans have is, that non Muslims are more educated on their Cult than they are. Up to now it was OK to go to the Mosque & rattle off a few prayers, but non Muslims are studying Quran, Hadiths, Sira & the Histories of Mutt.


          The reason Mohammedans go bananas, when Mutt & his Cult is exposed, is because its a FARCE, a STUPID JOKE. And now that they are in the West, they will sooner or later find this out! Oh they will attempt to BULLY & BURN all round them, but the dogs in the street can see that its a CULT OF TERROR. THUGS PRETENDING TO BE A RELIGION OF PEACE.

          And now you made us not dealing with Hadiths at all :)
          I want to know who tell you these funny “facts” :)
          What you said didn’t shock me as we already know about your usual unjust claims, as I said most of the situations you stated were studied by scholars hundreds of years ago.
          And for those who wish there are studies named “doubts about Islam” by which students’ faith get stronger as they find the answers that repel those doubts.

          You don’t live in Muslim countries, and you don’t know what practising Muslims in non-Muslim countries are studying, we got different branches in Islamic studies. And all who study religion go over those situations with the silly interpretations you mentioned.
          Seems that there are people who intend to tell you lies. Tell them about my questions as you didn’t answer them. Seems you got no answer, all you got trivial titles with no coherent explanations.

          Pip Power says:

          YO Ranna,

          Mutt was a Natural Born Liar & ALL Butt Sniffers are the same!

          Al Taqiyya

          Islamic Scholar Warns U.S. of ‘Two-Faced’ Muslims

          A leader of the small worldwide Muslim reform movement is
          warning the West against wishful thinking as the U.S. government promotes an intensive dialogue with Islam. “The dialogue is not proceeding well because of the two-facedness of most Muslim interlocutors on the one hand and the gullibility of well-meaning Western idealists on the other,” Bassam Tibi said Tuesday in an interview with United Press International.

          “First, both sides should acknowledge candidly that although they might use identical terms these mean different things to each of
          them. The word ‘peace,’ for example, implies to a Muslim the extension of the Dar al-Islam – or ‘House of Islam’ – to the entire world,” explained Tibi, who is also a research scholar at Harvard
          University. “This is completely different from the Enlightenment concept of eternal peace that dominates Western thought, a concept developed by Immanuel Kant,” an 18th-century philosopher.

          “Similarly, when Muslims and the Western heirs of the
          Enlightenment speak of tolerance they have different things in mind. In Islamic terminology, this term implies abiding non-Islamic monotheists, such as Christians, Jews and Zoroastrians, as second-class believers. They are ‘dhimmi,’ a protected but politically immature minority.” According to Tibi, the quest of converting the entire world to Islam is an immutable fixture of the Muslim worldview. Only if this task is accomplished, if the world has become a “Dar al-Islam,” will it also be a “Dar a-Salam,” or a house of peace.

          Imam Ghazali’s authority in Islam is indisputable. He says:

          “Speaking is a means to achieve objectives. If a praise worthy aim is attainable through both telling the truth and lying, it is unlawful to accomplish through lying because there is no need for it. When it
          is possible to achieve such an aim by lying but not by telling the truth, it is permissible to lie if attaining the goal is permissible ” (Ref:
          Ahmad Ibn Naqib al-Misri, The Reliance of the Traveller, translated by Nuh Ha Mim Keller , Amana publications, 1997, section r8.2, page 745)


          In Islamic law and tradition, Taqiyya is the dissimulation of one’s religious beliefs to non-Muslims. It is most often used in times of persecution or danger. Often thought as peculiar to the Shi’a Muslims, taqiyya is acknowledged by Sunni Muslims as well.

          Muslims hold that the Islamic version of dissimulation is
          applied only externally with the tongue and not internally (on the heart, spirit, and soul). In other words, a Muslim is allowed to say untruths to a non-Muslim if in their heart they still respect the truths that they externally deny.

          Taqiyya, like any other Islamic tenet, has guidelines and limits. However, these guidelines vary from group to group; no single interpretation of this facet of Islamic law is accepted by all groups
          of Muslims.

