Your email is not valid
Recipient's email is not valid
Submit Close

Your email has been sent.

Click here to send another

No Prize

A new biography charts Joseph Pulitzer’s path from immigrant cub reporter to newspaper magnate and boss from hell

Print Email
(Photo collage by Tablet Magazine. Pulitzer photo: WikiCommons)

If you were an immigrant sailing into New York Harbor at the close of the 19th century, the first building to catch your eye would have been the headquarters of the New York World, the tallest structure in Manhattan. Twenty stories high, and topped by a gilded dome that reflected light 40 miles out to sea, the World building was—as James McGrath Morris writes in his new biography Pulitzer: A Life in Politics, Print, and Power—“a temple of America’s new mass media.”

The newspaper printed there was as dominant in the city’s life as the building was in its skyline. Starting in the 1880s, Joseph Pulitzer’s World revolutionized journalism with its signature blend of muckraking investigations, crusading editorials, sensational crime and human-interest stories, and colorful graphics. Selling hundreds of thousands of copies, the World was the kind of newspaper that didn’t just record history, but made it. In the 1884 presidential election, the paper’s support helped Grover Cleveland carry New York State, putting a Democrat in the White House for the first time since the Civil War. In 1898, the World—along with its great rival, William Randolph Hearst’s Journal—led the drumbeat that carried the country into the Spanish-American War.

For that hypothetical immigrant, the power and promise of America could have been summed up in the fact that the World was itself the creation of an immigrant—a Hungarian Jew who arrived in the United States without a penny and without knowing a word of English. Joseph Pulitzer was born in 1847 in the Hungarian town of Mako and spent his childhood in Budapest, where his father was a successful merchant. (The family name came from a town in Moravia, Pollitz, where they had lived generations earlier.) Like most of the Jewish middle class in the Habsburg Empire, the Pulitzers spoke German, and they eagerly embraced Judaism’s new Reform movement. “By the time Joseph reached his teenage years,” Morris writes, “being Jewish remained part of his life, but no longer the center of it.”

Pulitzer might well have remained in this assimilated Jewish milieu if it hadn’t been for the death of his father, when he was 11 years old. This was the most devastating of the many deaths that afflicted the family when Joseph was growing up—of nine children, only two survived to adulthood—and it reduced them to poverty. When Joseph reached the age of 17, in 1864, he decided to strike out on his own. Ordinarily he could not have afforded the passage to America, but thanks to the Civil War recruiters were scouring Europe for young men willing to serve as paid substitutes for Northern draftees. It was on a ship full of these soldiers-to-be that Pulitzer crossed the Atlantic; he ended up serving in the First New York “Lincoln” Cavalry, in one of several German-speaking units.

Because he did not enlist until nearly the end of the war, Pulitzer never saw combat, and he was discharged in June 1865. At loose ends, he decided to strike out for St. Louis, a fast-growing Midwestern city with a large German immigrant population. He soon landed a job as a reporter for a German-language newspaper, the Westliche Post, and became a protégé of the its owner, Carl Schurz, a Union general and future U.S. Senator.

Schurz, Morris shows, was a role model for Pulitzer, proof of how an immigrant (he had fled Germany after the revolutions of 1848) could leverage his community’s clout into a career in journalism and politics. What Morris does not dwell on is the irony that Pulitzer, a Jew, could so easily adopt the German-American community as his own. Back home in Central Europe, Pulitzer’s Jewishness—no matter how assimilated he might be—would have been his defining trait, marking him out permanently from his German and Hungarian neighbors. In America, however, the bonds of language meant more than the divisions of religion and ethnicity, and Pulitzer was accepted, with remarkably little friction, as a spokesman for St. Louis’s Germans.

In 1870, just six years after he arrived in the country, Pulitzer was elected to the Missouri state legislature. His district was populated by German Republicans and Irish Democrats, and he campaigned on straightforwardly ethnic grounds. The Irish, he wrote in a newspaper article, “would vote for the Devil himself in order to defeat the candidates of the Germans. What do our German friends have to say about that?” Later he was appointed to St. Louis’s police commission as holder of its traditionally German seat.

