Your email is not valid
Recipient's email is not valid
Submit Close

Your email has been sent.

Click here to send another

What’s the Point of Passover?

Do today’s Seders exist to remember the past, or did past events occur so that they could be remembered later?

Print Email
(Spencer Platt/Getty Images)
Related Content

Dayenu? Enough Already.

If there were such a thing as a perfect Jewish joke, it might just be ‘Dayenu,’ the Passover punch line that is never enough

Platonic Form

What makes the seder night different? Its Greek roots.

Jews gather at Passover Seders to recall their foundational story with gratitude and awe: God extracted an oppressed people from under the yoke of their oppressors, making of them a vibrant nation. The Seder of today acts out the drama of the past in order to keep the memory fresh. But at the same time, the tradition hints at a powerful alternate understanding of the Seder: God took the Israelites out of Egypt so that they would tell the story later. In other words, the events of the past took place so that they could be recounted in the future.

As the Passover Haggadah weaves its way through biblical and rabbinic texts, one verse from the Bible is quoted four times: Exodus 13:8. The verse instructs parents to teach their children about Passover. It is the kind of verse that the ancient rabbis adored; it can be read in two ways, one a straightforward reading that makes sense in context and the other an ultra-literal reading that reveals another perspective. The “sensible” contextual reading agrees with most translations of the Bible, as well as many English-language Haggadahs: “You shall tell your child on that day, ‘[I do it] on account of what the Lord did for me when I went out from Egypt.’ ”

Though it may very well capture the original intent of the passage, that translation is not really true to the slightly awkward grammar of the Hebrew. Literally, the verse says this: “You shall tell your child on that day, ‘On account of this, the Lord acted for me when I went out from Egypt.’ ”

Rashi reads it the second way. He asks, “On account of what?” What “this” is referred to here? For what purpose did God take the Israelites out from Egypt? Rashi concludes that the word “this” refers to commandments such as eating matzo and bitter herbs, which we now observe at the Passover Seder. He might gloss the verse like this: It was on account of future Seders that God acted in the past on behalf of the Israelites, liberating them from Egyptian bondage.

In two of the four places that the Haggadah quotes this verse—both of them in the passage about the four sons—it clearly means for Exodus 13:8 to be read in the first way. The wicked child and the simple child need to be told why the grown-ups are making such a big deal of the Seder. The answer, with a different emphasis for each child, is that “I do this (now) on account of what God did for me (in the past).”

In the other two places, the Haggadah makes more sense if you read the verse Rashi’s way. First, just after the passage about the four sons, the Haggadah expands the phrase “on account of this” into “on account of matzo and bitter herbs,” that is, on account of the Seder. Then, in the section after “Dayenu” when we are explaining the meaning of the Seder symbols, Exodus 13:8 is brought in to support the idea that “in every generation a person is obligated see himself as though he personally had come out of Egypt.” In other words, “the Lord acted for me” in Egypt—that is, so that I, thousands of years later, would tell the story and experience the moment of stepping from slavery into freedom.

In some contexts the Haggadah sensibly assumes that the Seder commemorates the Exodus. In other contexts it hints at the opposite: The purpose of the Exodus was that the Israelites would later perform the Passover rituals—that they would one day become tellers of the Passover story.


In the Bible, the prototype Seder is organized around creating memories. It happens while the Israelites are still slaves. The ninth plague has ended, darkness has lifted over Egypt, Pharaoh has been warned about the killing of the firstborn, and everybody is in waiting mode. God tells Moses to instruct the Israelites to make a special meal, giving them 10 days to plan and four more to prepare:

Speak to the whole community of Israel and say that on the 10th of this month each of them shall take a lamb to a family, a lamb to a household. But if the household is too small for a lamb, let him share one with a neighbor who dwells nearby, in proportion to the number of persons: You shall contribute for the lamb according to what each household will eat. Your lamb shall be without blemish, a yearling male. You may take it from the sheep or from the goats. You shall keep watch over it until the fourteenth day of this month. Then the entire assembly of the congregation of Israel shall slaughter it at twilight. (Exodus 12:3-6)

A great deal of discussion will be required to organize the whole neighborhood into lamb-sized pods, taking into account appetites and preferences. Then the selected lambs must be guarded so they don’t sustain any injuries that might make them unkosher. So far, it sounds like the weeks before Thanksgiving: Invitations are flying, matches are being made for the lonely, and turkeys are being ordered. Then, a few days before the holiday, all the turkeys come out of the freezer to defrost at just the right speed—they mustn’t spoil, but they have to be ready for Thursday morning.