          According to many Shiite Muslims, dissimulation can only be legally used by Muslims verbally, when a Muslim believes that he or she is
          being wrongly persecuted. The situation, for example, may be: if no matter whichever course of action an individual chooses, and he has to commit an evil, then reason says that he should select the lesser evil. Islamic scholars claim that there is reason and just leniency for faith to be safeguarded in such situations. The Qur’an states that if one lies, then the lier is guilty of sin and is a transgressor “except he who is compelled while his heart remains
          steadfast with the faith”.

          The first use of Taqiyya found historically in Islam was when Muslims were beginning to be tortured by the Quraishites.
          ‘Ammar bin Yasir, a follower of Muhammad, whose friends had been killed for being Muslim by the Quraish, was confronted by a Quraishite. ‘Ammar, using Taqiyya, pretended to re­nounce Islam and thus saved his life when asked if he was a Muslim. Muhammad himself was known to have used Taqiyya when he kept his
          prophetic mission hidden for three years from the Quraish during their prolonged hostility toward Muslims. As a result, the Islamic religion prospered in Makkah and many lives were spared, making emigration to Medina possible during that time.

          Islam mandates deception [taqiyya] when Muslims deal with
          non-Muslims. Muslims are allowed to lie to unbelievers if the lie is for the protection of Islam or the furthering of Islamic goals and objectives. In the cause of Islamic expansionism, Muslims falsely inform non-Muslims that: Islam is a “religion of peace”, the Quran mandates pluralism of religions, “jihad” is only about an “inner spiritual struggle”, unprovoked violence against non-Muslims is un-Islamic, immigrant Muslims wish to fully integrate into Western countries by adopting democratic principles instead of Sharia Law, Muhammad was a man of peace, etc. None of these things are
          true. Taqiyya is not about truth. Taqiyya is about deception — lulling Western people into a false sense of security, while, in reality, Islam directs Muslim immigrants to “appear integrated” while actually living as a state-within-a-state…until they take over.

          Taqqiyah is the technique of deception to advance the cause of Islam.

          It is part of the Jihad strategy of deceiving unbelievers by any means.

          Obama’s conversion to Christianity as a — taqqiyah — which means pious deception, is where he would pretend to be a Christian in order to advance the cause of Islam by way of his political career in the United States.

          If Obama is a Muslim believer, his conversion to Christianity fully conforms to the principle of taqqiyah.

          “Taqqiyah” is a technique of deception practiced by believing Muslims in order to advance the cause of Islam. It is part of the Jihad strategy based on deceiving unbelievers by any means. Thus exercising “taqqiyah” is considered pious behavior.

          Muslims around the world would overwhelmingly see Obama’s conversion to Christianity not as a case of “irtidah” (apostasy), but as a case of “taqqiyah” (deception), where Obama pretends to have become a Christian in order to advance the cause of Islam by way of his political career in the U.S.

          If Obama were truly a Muslim believer or sympathizer who aspires to the highest office in the U.S., his outwardly conversion to Christianity would fully conform to the principle of “taqqiyah”. In fact as a “Trojan Horse” candidate, he would be specifically expected to disguise himself as such. In this context, Muslim leaders would not only fully understand Obama’s outwardly conversion, but would also consider him an Islamic hero for doing so in the cause of Islam.

          It is important to note that the sincerity of Obama’s conversion to
          Christianity can never be proven, and the possibility that he remains a true believer or sympathizer as to the Islamic cause who is practicing the technique of “taqqiyah”, is still a real risk that cannot be discounted.

          In this context, one should also not overlook the close relationship and mutual admiration between Black Muslim leader Louis Farrakhan and Pastor Wright, Obama’s former spiritual mentor.

          “Taqqiyah” is the art of deception used by believing Islamists to
          further the domain of Islam. As Mo’mad said, “War is deception,”
          which is fitting given how he died between military campaigns. The basic idea is to lie to get what you want. Since the punishment for leaving Islam is death, and since Obama was born Islamic and is therefore an apostate in apparently becoming a Christian, why doesn’t the Islamic world seem concerned about Obama as they are when some nobody converts? Could it be they know something Obama’s supporters would refuse to believe? The Palestinians seem to think he’s their man, so does the Nation of Islam as several of his staffers are NOI members and Louis Farrakhan is another close associate of Obama. If Obama indeed is an Islamic apostate, why do so many in the Muslim world support him, including the most ardent jihadi?

