Your email is not valid
Recipient's email is not valid
Submit Close

Your email has been sent.

Click here to send another


A haftorah of payment and purity

Print Email
Demonstrators gather at an American Family Association (AFA)-sponsored T.E.A. (Taxed Enough Already) Party to protest taxes and economic stimulus spending on the last day to file state and federal income tax returns, April 15, 2009 in Santa Monica, California. (David McNew/Getty Images)

If you’re interested in America’s political future, last week was a great time to read the writing on the wall.

Or, more accurately, the writing on the hand: addressing the Tea Party movement’s national conference, Sarah Palin—paragon of stately elegance, former vice-presidential candidate, present television commentator, future unknown—jotted down the key points of her speech on her palm. The media, of course, reveled in Palin’s faux pas, but somewhere amidst the swirling scorn, the actual message was lost.

Here is what the Deer Hunter from Wasilla had on her mind: moving from thumb to pinkie, Palin had scribbled “energy,” “tax,” and “lift American spirits.” Of the three items, it was, naturally, the second that most delighted Palin’s listeners. The Tea Party, after all, takes its name from a famed tax revolt, and the movement draws much of its energy from its members’ deep-seated dismay with the federal government’s power to levy taxes.

Where does Palin stand on the issue? Like most of her political stances, her opinions on this subject are a collage of inconsistencies, misrepresentations, and lies. She claimed, for example, that Ronald Reagan ended the recession in the 1980s by cutting taxes (a dubious claim at best, and one that ignores the small matter of her idol having raised the national debt an incredible $2 trillion in eight years), or that undoing Bush’s tax cuts would hit working class families (in fact, only families making $83,000 and more would be affected). But like everything else with Palin, it’s not so much what she says as how she says it.

In her book, Going Rogue, there are several references to taxation, none more telling than the one in which Palin introduces her readers to that other uneducated, inexperienced darling of rabid Republicans.

“Our campaign,” Palin writes, “quickly realized that Joe Wurzelbacher, a plumber by trade, typified the everyday American laborer who had worked hard to make his own way, was trying to improve his economic lot, and ought not to be punished by oppressive tax policies. Joe the Plumber reminded me personally of those Country Kitchen guys I’d sat with on Friday mornings in Wasilla when I was mayor. I liked him.”

If Palin’s putative presidential bid is successful, we can only assume that her policies would be designed to please Joe the Plumber and his fellow travelers in the Tea Party movement. Anyone wondering what such policies might yield need only look at California, where a successful 1978 taxpayers’ revolt known as Proposition 13 effectively curtailed the state government’s ability to govern the state. This, as Kurt Andersen writes in an insightful article in this week’s New York magazine, makes California “a big canary in this mine. Too much democracy and too little elite wisdom has crippled the state.”

The people who cheer on Palin, of course, are unlikely to heed such warnings when they appear in the media organs of the liberal, northeastern snobs. Perhaps, however, they might listen to the Bible.

If they took a few minutes to read this week’s haftorah, the Tea Partiers might find some jarring stuff. It’s all about taxation. The Temple, we’re told, had fallen into disrepair during the regime of an evil, incompetent, and power-hungry queen. The new administration, ashamed of the neglect gnawing at the nation’s most sacred place, announces plans to renovate, but the priests have become too corrupt: they’d rather filibuster the king than get down to fixing what’s broken. The work is then entrusted to the workmen themselves, who approach it with honesty and diligence and joy.

All that, of course, is in the very distant past. Had the same workers been around today, we can imagine, they would most likely denounce King Jehoash as a socialist and rush off to appear on Glenn Beck’s show.

If we truly want to lift American spirits, then, we need to reread II Kings, chapters 12 and 13, and remind ourselves that it’s not about taxation or representation but about responsibility, the kind of strong personal commitment that drives people not to for-profit festivals of malice and merchandise but to work for the common good.

The righteous men living in the time of Jehoash understood that restoring the Temple was a sacred task that addressed the spiritual and communal wellbeing of the entire nation. Likewise, the righteous men and women living in the time of Palin understand that affordable healthcare, social security, and similar programs designed to safeguard our health, our welfare, and our dignity are sacred tasks as well. If history is any measure, those who strive to repair the situation will triumph over those who listen instead to the din of demagogues. If they don’t, we would at least be able to say that we’ve seen the writing on the hand.

Print Email

Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180

Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.

Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.

We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.

It is of course very likely that Palin will not run for higher office. She seems to enjoy making bundles of money and is doing well at it at present.
There will be many who will urge her to run, but all polls so far indicate that even among many conservatives she is not regarded as right for the presidency.

Ben Pincus says:

Leibovitz claims the following as one of Palin’s ‘lies’–“…or that undoing Bush’s tax cuts would hit working class families (in fact, only families making $83,000 and more would be affected).” I don’t know who he is or who Tablet’s editors think they are addressing, but here in Ramapo, NY, the largest suburban, Orthodox Jewish communit in the world, in the county with the highest percentage of Jews in the US (over 33%), we have large families and high taxes. Typical property taxes on a single family home are $7K and yeshiva tuition for a family with 6 kids–our average–can easily run $25-30K annually. At $4K plus to run a car (we work in the city and don’t always have good public transit available) that doesn’t leave much for mortgage, food and living. Yes, it’s true that $83K puts us in the top 5% of US family incomes, but it’s also true that any Orthodox Jewish family in our town that only makes that amount is borrowing heavily just to live. So, at least to this group of Tablet’s Jewish middle-class readers, Obama’s State of the Union (dare I say it) white-lie of no new taxes—but not mentioning letting the Bush tax cuts expire–are anathema, while Palin start’s to look better. We are the Jews who vote Republican consistently, and maybe Palin won’t be the best candidate, but we remember voting ABC (Anybody but Carter) in 1980 and will almost certainly be voting ABO in 2012. If Palin is the candidate—and I would vastly prefer Mitt Romney—she will have my vote.

Milton Esbitt says:

Re: Ben Pincus. You comment on Real estate taxes. Theses are local taxes. If you itemize they help to reduce your federal taxes. Assuming six children, you have eight deductions. Do you in fact pay more that 10% of your gross income in federal taxes?

Cheptzi says:

Please don’t compare restoring the Temple to healthcare, social security and public programs.

Itˇ¦s in reality a great and useful piece of info. Iˇ¦m happy that you simply shared this useful information with us. Please keep us informed like this. Thanks for sharing.


Your comment may be no longer than 2,000 characters, approximately 400 words. HTML tags are not permitted, nor are more than two URLs per comment. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments.

Thank You!

Thank you for subscribing to the Tablet Magazine Daily Digest.
Please tell us about you.


A haftorah of payment and purity

More on Tablet:

Why the Teenage Girls of Europe Are Joining ISIS

By Lee Smith — Because they want the same things that teenage boys want: a strong sense of meaning and purpose