But as Morris shows, in a detailed excursion into post-Civil War political history, Pulitzer’s rise was stalled by the failure of the Liberal Republican movement, which Schurz led as a rebellion against President Ulysses S. Grant. When Pulitzer subsequently changed his party affiliation to Democrat, he was acting on principle—he believed the Republicans had become the party of corruption and the rich—but he was also positioning himself for the future. Just as he moved from the German press to the wider English-language press, so he left behind the Germans’ preferred party. When he bought his first newspaper, the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, in 1878, he declared it would be “independent with a Democratic leaning,” and for the rest of his life Pulitzer remained an important power-broker in the Democratic Party.

Morris traces the rising arc of Pulitzer’s career, as he turned the Post-Dispatch into a moneymaker and set his sights on the capital of business and journalism, New York City. At the same time, he was leaving his Jewish origins far behind. The woman he married in 1878, Kate Davis, was a distant relative of Jefferson Davis, and the wedding took place in the Episcopal Church of the Epiphany in Washington, D.C. “Success, power, and wealth in the United States had only one place of worship, the Episcopal church,” Morris writes, and for the rest of his life Pulitzer would belong to it. He even encouraged the rumor “that his mother had not been Jewish but rather was Catholic”—though it is doubtful that this would have seemed much of an improvement to America’s WASP elite.

Pulitzer’s Jewishness was an open secret, however, and his enemies were happy to make use of it. Morris quotes a few of their jibes—he was called “Jewseph Pulitzer,” and attention was drawn to his “nasal protuberance”—but on the whole, it is remarkable how mild and ineffective this kind of baiting was, especially compared to the kind of ideological anti-Semitism then being directed against Jewish press figures in Europe. What bothered people about Pulitzer was not that he was Jewish, but that he was so bad-tempered and hard to get along with. As early as 1870, while he was a state legislator, Pulitzer became notorious for shooting a man during a political dispute (the injury turned out to be minor). At the World, he continued to rack up a long list of influential enemies, taking on corrupt politicians or simply political opponents, including Theodore Roosevelt.

More damning, Morris shows, was Pulitzer’s treatment of his own staff and family. In the book’s last third, Morris draws a portrait of Pulitzer as a boss from hell—a micromanager who bombarded his employees with telegrams, even as he refused to set foot in the office. Editor after editor quit the World, often to swell the ranks of Hearst’s Journal, simply because they couldn’t tolerate Pulitzer’s rages and nitpicking. He and his wife eventually led separate lives, and his children were terrified of him. When Pulitzer lost his vision, because of detached retinas, in the late 1880s, he became abnormally sensitive to sound, and he spent millions of dollars buying and renovating houses in a hopeless quest for perfect silence. Eventually he preferred to spend time on his specially sound-proofed yacht, literally cut off from the rest of humanity.

By the time he died, in 1911, Pulitzer’s life had gone from American dream to nightmare. If Orson Welles had made Citizen Kane about Pulitzer instead of Hearst, it would have been just as devastating a parable. It might also have prevented Pulitzer from being so widely forgotten. The World went out of business in 1931, a casualty of the Depression, and the World building was demolished in 1955. (Spare a thought for it if you ever take the car on-ramp to the Brooklyn Bridge, which was built over its remains.) Today, Pulitzer’s name is remembered primarily because of the prizes he endowed, along with Columbia’s Journalism School, at the end of his life.

What makes Morris’s biography especially timely, however, is that we are now witnessing the death of the whole style of newspaper publishing Pulitzer invented. The big city daily, the kind of newspaper that everyone read because everyone had to read it—from politicians and businessmen to laborers and homemakers—is a thing of the past. So are the profits that such papers used to bring in. Pulitzer’s paper made him the 19th-century equivalent of a billionaire; today, dying papers look for billionaires to bail them out as a public service. A century after Pulitzer’s death, the newspaper now promises to join the other great technologies of the Gilded Age—from railroads to coal mining—on the scrap heap of American history.

Print Email

Very nicely written article. I liked the arc of this piece as it followed the arc of Pulitzer’s life. I caught this from Arts & Letters Daily and am very glad that they posted it.