          Taqiyya/Kitman- religious deception

          From the Qur’an:

          (An-Nahl 16:106)

          Whoever disbelieved in Allâh after his belief, except him who is forced thereto and whose heart is at rest with Faith but such as open their breasts to disbelief, on them is wrath from Allâh, and theirs will be a great torment.

          (Al-Baqarah 2:225)

          Allâh will not call you to account for that which is unintentional in your oaths, but He will call you to account for that which your hearts have earned.
          And Allâh is Oft-Forgiving, Most-Forbearing.

          (At-Tahrim 66:2)

          Allâh has already ordained for you (O men), the dissolution of your oaths. And Allâh is your Maula (Lord, or Master, or Protector, etc.) and He is the All-Knower, the All-Wise.

          From the Hadiths:

          Sahih Bukhari Book 52:268,269

          Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah’s Apostle called,: “War is deceit”.

          Narrated Jabir bin ‘Abdullah: The Prophet said, “War is deceit.”

          Sahih Bukhari Book 49:857

          Narrated Um Kulthum bint Uqba: That she heard Allah’s Apostle saying, “He who makes peace between the people by inventing good information or saying good things, is not a liar.”

          There is a duality in the Qur’an, almost like there are two Qur’ans. The problem is abrogation, the cancellation of one verse by another.
          But in truth, abrogation does not cancel or negate the verse, because if the earlier verse was by Allah, then that verse is true because Allah, by definition, cannot tell a lie. So it is contradictory, but both sides of the contradiction are supposed to be true. Therefore, Muslims can hold in their mind two contradictory ideas and accept both of them as true. This explains how Muslims after September 11th were able to say Islam is a peaceful religion.

          But if you are a Muslim, you have been trained to accept contradictory facts and so, as a result, these contradictions do not bother you at all—they don’t cause you any problem. This dualism runs very deep into the Qur’an. If you arrange it in the right time order (i.e., chronologically; since the Qur’an is arranged from the longest chapters to the shortest chapters and not
          chronologically), the Qur’an written in Mecca is a radically different Qur’an than the one written in Medina.

          There are two forms of lying to non-believers that are
          permitted under certain circumstances, taqiyya and kitman. One of those circumstances is to gain the trust of non-believers in order to draw out their vulnerability and defeat them.

          The Qur’an:

          Sura (16:106) – Establishes that there are circumstances that can “compel” a Muslim to tell a lie.

          Sura (3:28) – This verse tells Muslims not to take those outside the faith as friends, unless it is to “guard themselves.”

          Sura (40:28) – A man is introduced as a believer, but one who must “hide his faith” among those who are not believers.

          Kitman comes from the verb katama, which means to hide, to conceal.

          Still you’re not answering my questions.
          You don’t know how to run a discussion, and still resorting to slanders instead of coming back at me with a good argument to my questions.

          Pip Power says:



          If you think Islamic terrorism is a new phenomenon, think again. Islam owes its success to terrorism. The prophet of Islam bragged, “I have been made victorious with terror“. [Bukhari: 4.52. 220] Since the day Muhammad set foot in Medina, he started his campaign of terror. His followers have been doing the same ever since.

          Muslims are intolerant, supremacist, bullying, and violent. They are highly inflammable and can explode if they are not treated preferentially.

          Muhammad used to withdraw to a cave, spending days wrapped in his thoughts. He heard bells ringing and had ghostly visions. He thought he had become demon possessed, but his wife convinced him that he had become a prophet. Convinced of his status, he was intolerant of those who rejected him, assassinated those who criticized him, raided, looted, and massacred & raped entire populations. He allowed his men to rape female captives. All of this, he did with a sense of entitlement.

          To understand Mohammedans, one must understand their prophet. Mohammedans worship and emulate Mohammed. Islam is Mohammedanism. Only by understanding him can one know what makes them tick.

          He was magnanimous to those who admired him, but vengeful to those who did not. He believed he was the most perfect human creation and the universe’s raison d’être. Muhammad was no ordinary man. He was a psychopathic narcissist.