But there the similarity ends: On Thanksgiving, everybody will dress in their finery and sit down for a leisurely meal. At the first Seder, the instructions specifically call for a meal on the run:

They shall eat the flesh that same night; they shall eat it roasted over the fire, with unleavened bread and with bitter herbs. Do not eat any of it raw, or cooked in any way with water, but roasted— head, legs, and entrails—over the fire. (Exodus 12:8-9)

This is a recipe for street food: Take some flat bread—maybe a laffa—and smear it with spicy sauce. Grab some meat off the grill and wrap the whole thing up. This is a meal that can be eaten with one hand. There are to be no leftovers, no Tupperware containers to distribute, and the dress code is very specific:

You shall not leave any of it over until morning. If any of it is left until morning, you shall burn it. This is how you shall eat it: your loins girded, your sandals on your feet, and your staff in your hand. And you shall eat it in haste. It is a Passover offering to the Lord. (Exodus 12:10-11)

In biblical language, girded loins, sandals, and staff in hand signify traveling clothes. After 15 days of careful preparation, everything about this meal makes it sound like wolfing down a sandwich while waiting for the bus. It is this ritually hurried meal that will be the model for the long, slow Seders of the future.

The Israelites at the first Seder are in a state of instability. They stand on the threshold between slavery and freedom, with one thin doorway separating them from the death swirling around outside. They are commanded to intensify their unstable condition by acting it out with a ritual meal. Leaving Egypt, all the members of the community will have the same taste in their mouths, a powerful taste that will forever recall this moment. This will be the taste of the departure from Egypt.

In this story, the idea of remembering comes before the thing remembered. Before they slaughter and cook their lamb, before they eat the meal, before they escape from slavery, the Israelites are told three times that they are supposed to be creating memories. Exodus 13:8 is one example. Here is another:

When you enter the land that the Lord will give you as he has said, you shall observe this ritual. When your children say to you, “What is this service to you?” you shall say, “It is the Passover sacrifice to the Lord because he passed over the houses of the Israelites in Egypt when he smote the Egyptians, but saved our houses. (Exodus 12:25-27)

At the first taste of their traveling meal, the Israelites already know that year after year they are to put that same taste in their mouths, awakening the visceral memory of being about to leave Egypt, about to be free. They are to pass that taste down, along with the story, so that the memory is as real for the children as for the parents. Every generation will taste what it means to be poised on the brink of freedom.


The Haggadah is the product of the mishnaic period, after the fall of the Temple, when the rabbis were working out how to be Jewish without the sacrificial rites. Thus, it leaves out the main course of the original Seder meal: the paschal lamb. Instead, the Haggadah evokes the road from slavery to freedom with expansive words and with the evocative flavors of symbolic foods. Near the beginning of the telling it says:

Now we are slaves, next year may we be free.

A few lines later, it says:

We were slaves to Pharaoh in Egypt, but the Lord our God took us out from there with a mighty hand and an outstretched arm.

Which is it? Are we slaves on our way to freedom, or are we free people who were once slaves? At the Seder we taste both slavery and freedom. Through what goes into our mouths and what comes out of our mouths, we learn and re-learn every year that we are travelers out of Egypt. We are neither enslaved nor free. We occupy a world that is poised between slavery and redemption, and our challenge is to live a life infused with both realities.

The tool we have to meet this challenge is the story. It changes us by bringing a collective past into living memory, teaching us gratitude for redemption. From another angle, the value of the past is that it gets the story started. It is only by living inside this story that we can become people on the road to redemption.


Like this article? Sign up for our Daily Digest to get Tablet Magazine’s new content in your inbox each morning.

Print Email

Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180

Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.

Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.

We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.

George Klein says:

The story about leaving the slavery in Egypt is interesting, but there is absolutely no historical evidence about any of the Israelite tribes being slaves in Egypt. Israelites had traveled to Egypt for the purpose of commerce, but they never became slaves, real history has no proof of it. And that’s what counts for me to believe in.

    You say Israelites had traveled to Egypt for commerce, but there is no evidence that they were slaves…. what evidence is there they traveled for commerce? I would think your source for that is the bible…

Michael says:

The “guy” who wrote the sentence didn’t really think so deeply, couldn’t think as deeply as what was made out of it. The interpretations you are writing about came later and reflected the various situations that existed at the various times when the story was told.

This is religion at its best to distort reality, to mess things up. There never was any exile from Egypt, this what you should tell at the dinner table. The interpretations were made by religious personnel to support fantasies sold to people who listened (probably, were forced to listen) and this tradition continues through those who remain confused as to what is real in this world.

    So what is your source for the ‘true’ history of the jews??

      Michael says:

      Archaeological findings, writings by academicians and historians in a professional setting at western institutions, interpretations (by non-Jews preferably) of current events, United Nations reports, major news networks. No single source revelations and analyses are trustworthy, no matter how popular and widely held by the public. Jewish history is especially complicated because there is no clear agreement as to who is a Jew. Change the definition a little and you are starting a new ‘true’ history of the “jews.”

        First of all I think you’ll find many of the strongest advocates of a non traditional interpretation of jewish history are in fact jewish. I’m surprised you would make that comment.

        Secondly I can point to many archaeological findings that confirm what is in the bible. While it may be said that certain events have no archaeological evidence, do you have archaeological evidence which conclusively contradicts what is in the bible? You write “the interpretations you are writing came later” Do you have any evidence for that? I imagine you are a proponent of the documentary hypothesis… do you have any evidence of the Torah existing as separate documents composed over time by different authors? I doubt it, these theories are speculation by people with a modest understanding of jewish history, little understanding of Torah, and generally speaking, a personal and professional gain to advocate these ideas.