In thinking about what makes America special, the story of Pulitzer’s acceptance and rise within the German American population is especially telling. That same group in Europe may have killed him; in America, they built his success.

This story of an immigrant’s life, including the tragic decline of his illustrious career, is the quintessential American story.

Taylor Blumenthal says:

Very interesting and informative article, Mr. Kirsch. This is the first time I’ve ever read that Joseph Pulitzer was Jewish. What’s not noted here is that while Pulitzer’s World faded, the family’s holdings in St. Louis remained well into the 21st century, when the widow–and second wife–of Joseph Pulitzer III (also known as Joseph Pulitzer Jr.), and his brother, Michael Pulitzer, sold the company for many millions of dollars to an Iowa-based newspaper chain. The wealth that Joseph Pulitzer Jr. (the real one) and his son accrued translated first into many gifts to the Saint Louis Museum of Art, and later to the Harvard University Art Museum. Joseph Pulitzer III (Jr.) also endowed a chair in modern art at Harvard. Emily Rauh Pulitzer, his widow, also founded the Pulitzer Foundation in St. Louis, which includes striking museum designed by Tadao Ando. As far as I can tell, nearly all of the family’s institutional gifts have been secular in nature, though Michael Pulitzer did bestow upon the highly St. Louis Abbey a 50th anniversary sculpture of the Virgin Mother, Mary. I am not aware of any gifts to Jewish organizations or institutions.

Peter Jordan says:

You mean that, in his insulated yacht, he was FIGURATIVELY cut off from the rest of the humanity.

Miguel Cavalcanti says:

Too bad about the isolation and paranoia of his later years. But Joseph’s Prizes have been mostly awarded to the very best journalists out there. The other stuff–fiction–is fashion.

Williamjames Hoffer says:

Umm. Coal mines and railroads are still around if you have not noticed. Will not the same be true for newspapers?

Stuart Kaplan says:

The newspaper chain Taylor Blumenthal refers to was owned by Scripps Howard which published the Evening Telegram. This became the World-Telegram which became a conservative paper and lasted form 1931 until 1950 when it acquired the New York Sun. That joined paper was the World-Telegram and The Sun which joined with Hearst’s Journal American and the Herald Tribune in 1966. The whole NewYork-World-Tribune enterprise finally closed in 1967.

It was a newspaper in NYC published by Pulitzer. 1890 World Almanac and Bureau of Information. I was surprised because growing up in the Midwest I always thought of Pulitzer as a St. Louis publisher. We still have at the bookshop what I think is a first publication (almanac) which was probably used as a reference for United States economics, etc., from the new building in NYC. There is a 7 page description of the new Pulitzer building in NYC.

The business brokerages network will give you access to a large pool of individuals who’ve the information about companies for sale and buyers or investors looking for a organization venture. By producing great use from the information you’ve, you may be cutting a provide and make a handsome profit out of the transactions.

James Palmer says:

I take issue with several points of Mr. Kirsch’s fundamentally negative read on Joseph Pulitzer in this review of McGrath’s superb biography.

First, from our post-Holocaust historical viewpoint, it’s difficult–and painful–to look back and view not only the close association of Jews and Germans in this country (and others), but also the veneration for Germany and German culture that East European Jews had in the 19th century (as late as 1917, Yiddish poets like Morris Rosenfeld were writing poems like “Hoch der Kajser,” exhorting the German army to pummel the Russians). Joseph Pulitzer was only one of many St. Louis Jews who identified, politically and culturally, with the Germans of that city. At the time, there was nothing ironic about it–Pulitzer’s association with them was natural and logical.

But my greatest issue with Mr. Kirsch’s review is that he views Pulitzer’s life as a tragedy–the title of the essay, “No Prize,” is telling. He overlooks the fact that Pulitzer was an extremely sick man for much of his life, but triumphantly overcame both his mental and physical ailments by the sheer force of his will alone and remained a vital part of the American scene until his death in 1911. He won a major victory for freedom of the press in the last decade of his life against no less a foe than Theodore Roosevelt, and, by the way, created the American mass media at the same time.