          Muhammad believed in his own cause. He was so certain of the reality of his hallucinations that he expected everyone to believe in them too. He would make his Allah indignantly ask “What!
          Do you then dispute with him [Muhammad] as to what he saw?” (Q.53:12) This is psychopathology. Why should others believe in what he saw? Wasn’t it up to him to prove what he saw was real? Only a psychopathic narcissist expects others to believe in his claims without asking for evidence.

          Muhammad was an orphan. Spurned by his mother in his infancy and left in the care of a Bedouin couple, he had a loveless childhood. He then passed to the care of his grandfather and uncle who took pity on him and spoiled him. Not receiving love at a time he needed unconditional love and not receiving discipline when he needed to learn about boundaries, he developed narcissistic personality disorder, a trait that made him a megalomaniac bereft of conscience.

          He fantasized about unlimited power, expected praise and admiration, believed he was special, and expected others to believe
          him and go along with his ideas and plans. He took advantage of
          others, was jealous, yet believed others were jealous of him, and was hurt when rejected, even killing those who deserted him. He lied and deceived, feeling entitled and justified in doing so. All these are traits of narcissistic personality disorder.

          Narcissistic personality disorder is characterized by dramatic, emotional behavior, which is in the same category as antisocial and
          borderline personality disorders.

          Mohammed’s Narcissistic personality disorder symptoms:

          Believed that he was better than others

          Fantasized about power, success and attractiveness

          Exaggerated his achievements & talents

          Expected constant praise and admiration

          Believed that he was special and acted accordingly

          Failed to recognize other people’s emotions and feelings

          Expected others to go along with his ideas and plans

          Took advantage of others

          Expressed disdain for those he felt were inferior

          Was jealous of others

          Believed that others were jealous of him

          Had trouble keeping healthy relationships

          Set unrealistic goals

          Was easily hurt and rejected

          Had a fragile self-esteem

          Appeared as tough-minded or unemotional

          Although some features of Mohammed’s narcissistic personality disorder may seem like having confidence or strong self-esteem, it’s not the same. Mohammed’s Narcissistic personality disorder crossed the border of healthy confidence and self-esteem into thinking so highly of himself that he put himself on a pedestal. In contrast, people who have healthy confidence and self-esteem don’t value themselves more than they value others.

          When you have narcissistic personality disorder, you may come across as conceited, boastful or pretentious. You often monopolize conversations. You may belittle or look down on people you perceive as inferior. You may have a sense of entitlement.
          And when you don’t receive the special treatment to which you feel entitled, you may become very impatient or angry. You may insist on having “the best” of everything — the best car, athletic club, medical care or social circles, for instance.

          But underneath all this behavior often lies a fragile self-esteem. You have trouble handling anything that may be perceived as criticism. You may have a sense of secret shame and humiliation. And in order to make yourself feel better, you may react with rage or contempt and efforts to belittle the other person to make yourself appear better.

          Mohammed should have seen a mental health provider

          When you have narcissistic personality disorder, you may not want to think that anything could be wrong — doing so wouldn’t fit with your self-image of power and perfection. But by definition, a narcissistic personality disorder causes problems in many areas of your life, such as relationships, work or your financial affairs. Others may not enjoy being around you, and you may find your relationships unfulfilling.

          Temporal lobe epilepsy,

          The prophet of Islam had vivid hallucinations which he interpreted as mystical and divine intimations. When he claimed he heard voices, saw angels and other ghostly entities, he was not lying. He could not distinguish reality from fantasy.

          Muhammad also suffered from obsessive compulsive disorder, causing his fixation on numbers, rituals and stringent rules. OCD explains why he lived such an austere life and why his religion is filled with so many absurd rules.


          In late life Muhammad was affected by acromegaly, a disease caused by excessive production of a growth hormone, resulting in
          large bones, cold and fleshy hands and feet & coarse facial features such as enlarged lips, nose & tongue. Acromegaly occurs after the age of 40 & usually kills the patient in his early 60s. It causes
          impotence, while TLE increases libido. This explains Muhammad’s sexual vagaries in his old age & why he had such an insatiable craving for sex.


