Your email is not valid
Recipient's email is not valid
Submit Close

Your email has been sent.

Click here to send another

The First Time I Shot a Gun

When I decided that my next book would include a gun, I went to a firing range for the first time—and loved it

Print Email
(Photoillustration Ivy Tashlik; original photo Shutterstock.)
Related Content

The Jewish View on Weapons

As we debate gun policy in the wake of Newtown, we should heed the wisdom of the Jewish sages

Gun Control and the Holocaust

Gun-rights advocates cite Nazi laws in their defense of the Second Amendment. Is the comparison fair?

Why Israel Has No Newtowns

It’s the Jewish state’s gun culture, not its laws, that prevents mass shootings like the one in Connecticut

I’m probably the last person anyone would imagine shopping for a handgun. When I was growing up in the 1960s, guns were about as alien in our household as a crucifix; in fact, they blurred together as symbols of the cruelty inflicted on Jews. Despite the successes of the Israeli army, guns were to me irremediably goyish, and I could never imagine even wanting to touch one, let alone fire it.

That didn’t change as an adult. I still stayed away from guns. Even the amateur sleuth at the center of my series of mystery novels has never used one.

Over the years, each new gun massacre making headlines confirmed my fear of firing. They followed the same pattern we’ve just seen with the Newtown shootings: horrific slaughter, calls for stricter gun laws, NRA craziness, and widespread panic that the government was somehow going to take everyone’s guns away—as if it could.

Despite my personal history and all the headlines, though, I recently walked into a gun shop, and I fired a gun at a firing range for the first time. It was a revelation. I plan on doing it again.


I grew up with Holocaust-survivor parents who didn’t want my brother and me to have toy guns, G.I. Joe dolls, or any military board games. Their abhorrence of anything connected to war was absolute, but they grudgingly let us watch Combat on television. When I was older, and facing the possibility of real combat in Vietnam, they were ready to send me to live with a Canadian cousin if I ended up being drafted. Luckily, that never happened.

The news event I remember best from my early childhood was the assassination of John F. Kennedy. When I think of junior high school, it’s the killings of Robert Kennedy and Martin Luther King that stand out as landmarks, the way 9/11 does for many young students in the class I’m currently teaching at Michigan State University. Each news-devouring mass murder in the country following those assassinations fed my abhorrence of guns, reflected in my parents’ own attitudes.

My father’s home was a small town in the mountainous Carpatho-Ukraine region of eastern Czechoslovakia, and he said anti-Semitism was so much a problem there that he always kept a knife in his boot. You might think he would have also had a rifle, given that his father had served in the Austro-Hungarian army during World War I. But the only gun I ever heard my father mention was one that was pointed at him that might have ended his life.

During the Holocaust, my father’s part of Czechoslovakia was seized by Hungary, and the Hungarian army grabbed 50,000 young Jewish men for forced labor. Over 40,000 of them died from malnutrition, exhaustion, frostbite, starvation, cold, war wounds, and cruel treatment by anti-Semitic officers. Out of the 150 young Jewish men sent into slave labor from his small town, fewer than two dozen returned.

My father and other men like him performed heavy labor on roads, building bunkers and digging trenches. Anyone who couldn’t keep up when the weather later turned unbearably hot was shot and left where he lay. The Hungarian officer in charge of their platoon, Imre, took a personal dislike to my father, beating him once so badly that he passed out. Another time, marching with 35 other men, my father was the target of Imre’s grenade, which killed two boys nearby; one had his belly ripped open, and the other’s head was pulverized. When the cart brought my father back to the barracks, he was covered in so much blood, everyone thought he was dead.

Imre’s next attack was indirect. When a German officer appeared and asked for someone who spoke German and Russian, my multilingual father volunteered. He was taken into town as a translator to help the German officer find out about the local partisan network, but he had no idea if any information he heard was valuable or not. Heading back to the labor barracks, they reached a stream, and when my father was halfway across, the German officer said, “Stop—turn around.” He had his machine pistol out. “You know, your officer told me I don’t have to bring you back.” He had his finger on the trigger. Then suddenly he asked my father what his first name was and was shocked by the response: Alexander. “Oh, my God; I don’t believe it,” said the German. “I cannot do this, that’s my name, too.” He gave my father his freedom and returned to his own outfit.

