Children’s storybooks drawn from tradition can get sanctimonious. Does a pop star do any better with the stories of the Baal Shem Tov?
One of the hazards of being a Jewish child, one that has existed at least since I was young and probably long before, is the dreary misery that is the Jewish storybook. Before I am inundated with hysterical email, let me assure you that I have read David Wisniewski’s Golem. But the great Jewish children’s books are few and far between.
At least once a year, my mother sends a clunker to my children, usually as a Hanukkah or Passover gift: Shmulik and the Kvetching Tallis; Mrs. Gabinsky’s Talking Kneidlach. Needless to say, my kids don’t enjoy these books. They try, especially my oldest, Sophie, whose defensive Jewish posture rivals that of her grandmother, a woman who made Joseph Trumpeldor seem like a member of Peace Now. But these self-conscious tales of shtetl life or Bible history are never read more than once through in our house. My kids seem instinctively to grasp that there is something reproachful about them, a kind of sanctimonious finger-wagging: “You should be a nice, well-behaved Jewish child,” they drone. “Now finish your food.”
In my own house, the clutter of such tomes has expandedand not merely because they are impossible to dispose of. (“Did you lose that book I gave you about the Japanese consul in Lithuania who saved Jews during the Holocaust? I’ll get you another copy.”) Madonna’s three books for children have been added to the pile. They have that familiar hectoring tone, although hers is cloaked in a kind of studied whimsy: her characters dance the “tickety boo” and are named Tittlebottom. My children do not react well to this kind of ham-fisted sermonizing. My kids demand a bit more magic in their stories, and the learning of lessons is not a big priority. Still, that’s what books like these are all about, so it only makes sense to evaluate them on those terms.
Madonna’s three booksMr. Peabody’s Apples, The English Roses, and the latest, Yakov and the Seven Thievesare based, she writes, on Baal Shem Tov stories told to her by her “Kabbalah” teacher.1 I can vaguely recall the story behind the Mr. Peabody book, as I’m sure anybody who wasn’t entirely comatose in Hebrew school can. You remember: Once you’ve spread evil gossip about someone, retracting your words is as difficult as gathering all the feathers from a pillow burst into the wind. The Yakov story I sort of remember too, although Madonna’s stated moral is unsatisfying and somehow ill-constructed. It’s about the prayers of evil men unlocking the gates of heaven, but it feels half-baked.
For the life of me, I can’t figure out the point of The English Roses. I honestly think that the instruction this story gives is to be nice to pretty girls because their lives might be harder than ours. Did the Baal Shem Tov really say this? I know I’m altogether too influenced in this as in all things by the horror that was George Washington Junior High School in Ridgewood, New Jersey, but it never seemed to me that those flaxen-haired lovelies had any problems making friends. On the contrary; they very contentedly made the lives of the rest of us a living hell.2
The books are gorgeous, more beautiful than the norm for Jewish storybooks. Your basic Purim tale comes in two versions: poorly-drawn bubble people in primary colors, and ornate paintings with a vaguely Mitteleuropean flavor, the colors so faded as to give the impression of having been dug up from the dirt beneath a ruined Latvian synagogue. Jeffrey Fulvimari, Loren Long, and Gennady Spirin have illustrated magnificently, far better than Madonna’s clunky prose deserves. It’s dispiriting that these talented artists don’t have their names on the covers of the books, as illustrators of children’s books usually do. I can only assume they were well-compensated for this small sacrifice.
Spirin’s paintings in particular are splendid.3 His illustrations for Yakov and the Seven Thieves are complex and multilayered; some pages look like illuminated manuscripts, others like Renaissance paintings, still others have a cartoonish appearance. What they aren’t is Jewish. Despite the fact that the story is supposed to take place in a “very small village” (a shtetl, I assume), the illustrations give us a beautifully rendered Tudor town. There isn’t a yarmulke or a set of payes to be seen, and the heroes are suspiciously blond. Don’t get me wrong, my two youngest kids are towheads, Jews come in all shapes and sizes, blah blah blah. But this particular literary genrestultifying sanctimonious shtetl taleusually requires at least a few grizzled beards and the odd hooked nose. And the women are not generally attired in hoop skirts.
I could be wrong in assuming that Yakov and the Seven Thieves is supposed to be Jewish, despite its Hasidic roots. Perhaps only some of usthose of us who have compelled entire classrooms of children to listen as we read them Herschel and the Hanukkah Goblins yet again, injecting enough “diversity” to justify another year’s worth of Christmas carols and gingerbread houseswould even think the book is Jewish at all. Oddly, The English Roses is more Jewish. The poor little pretty girl is named Binah, and she spends her time chopping onions, peeling potatoes, and scaling fish. She also calls her father Papa and wears a shmatte on her head.
I doubt, however, that The English Roses will be added to the list of approved reading material kept by the world’s Jewish grandmothers. Neither will Mr. Peabody’s Apples, although arguably it has the simplest and clearest of Jewish morals, and that feather pillow is a nice metaphor. I wouldn’t be surprised, however, if Yakov and the Seven Thieves becomes a staple of Hanukkah gift-giving. It’s a muddled and simplistic story (“when we turn away from our naughty behavior and embrace good deeds, as the thieves did with their prayers, we are turning the key and unlocking the gates of heaven”) but the illustrations are lovely and the title sounds like those of all the other boring Jewish storybooks. It might even be sold in synagogue bookstores and at Jewish book fairs every November. Bubbe will wrap it in navy blue paper stamped with silver stars of David, and little Hannah and Zachary will tear open their package with eager anticipation. They’ll read the book once, and toss it onto the shelf with all the others she’s given them over the years. In a little while, their mother will donate it to the library. At which point Bubbe will say, “Did you lose that Madonna book I gave you? Don’t worry, I bought you another copy. Happy Hanukkah.”
1I won’t pretend to know much about Kabbalah, either the Los Angeles version or the one that only married, male scholars of Torah and Talmud over the age of 40 are permitted to study. I don’t know from Gershom Scholem or from Rabbi Philip Berg, so I’ve got some nerve, really, being judgmental enough to slap those quotation marks around the word. But when the Kabbalah Centre website is flogging anti-stress candles and online Zohar classes it’s hard not to feel like Margaret Cho might have had a point when she referred to it as “Scientology with yoga.”
2I imagine that the moral Madonna wanted to get across was that you should be kind and generous because you can never know the circumstances of another’s life. Why she thought the story of a girl ostracized because of her beauty might accomplish this probably has something to do with the bizarre circumstances of being fabulously successful and famous, yet nonetheless in very close touch with one’s capacity for pain. It’s hard to be rich. Trust her, she knows.
Jonathan Rosen talks about Tolstoy, George Eliot, and why writers treat religious longing with the silence once reserved for sex.
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.