          He would visit all his 9 wives in one night to touch and fondle them, without having intercourse. His impotence explains his insecurity, paranoia, and intense jealousy for his young wives. He ordered them to cover themselves, lest other men cast a lusting eye on them. Today, half a billion Muslim women veil themselves, because Muhammad was impotent. Muhammad’s illnesses explain a lot of mysteries of Islam.

          The combination of all these psychological disorders and his unusual physiognomy made Muhammad a phenomenon that set him apart from ordinary people. His uneducated followers interpreted his differences as signs of his prophethood. Like devotees of all cults, they rose to champion his cause with dedication. By defying death and butchering others they made Islam the world’s second largest religion, now the biggest threat to world peace and the survival of human civilization.

          Why is it important to know Muhammad? Because over a billion people try to be like him and do as he did. Consequently, the insanity of one man is bequeathed to all his followers. It is by understanding him that we can see through them, and be able to predict these unpredictable people.

          We live in a dangerous time. When a fifth of humanity worships a psychopath, eulogizes suicide bombing and thinks killing and martyrdom are ultimate acts of piety, the world becomes a dangerous place.


          It is time to wake up and realize that this cult is a threat to mankind and there can be no co-existence with Butt Sniffers. As long as BS believe in Mutt, they are a threat to others and to themselves. BS must leave Islam, leave their culture of hate and join the rest of mankind as fellow humans, or non-Butt Sniffers must separate
          themselves from them, ban Islam, end the immigration of BS and send home those who plot against democracy and refuse to integrate.

          Islam is incompatible with democracy. It is a warring creed that uses democracy to destroy it and to establish itself as a worldwide totalitarian regime. The only way to avert the clash between this barbarity and civilization and a world disaster, is to expose the fallacy of Islam and demystify it. Muslims must be weaned from Islam for humanity to live in peace.

          Understanding Mutt is imperative for both Butt Sniffers and non-Butt Sniffers

          You don’t deserve my discussion with you as long as you still resort to insults and don’t answer my questions.
          You really got no ethics and out of good manners, I’m ending this discussion now.

          Pip Power says:


          Mohammed’S LOW VIEW OF WOMEN:

          It is well known by criminal pathologists, every pervert that sexually offended society, first developed a very low view of women. Mohammed was no exception. Again, we will quote Mohammed in the Hadith and Koran, then we will contrast and answer him from the Bible prophets, with the emphasize on the personal lives of the prophets.

          Ayatollah Khomeini admonishes men–on the use of the Libido:

          A man can have sexual pleasure from a child as young as a baby. However, he should not penetrate; sodomising the child is OK. If the man penetrates and damages the child then he should be responsible for her subsistence all her life. This girl, however, does not count as one of his four permanent wives. The man will not be eligible to marry the girl’s sister.

          Ayatollah Khomeini

          It is better for a girl to marry in such a time when she would begin menstruation at her husband’s house rather than her father’s home. Any father marrying his daughter so young will have a permanent place in heaven.

          Ayatollah Khomeini

          A man can have sex with animals such as sheep cows, camels and so on. However, he should kill the animal after he has his orgasm. He should not sell the meat to the people in his own village; however, selling the meat to the next door village should be fine.

          Ayatollah Khomeini

          (Quotes above are from Khomeini’s book, Tahrirolvasyleh, vol. 4, Darol Elm, Gom, Iran, 1990, Source: Homa)

          If one commits the act of sodomy with a cow, an ewe, or a camel, their urine and their excrement become impure, and even their milk may no longer be consumed. The animal must then be killed and as quickly as possible and burned. Ayatollah Khomeini
          (From The Little Green Book: Sayings of Ayatollah Khomeini, Political, Phylosophica, Social and Religious, with a special introduction by Clive Irving, ISBN number 0-553-14032-9, page 47 Source: Homa)

          Eleven things are impure: urine, excrement, sperm…non-Moslem men and women…and the sweat of an excrement-eating camel.
          Ayatollah Khomeini

          (From The Little Green Book, Source: Harwood’s Mythology’s Last Gods, 175)

          Al-Hadis, Vol. 3, p. 137, Abu Sayeed al-Khodri reported that Mohammed was talking to a group of women when he said, “… I see the majority of you will go to Hell.” The women asked why, to which Mohammed responded, “You often curse and are ungrateful to your companions.” He then told them they had a basic defect in their religion, to which they responded, “How?” Mohammed answered, “Is not the attestation (knowledge and witness) of a women only worth half of a man’s? And that is on account of her short intelligence.” Attested by agreement

          It is clear that Mohammed thought of all women as half-wits. This is no doubt why he forbid a man to walk between two women in Al Hadis, Vol. 1, p. 586 (64). The two women would become the equal of the man. That would be terrible to Mohammed who saw women, mentally, as children. Perhaps that is why he often favored his nine year old wife, Ayesha, and avoided his older wives.