Pulitzer was profane, at times cruel and petty, and no charmer to be around, I’ll give you that. But to read his life as a tragedy and dismiss his influence because he wasn’t nice is to make a grave mistake. By creating newspapers that were accessible–and appealing–to a mass readership, Pulitzer created the mass media, regardless as to whether that media arrives with a rubber band around it on our doorstep, or in our email inboxes.

That said, I am a great admirer of Adam Kirsch–his biography of Disraeli is excellent and insightful. But I disagree with his take on this book.

Unhappy for the brobdingnagian retrospect, but I’m really tender the new Zune, and desire this, as advisable as the excellent reviews both opposite people individual handwritten, faculty serve you terminate if it’s the just prize for you.

Well written article very informative, is it possible, though, for you to go into more detail on this subject, I’d like to learn more and think it would show up better in google (where I located this article too) if you wrote more on this. Thanks

Just wanted to say that I read your blog quite frequently and I’m always amazed at some of the stuff people post here. But keep up the good work, it’s always interesting.

The idea article it seems to redeem a lot potential customers. On the internet support it? This item provides great particular distort in relation to important issues. I suppose suffering from nearly anything correct along with tremendous supply information about is an essential task.

Amaze! Thank you! I constantly wished to produce in my internet site a thing like that. Can I take element of the publish to my blog?

Of course, what a splendid website and educative posts, I surely will bookmark your website.Have an awsome day!

You actually make it seem so easy with your presentation but I find this matter to be actually something that I think I would never understand. It seems too complex and extremely broad for me. I’m looking forward for your next post, I’ll try to get the hang of it!

Of course, what a great site and revealing posts, I definitely will bookmark your site.Best Regards!

When alive ,we may probably offend some people.However, we must think about whether they are deserved offended.

Magnificent web site. Plenty of useful info here. I am sending it to a few friends ans also sharing in delicious. And certainly, thanks for your sweat!

Woah! I’m really loving the template/theme of this blog. It’s simple, yet effective. A lot of times it’s very hard to get that “perfect balance” between superb usability and visual appeal. I must say you have done a excellent job with this. In addition, the blog loads super quick for me on Internet explorer. Superb Blog!

I’m agitated all these article directories. It sure would be nice to have every article directory that instantly accepts articles.

I am glad to be one of many visitors on this great site (:, thankyou for putting up.

I was examining some of your blog posts on this internet site and I think this internet site is really informative ! Retain putting up.

Have you had difficulties with spammers? I also use Weblog Engine and I have some helpful anti-spam practices; please mail me if you can be interested in an alternate of ideas.

cool thanks for Reisadvies sharing! btw are there feeds to your blog? I want to add them to my reader Finnaly i discovered your postkeep blogging Damn ! I just found an error in your website! Check if css is managed right!

There is visibly a bunch to know about this. I assume you made some nice points in features also.

Good sharing of concept here in whatever way thanks for posting valueble information..before I possibly could thank allowed coment on your blog, I buy plenty of information within you, If only I could be even more information of your stuff .

I’ve said that least 1986996 times. The problem this like that is they are just too compilcated for the average bird, if you know what I mean

Very good publish.Like exciting read and information, thanks for sharing this publish, I??ve already bookmarked your blog. I can see that you are putting a lot of time and effort into your weblog and detailed articles!

I don’t unremarkably comment but I gotta tell regards for the post on this amazing one :D.

Hi, where did you get this info can you please support this with some proof or you may say some good reference as I and others will really appreciate

Very interesting details you have remarked, thank you for posting.

cool post! very helpful… thanks for the great worrk.

online dating usernames for men says:

I wanted to make sure i commented on this subject.
I am enjoying your dicussion.

2000

Your comment may be no longer than 2,000 characters, approximately 400 words. HTML tags are not permitted, nor are more than two URLs per comment. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments.

Thank You!

Thank you for subscribing to the Tablet Magazine Daily Digest.
Please tell us about you.

No Prize

A new biography charts Joseph Pulitzer’s path from immigrant cub reporter to newspaper magnate and boss from hell

More on Tablet:

Kerry Links Rise of ISIS With Failed Peace Talks

By Lee Smith — Secretary of State: ‘I see a lot of heads nodding’