Your email is not valid
Recipient's email is not valid
Submit Close

Your email has been sent.

Click here to send another

Arab Upheaval Reaches Israel

The rise of the Muslim Brotherhood and the civil war in Syria are bringing violence to Israel’s borders

Print Email
Left: An Israeli Merkava tank in the Golan Heights on Nov. 6, 2012. Right: An Israeli woman and children hide in a large concrete pipe during a Palestinian rocket attack on the Israeli town of Netivot on Nov. 12, 2012. (Menahem Kahana/AFP/Getty Images)

This week, Israel found itself targeted yet again: Missile and rocket attacks from Hamas-controlled Gaza terrorized Israelis living in towns and cities in the Negev, while on the northern border, the IDF fired a warning missile at Syria after apparently misdirected Syrian mortar fire hit the Golan Heights. The situations in Gaza and Syria are quite different, but the details of the two combined add up to picture of Israel’s dramatically changed strategic situation as a result of the upheavals in the Arab world and the advance of Sunni Islamism. These developments are heating up formerly quiet borders—and adding new, worrying dimensions to long-standing conflicts.

Though civil war has raged in Syria for 20 months, Sunday marked the first time that the conflict spilled over into Israel—and the first direct engagement of Syrian ground forces by the IDF from the Golan Heights since the Yom Kippur War of 1973. Since that year, the border has been one of Israel’s quietest. But this week, in response to mortar shells that hit the religious farming community of Alonei Bashan, Israeli gunners fired a Tammuz missile at Syrian government forces near Bir al-Ajami on the Syrian side of the Golan Heights. Then, following an additional Syrian mortar shell on Israeli soil on Monday, Israeli tanks targeted the mobile battery that had fired the mortar, injuring two Syrian soldiers.

In the south, this year has seen the highest volume of rocket attacks targeting Israeli communities since Operation Cast Lead in the winter of 2008-2009. Since January 2012, 858 rockets and mortar shells have hit Israel, compared to 676 in 2011, 357 in 2010, and 317 following Cast Lead in 2009. The deterrence gained by the IDF as a result of the operation appears to be diminishing with time, and the presence of a Muslim Brotherhood regime in Egypt is probably also contributing to Hamas’ increased boldness in Gaza.

At first blush, neither case represents a moment of supreme crisis. Israeli authorities are convinced that the stray bullets and mortar shells coming from Syria across the Golan are the result of the intensifying combat within that country rather than any attempt by the Syrian regime to draw Israel into the war. Strategic Affairs Minister Moshe Ya’alon told Israeli Army Radio Monday, “In my estimation, there is almost no doubt that (Assad) has no interest in opening a front. … All he needs now would be for us to hit him.”

Israel has now made clear to Assad that further incidents of this type will result in an Israeli response. As Ya’alon put it: “There were five incidents of supposed errant fire from small arms or mortars. We sent verbal messages. This didn’t help. So, yesterday, for the first time, we sent a physical message. If the message was understood, good. If the message was not understood, we will need to send other messages of the kind.”

In the South, Defense Minister Ehud Barak made clear on Tuesday that the current round of violence is not yet over. “Hamas and the other terrorist organizations are suffering as a result of intense strikes by the IDF in Gaza,” Barak said. “But it is certainly not over, and we will decide how and when to act if necessary.”

At this stage, any harsher Israeli response is likely to be carefully calibrated. Israel has a range of options that fall short of a paradigm-shifting major ground operation into the Strip. Airstrikes targeting Hamas facilities in response to missile attacks, which have gone on since Cast Lead, will continue. Targeting Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and other Islamist military figures may re-commence. A limited ground offensive is also an option, but it appears less likely. A major operation to unseat Hamas rule in Gaza, or even an operation at the scale of Cast Lead, remains extremely unlikely under present circumstances.

In Gaza, Sinai, and Syria, the increasing chaos is the result of a single, regional process: namely, the replacement of rotting secular Arab regimes by an energized Sunni Islamism.

In Syria, despite superior weaponry and continued support from Iran, Russia, and Hezbollah, Assad is losing ground. The strongman has money, weaponry, and international support—everything he needs for survival except for one crucial factor: people. The dictator has a steadily depleting number of men willing to risk their lives on his behalf.

This absence of reliable manpower has caused Assad to cede much of the north of Syria, and the rebels are increasing the tempo of fighting in the area south of Damascus. As the intensity of the combat in Syria’s south increases, so increases the possibility of stray shells finding their way over the border into Israel (as has happened with Turkey to Syria’s north).

The rebels remain a disparate, disunited bunch. But the Syrian insurgency is overwhelmingly Sunni, mainly rural, and devout. The growing force within it, supported by Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey, is Sunni Islamism. The statements from Free Syrian Army commanders condemning Israel’s warning shots and claiming, absurdly, that Israel had engaged on behalf of the regime have reminded Israeli policymakers that Israel has no friends on either side of the Syrian civil war. And whatever the outcome of the Syrian civil war, this new volatility is unlikely to subside for a long period to come.