The pistol that almost killed my father came to represent all guns to me—a symbol of the goyim who, as yet another Alexander says in Portnoy’s Complaint, “own the world and know absolutely nothing of human boundaries and limits.” Recent massacres like the ones at Columbine and Virginia Tech and Newtown have only confirmed that dire assessment of non-Jews in my mind; so has the relentless pressure from the NRA to weaken gun-control legislation everywhere it can. There’s an almost religious fervor about guns in this country because they’re so deeply embedded in our founding cultural myth: the Minutemen at Lexington and Concord, and “the shot heard round the world.”


Even though seven of my 24 books are mysteries, guns don’t play a major role in them at all, and my protagonist, amateur sleuth Nick Hoffman, has never fired one. But as I planned the book I’m currently writing and laid out the ways in which Nick was to be threatened, the logic of his buying a gun for protection became irrefutable. He needed to use a gun. And if he needed to use one, I needed to use one first. I found a gun shop and a separate gun range close to where I live and called the “shooting center” to sign up for an introductory session.

Neither was what you might picture; the shop was more like a modest neighborhood jewelry store with the guns lovingly displayed in two small rooms. And the very new building 10 minutes’ drive away that houses the gun range is bright, clean, and airy, surrounded by fields. It almost has the feel of a health club or swimming facility. The desk is staffed by friendly college students, and my instructor couldn’t have been clearer and more relaxed as he showed me a 40-minute PowerPoint presentation on gun safety. I went there on a Sunday afternoon, and I was the only “student” in the small lecture room, glad to feel private, taking in everything about safety and the construction of a gun slowly, because I had to keep asking questions. The longer I sat there, the more I felt that the session wasn’t just background for the character in my novel; it was an entrance for me. I loved learning about the construction of a pistol, how it operated, how the components fit together. I hadn’t expected that at all.

Wearing goggles and noise-blocking headphones, I followed him through the two airlock doors into a gun range that looked like a smaller, less-elaborate version of the ones you always see in TV and movie thrillers. There were no separations between the small tables where people were sitting, but again I felt private because there was only one other person firing, and there were half a dozen vacant positions between us. The target wasn’t human-shaped as I’d expected, since the facility’s connected to the local university and the Board of Trustees has forbidden those. It was a sheet of 8 1/2 x 11-inch beige paper with a black circle in its center that was only 2 1/2 inches in diameter. Hanging 4.5 meters away, it looked tiny.

The instructor patiently took me through the Ruger .22 pistol, repeating what we’d discussed before, showing me how to load the clip five bullets at a time, put the magazine in, push down on the slide stop, position the gun in my right hand aiming at the target, curl my right pinky, ring finger, and middle finger around the grip, and secure those with four fingers of my left hand holding the right steady. I had to make sure my index finger was along the barrel and my thumbs parallel to each other and down below the slide, which would pop out when the gun was empty. Last move: clicking down the safety with my right thumb.

I kept waiting for something, anything to feel weird. Instead, I was fascinated, attentive. When I was ready, I took my first shots. There was no recoil with this caliber of gun that I could feel, but the spent cartridges popping out the right side were odd, something my instructor explained would happen but still felt mildly peculiar.

“Have you done this before?” he asked.

I answered, “Never.”

“That’s a very good group.”

He pressed the button to bring the target sheet up to where we sat, and the shots were all inside the black circle, within an inch of each other. I moved the target back half a meter, and half a meter again as the session continued, and wasn’t quite as accurate further away, but still had surprisingly good grouping. Breathing correctly during firing wasn’t difficult for me, but remembering the right order of loading the gun was, which made me grateful for his suggesting only five bullets at a time. Repetition of the steps helped my middle-aged brain absorb the new information and helped my hands learn new skills.

On the way out, another instructor asked me what I’d thought of my session.

“I loved it!”