          Page 190

          Al Hadis, Vol. 2, p. 692, Ibn Ma`sud reported from the Messenger of Allah who said, “A woman is like a private part (sex organ).When she goes out (walking) the devil casts a glance at her (in lust). Attested by Tirmizi.

          To Mohammed, a woman was a walking vagina, which tells us more about his own mind than about women.

          It is also clear that, to Mohammed, women were for one main use, copulation. This is why he required women to be completely covered from head to toe– otherwise he had no control over his lusts. It is only reasonable that a walking vagina should be totally covered, right? This is what Al Koran, Sura 4:34 is talking about when it demands women obey their husbands and “guard what Allah has guarded” when their husbands are away. Nowhere, in Islam, in Al Koran or Al Hadith, is a Muslim man told to guard his private parts for his wife’s sake! Read that again please. He can use his private parts anywhere he wants, even in sodomy with boys, without much rebuke from Allah.

          Some writers claim that Mohammed gave no hope to Muslim women in Paradise. Not so, and here is their hope,

          Al Hadis, Vol. 1, p. 211 (60), Omme Salmah reported that the messenger of Allah said, “Any female (wife or concubine) who dies while her husband was pleased with her will enter Paradise.” Attested by Tirmizi.

          This is clarified in the very next

          Al Hadis, Vol. 1, p. 211 (61), Tal qe-b-Ali reported that the Messenger of Allah said, “When a man calls his wife to satisfy his desire, let her come to him though she is occupied at the oven.” Attested by Tirmizi.

          So a wife can be certain of heaven if she is in the act of servicing her husband when he dies. Does this not explain why Mohammed’s wives fought over him every night? Copulation is a sure ticket to Paradise. David Moses or the Children of God cult also taught this, as did Joseph Smith of Mormonism.

          Mohammed expanded this:

          Al Hadis, Vol 1, p. 220, Anas reported that the Messenger of Allah said, “When a woman says her five prayers, fasts her month, obeys her husband, and guards her private parts, let her enter Paradise by whichever door she likes.” Attested by Abu Naveem.

          Mohammed gives one Gospel or Injil for women other than that they provide a pure and eager vagina to your husband. What lofty spirituality! Indeed, lofted upon the Islamic phallus! Let us hear no more of this rubbish from the Mullahs about how well Islam treats its women.

          You don’t deserve my discussion with you as long as you still resort to insults and don’t answer my questions.
          You really got no ethics and out of good manners, I’m ending this discussion now.

Federico Marini says:



Share ›

Il paradosso é che i cittadini ebrei dello Stato Ebraico,evito di parlare di Israeliani, perché ci sono quelli obbligatoriamente israeliani e quelli che pur essendo ad esempio italiani, o sedicenti italiani, mentono spudoratamente perché la loro vera patria é Israele, pur dicendosi, abusando, occidentali, ignorano tutto dell’Occidente vero, ch’è l’Europa ed anche dell’ Oriente, pur essendo fondamentalmente degli orientali.

E’ per questa ignoranza che non si capisce la dicotomia tra la politica ad esempio dei paesi arabi sunniti, come l’Arabia Saudita, che li spinge sebbene di mala voglia a dare una mano agli Usa ed indirettamente ad Israele. mano che poi lavano per la vergogna. in senso antiiraniano e la “emozione”, che li sollecita nel contempo ad aiutare i loro fratelli arabi, che lottano per la libertà,nonostante il maggiore alleato di questi sia proprio il “nemico tradizionale” l’Iran.

Aggiungo che ora gli stessi popoli sunniti cominciano a rumoreggiare contro i loro governi, il Qatar è disposto a fare ponti d’oro ai cittadini di Gaza e l’ha dimostrato e la stessa monarchia Saudita comincia a riflettere sul suo futuro.