To Israel’s south, the situation is defined by the advance of the Muslim Brotherhood—in Egypt, and in Gaza, in the guise of the group’s Palestinian franchise, Hamas. The presence of a Muslim Brotherhood regime in Egypt makes the notion of a major Israeli incursion into Gaza more problematic and fraught with potential dangers. Plus, at least for now, Israel considers it to be a strategic interest to prop up the shaky foundations of the peace treaty with Egypt.

All this means that the current round of violence in Gaza is likely eventually to subside back into another round of temporary, ambiguous, and relative quiet.

It’s hard to see anything optimistic in the current situation. And yet, from Israel’s point of view, one positive side effect of the rise of Sunni Islamism is the relative weakening of the Shia power of Iran. Hamas, once a client of Iran, has deserted its former patron, seeking an alliance with Sunni Egypt. The Syrian rebels, too, despise Iran, which is the main backer of the Assad regime. The key question is whether Sunni Islamist power, once it crystallizes, will prove an equally formidable challenge to Israel as is the Shia, Iran-led bloc, or whether the Sunni Islamists will prefer to focus on internal matters (and settling accounts with the Shia).

Either way, the events of the past few days on Israel’s borders have made it clear that the changing Arab political order is dictating the nature of events. The secular dictatorships that Israel vanquished on the field of battle a generation ago have departed or are departing the stage. Sunni Islamist forces are the inheritor. The result: renewed disorder and the challenging task facing the IDF of building renewed deterrence.


Like this article? Sign up for our Daily Digest to get Tablet Magazine’s new content in your inbox each morning.

Print Email

Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180

Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.

Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.

We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.

julis123 says:

Just once I’d like to see all those “experts” like Tom Friedman who chided Israel for not welcoming the Arab Spring with open arms, admit that they were completely wrong.

    ginzy1 says:

    Don’t you know that being a pooh-bah of punditry (especially at Valhalla (a.k.a., the NY Times)) means never having to say you are sorry, let alone, wrong?


    J’lem / Efrat

    Beatrix17 says:

    Now Friedman is saying
    that Israel will be on its own because Obama won’t have anything to
    do with her (yah, yah, yah, yah, yah). I’m not sure what Israel did
    wrong except to elect a conservative leader when America chose

    Netanyahu tried to stay
    out of the election, but of course he preferred Romney. So did I.
    Obama’s great talent is running for office—we can’t expect him to
    be a good leader, too. That’s like expecting someone to be a good
    dancer just because he has a great singing voice.

PhillipNagle says:

Syria has been a relatively peaceful enemy for the last few years. If Assad wins, he will use his army to maintain power and crush the Sunni rebellion. If the rebels win, Israel will be facing a radical Islamic state on its northern border. I’m rooting for Assad.

Poupic says:

All anyone can say is this: Thank you Obama for throwing Mubarak under the bus! He held the Muslim Brotherhood back. Apparently for anti- Semite Obama this was a crime. Now the whole Middleast is in turmoil, Islamists on the rise everywhere.

    Arup_2 says:

    what nonsense… what should Obama have done? Send in the marines to support another unpopular regime….

    Let us have a separate fund for neo-con agenda. I do not want my taxes to be spend on this.

      Poupic says:

      Good question! Nothing! Mubarak was a 30 years US ally that held the Islamists back. In the eyes of Obama this was a crime against democracy. Really? Turkey’s Erdogan has Journalists, generals who care about democracy in jail. Saudi Arabia, women can’t drive and can’t leave the home without being accompanied by a male relative and they can’t vote. Obama calls Turkey a friend and ally and he bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia. Then he made his speech to the Muslims in Cairo saying how much he misses the sound of the Muezzin call to prayer. Mubarak n jail started a cascade of Islamists growls all over the Middle East. Compare it when Obama first took office an now. By the way, is there more democracy in Egypt now? Veils are now de rigueur.

Nathan Benzimri says:

Israel’s LEGAL RIGHT to Judea and Samaria (West Bank):


Your comment may be no longer than 2,000 characters, approximately 400 words. HTML tags are not permitted, nor are more than two URLs per comment. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments.

Thank You!

Thank you for subscribing to the Tablet Magazine Daily Digest.
Please tell us about you.

Arab Upheaval Reaches Israel

The rise of the Muslim Brotherhood and the civil war in Syria are bringing violence to Israel’s borders

More on Tablet:

Rediscovering the First Woman Rabbi

By Laura Geller — Ordained in 1935, Regina Jonas died at Auschwitz. Now, she’s being honored.