I left with plenty of data for my book, but also with something totally unexpected: a revelation for myself. I enjoyed target practice. I enjoyed holding a gun. It didn’t seem remotely foreign or bizarre. It felt natural. And I never once thought of my father and the gun pointed at him decades ago.


Like this article? Sign up for our Daily Digest to get Tablet Magazine’s new content in your inbox each morning.

Print Email

Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180

Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.

Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.

We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.

phoebes says:

Interesting article, Lev. I was thinking about taking up target shooting out here in Santa Fe – I shot rifles in high school – but after Newtown, I’ve put it off. When will the next Nick Hoffman be published?

DickRoistacher says:

I have been a liberal Jewish shooter for 55 years and am a certified pistol instructor. I always ask my students how they felt the first time they held a loaded pistol. Not one has ever reported feeling increased aggression. The two most common responses were: 1. I don’t want to screw up, incur a safety violation, and get tossed off the range. 2. I want to do at least as well as my [boyfriendgirlfriend|spouse] in the next lane.

I mentioned the need to know what if felt/smelled/sounded like to fire a gun for my writing; he made an appointment at a gun shop/firing range. Turned out to be a 3 hour concealed weapon permit class (don’t ask about the alarmingly simple process for obtaining one in Florida). I could have left without ever firing a gun, but the instructor let me spend time with an instructor. Hubster was there as well…and we also started with a Ruger .22. I outshot him–I think women do better because we don’t have to prove our ‘manlliness’. After that, I fired a variety of weapons to have a better feel for my characters, but I’ve never had a desire to own one. (And, for the record, it’s a magazine, NOT a clip–something else I learned in the pursuit of literary accuracy.)

    For the record, Terry, the instructor called it a clip. I learned that people use them interchangeably, even gun folks, even if it’s technically incorrect.

    To be perfectly Talmudic about it, the only weapon I know of that loads from a clip is the M-1 rifle. You pull back the bolt, push a metal clip containing eight rounds into the top and let the bolt come forward, stripping off the top round and chambering it. When the last of the eight rounds has been fired, the clip is ejected and discarded (not likely, since they don’t make them any more). John Garand’s original design loaded from a box magazine inserted from the bottom, but some mysterious Army bureaucrat changed things. (See all the great stuff you can learn by reading Tablet!)

      Well, I never thought I’d be quoting the NRA, but here’s what their web site says about the question of clip vs. magazine:


      A device for holding a group of cartridges. Semantic wars have been
      fought over the word, with some insisting it is not a synonym for
      “detachable magazine.” For 80 years, however, it has been so used by
      manufacturers and the military. There is no argument that it can also
      mean a separate device for holding and transferring a group of
      cartridges to a fixed or detachable magazine or as a device inserted
      with cartridges into the mechanism of a firearm becoming, in effect,
      part of that mechanism.”

JeffreyME says:

I’m neutral on guns — I’ve never owned one, even though I have lived in “marginal” neighborhoods and backpacked deep into the wilderness on my own. But it seems to me that just because something feels “natural” or fun or provides an adrenalin rush does not translate into something good or positive. Lots of people feels great and have fun driving ATVs off road and tearing up entire ecosystems. Skydiving’s a blast, but you’d be surprised at the mortality rate for those who do it regularly.

I can see having a fun time taking target practice. But to treat such an event as an epiphany or revelation strikes me as being a bit full of one’s self. Perhaps your next piece should be on the life changing experience a Jew can have eating pork belly.

P.S. to Terry and Dick: I just interviewed a retired cop who is now a PI and owns three guns and he says he’s always called it a clip and so have all his cop buddies and friends who own guns, so perhaps the difference is partly regional. He said he would say “magazine” for a rifle, but never for a pistol.


Your comment may be no longer than 2,000 characters, approximately 400 words. HTML tags are not permitted, nor are more than two URLs per comment. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments.

Thank You!

Thank you for subscribing to the Tablet Magazine Daily Digest.
Please tell us about you.

The First Time I Shot a Gun

When I decided that my next book would include a gun, I went to a firing range for the first time—and loved it