        United Nations reports?? I would LOVE to see what you are talking about…

        As for your remarks regarding who is a jew… give me a break. It is no wonder you deny the Bible. You deny modern jewish history. Jewish communities who are descended from Israelites have lived around the world for the past couple thousand years. Sure there may be intermingling amongst communities, but the practices are uniform for the most part throughout.

          Michael says:

          Very briefly because you and I are on different wavelengths completely. 1. No archaeological evidence has been uncovered proving that Jews were in Egypt in ancient times, that Moses existed, that there was an exile of Jews from Egypt. The entire Pesah story is mythological.
          2. The torah and history have very little in common. Torah started as a collection of legends, imagined stories with very little reality in it.
          3. Jewish religion is little bit relevant to defining who is a Jew. It is all in Jewish culture which does have some historical links to Jewish religion and torah. The link is through efforts of religion to subjugate the uneducated Jewish common man.
          4. And so on, and so forth.

          Yeah I guess we are

          1) As I said, some events from the bible have archaeological evidence and some don’t. However lack of evidence does not prove lack of existence. Not every event that ever happaned has archaeological evidence. Some things in the bible may be myth, but lacking evidence does not prove it’s a myth.

          2) you saying it again doesn’t make it more true. I asked you in my last comment for evidence of your theories.

          3) oh a little bit relevant? True jewish culture does sometimes stray from torah, and many jewish people do not follow torah. Torah has been the center of jewish life for as far back as anyone knows. And no form of judaism without torah has lasted for more than a couple generations.

          Since the times of the greco persian wars jews have been known as the followers of the torah. That is basically the beginning of recorded history. And preceding that point there is no evidence that jewish life was centered around anything except torah. So while you may not believe what is written in the torah is true, you certainly do not have any proof it is not.

Michael Tupek says:

Regarding the historicity of the Exodus, and the rabbinic treatment of scripture, I offer this excerpt from my book, “Torah of Sin and Grace”:

An important corollary to this observation is the evidential historicity

of the Torah document. The sheer facts that the Pentateuchal narrative

entails include not only the unheard of account of a purely theocentric

origin for the establishment of the Israelites as a covenanted society

with absolutely no credit to the Hebrews themselves, but also the sad

and shameful conclusion of that very people’s failure to be a respectable

covenant-keeping nation!

Can it be seriously contemplated, according to modern criticism,

that this people group would fabricate the glorious tale of their God, who

lovingly rescued them from slavery and oppression because of covenantal

promise to their patriarchs and gave them the highest ethical standards,

including the condemnation of false testimony? Would they then continue

the tale with their inability to love their God in return, as demonstrated

in appalling rebellions and covenant-breaking, as the final conclusion to

the most important document of their existence? And would this very

tale be faithfully maintained throughout this people’s collective memory,

copying it as their sacred scriptures, generation after generation, with the

damning recollections and rebukes through the noble office of Prophetism?

Then ultimately, would they close the developed canon of Hebrew

Scriptures with yet renewed and continued rebellions and covenant-breaking?

No! Only a people who had been really dealt with, as described

in the scriptures, and the honesty of the sanctified few prophets, can possibly

wish to maintain such a disappointing story of their origins.

To expand on the meaning of the statement, “It is because of this….”

There are 4 sons mentioned in the hagadah. The wise one asks what are the laws and the commandments? You explain to him the laws of Pesach. He is wise so he asks concerning the commandments. He does not need pointed out to him- it is because of ‘this’….

The wicked and shy you point out to them- it is because of ‘this’ i.e. the commandments, that Hashem redeemed us, and go on to explain the commandments relevant to that night- the Pesach sacrifice, matzah, and maror. I think that the ‘this’ refers to all the commandments, that Hashem redeemed to us to observe all the mitzvot, but the Pesach eve has specific commandments for that day so it is what is discussed.

The simple son you simply tell the story, you say with an outstretched hand God redeemed us from Egypt, but do not mention the commandments. I guess in this context we figure he is not going to connect the dots but is still part of the community.

cipher says:

“Can it be seriously contemplated, according to modern criticism, that this people group would fabricate the glorious tale of their God…

“No! Only a people who had been really dealt with, as described in the scriptures, and the honesty of the sanctified few prophets, can possibly wish to maintain such a disappointing story of their origins.”

Childish reasoning, typical of frum apologetics. You’ve no idea of how the human mind works.

cipher says:

“Since the times of the greco persian wars jews have been known as the followers of the torah. That is basically the beginning of recorded history.”

That would come as a surprise to the Sumerians and ancient Egyptians.

Moreover, there is plenty of archaeological evidence that contradicts the Torah and the Bible in general. One has only to do a little Googling – but of course, you won’t. Why should you read something that challenges your cozy, supremacist worldview?


Your comment may be no longer than 2,000 characters, approximately 400 words. HTML tags are not permitted, nor are more than two URLs per comment. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments.

Thank You!

Thank you for subscribing to the Tablet Magazine Daily Digest.
Please tell us about you.

What’s the Point of Passover?

Do today’s Seders exist to remember the past, or did past events occur so that they could be remembered later?