Lo stesso Scià di Persia, pur professandosi alleato degli Usa e forzatamente anche vostro, inviava una barca di denaro ai Palestinesi ,in lotta.

Per quanto riguarda il vecchio continente, il vero Occidente, molti governi si portano ancora dietro il retaggio della sconfitta della seconda guerra mondiale, la cosiddetta colpa dell’olocausto e recitano la loro contiguità al semitismo ebraico,anche quando commette crimini davanti alle telecamere, non escludendo lo stesso Stato Pontificio, si sentono vili e colpevoli e cercano di lavare la loro cattiva coscienza di essere troppo sordi e troppo ciechi,con gli aiuti alle vostre vittime.

La Storia finora vi h concesso forse per mal gestita “pietas”, forse perché distratta, troppo tempo, ma ora comincia a dire basta. Siete troppo presuntuosi o stupidi per accorgervene? Io che leggo il Daily Forward ed il nuovo Tablet, Jerusalem post., Haaretz, sono sicuro che ve ne siete già accorti.


Federico Marini.

Plumbline says:

Ezekiel 35:11-12….

11 therefore, as I live,” says the Lord God, “I will do according to your anger and according to the envy which you showed in your hatred against them; and I will make Myself known among them when I judge you. 12 Then you shall know that I am the Lord. I have heard all your blasphemies which you have spoken against the mountains of Israel, saying, ‘They are desolate; they are given to us to consume.’……..


his majesty

Assalam-o-alaikum varahmatullah
My name is Asim karim,
I am a student of MBBS

Honorable respectable,

With great heart strings and a real rectitude i humbly state that my father is a poor retired aged 67 years personality.And Suffering from diabetes hypertension and heart patient. He is getting Rs.16, 000 / – per month pension and can not afford me financially to continue my further study more for the next 4 years in MBBS Which cost’s Rs.5, 00,000 / – (Five lac) per year.I am indeed intensely needy and request you to kindly help me financially from any liberal / Charitable keeping man who Humanism personality who want to donate me give zakat Fitr please help me. After the succession in MBBS i Shall help the poor financially and will give the donation and every kind of help (Insha Allah) Ameen.

Shall I pray my whole life for this kind of obliging.

My address are as under
Asim Karim Med: Student, Room no, 511,
11 south diamond road, north Hebei university,
Zhangjiakou city, Hebei province, PR china.
Contact no :0086-15230395994,
Acc no. 0000200925,
Bank code: 0386 (NBP) National bank of pakistan,
Main branch of Peshawar.
Peshawar Cantt.

Home address: Asim Karim S / O Fazal Karim Azad Mir Garhi,
Near Arbab Flats Peshawar,
Kotla Mohsin Khan Peshawar.
Post code: 25000
Mob :0301-5910881, 0301-5910882


Honorable Sir

With due respect I am submitting few lines for your kind consideration. I have come to know through reliable sources and internet that you are devoting services for the well being of humanity.

Incidentally I am submitting that I have a large poor family. Therefore there is no financial support for me. Please help me financially. It will not be a great relief to a poor family but will also be a great act of charity on your honor part. I am waiting for your favorable reply.

I belong to a very poor family with all of the children under studying. All of my children are getting education some of them are in the college and one of them in the university.

Kindly help me as it can only change the life of one lady but also the life of one complete nation.

Yours faithfully
Farzana Yasmin C/o khurshid Alam

H.No: E-158A Satellite town Rawalpindi pakistan


Your comment may be no longer than 2,000 characters, approximately 400 words. HTML tags are not permitted, nor are more than two URLs per comment. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments.

Thank You!

Thank you for subscribing to the Tablet Magazine Daily Digest.
Please tell us about you.

Hamas’ Lifeblood: Money

Saudi charities fund terrorists and their families—including Hamas’ late military chief Ahmed Jabari

More on Tablet:

A Grandfather’s Hidden Love Letters From Nazi Germany Reveal a Buried Past

By Vox Tablet — Reporter Sarah Wildman’s grandfather escaped Vienna in 1938. Long after he died, she discovered the life—and lover—he left behind.