Your email is not valid
Recipient's email is not valid
Submit Close

Your email has been sent.

Click here to send another

Cross Pollination

How the figure of Jesus came to be employed in modern Jewish art

Print Email

He thought it would be Good for the Jews. That’s what led Max Liebermann, assimilated German Jew and well-respected realist painter, to plot out a radical new take on a well-known passage from the Gospel of Saint Luke.

The scene, in which Joseph and Mary lose track of Jesus, only to find their precocious preadolescent debating with the elders in the Temple, had been depicted over the course of Western art history by everyone from Giotto to Fra Angelico to Rembrandt. Some, like the Italian Lodovico Mazzolino, signaled the Jewish setting through the interiors, showing a relief of Moses and Hebrew writing. Others, like Dürer, indulged in anti-Semitic caricature, treating each elder’s nose as a tour de force of grotesque.

The 12-Year-Old Jesus in the Temple

Max Liebermann (1847–1935), Der zwölfjährige Jesus im Tempel, 1879
Copyright Hamburger Kunsthalle / bpk; photo: Elke Walford.

Liebermann, though, went for naturalism. He based the architecture in his 1879 painting The 12-Year-Old Jesus in the Temple on sketches he had made in synagogues in Amsterdam and Venice. He clothed the elders—a mix of Orthodox and assimilated German Jews—in contemporary Jewish garb. And the youthful Jesus was also, clearly, a Jewish boy—and a ragged urchin with bare feet, to boot.

At a time when the idea of the Jewish Jesus was just taking hold in intellectual circles, Liebermann’s image of the savior as a ragamuffin came as a shock. When the painting debuted in Munich’s Second Annual International Art Exhibition of 1879, the Catholic clergy complained. The prince regent himself demanded it be moved to a less prominent location. Months later, the charges of blasphemy, tinged with anti-Semitism, were still going strong, surfacing in a debate in Parliament.

Liebermann responded by repainting Jesus in an Italianate style suitable for German tastes, with Gentile features, golden tresses, and immaculate historical robes. That is the image we see today in the painting, which was eventually acquired by the Hamburger Kunsthalle—twice. The museum explains why in “The Jesus Scandal,” an inventive exhibition marking the 75th anniversary of the artist’s death that recounts the genesis, reception, repainting, and subsequent peregrinations of Liebermann’s artwork. It includes preparatory sketches, works on the theme by such other artists as Rembrandt and Menzel, and documentation of the scandal at the Munich exhibition.

The exhibition’s final section shows what happened next. A few years after the scandal, Liebermann traded the work to artist Fritz von Uhde. It was exhibited several times, changed hands, and was acquired by the Kunsthalle in 1911. There it resided until 1941, when, because it did not conform to National Socialist criteria, the museum traded it to a dealer for more politically correct art. Years later, museum staff tracked the picture down. And in 1989, they finally reacquired it.

That picture, along with paintings by the Galician-born artist Maurycy Gottlieb (see first slide below) and a sculpture by Russia’s Mark Antokolsky, are the earliest works in an audacious, fascinating subgenre: the Jewish Jesus. In the late 19th century, as Ziva Amishai-Maisels has amply documented, these depictions were intended as propaganda for the Jewish community, an effort to help combat anti-Semitism through art. By reminding Christians that Jesus was an upstanding, influential, and Jewish teacher, these artists hoped they could remind audiences that those who oppressed Jews were attacking their savior’s own kind.

During the Holocaust, Jesus again began to appear in Jewish art—not so often as a preacher this time, but on the cross, as a stand-in for all the victims. Marc Chagall, most famously and controversially, made a long series of tragic, visceral Jewish crucifixion scenes, including some that are still being discovered. Other Jewish artists, including Mané Katz, Louise Nevelson, Adoph Gottlieb, and the German-born Mexican immigrant Mathias Goeritz, also linked the crucifixion to what was happening in the camps. In the work of contemporary artists Helène Aylon and Adi Nes, Jewish Jesus is more ambiguous. No longer merely an innocent victim, he is pressed into a more critical reading of the Bible and Jewish history.

Last week, London’s Ben Uri Gallery took the Jewish appropriation of the crucifixion into new territory when it opened the show “Cross Purposes.” Subtitled “Shock and Contemplation in Images of the Crucifixion,” it is made up of 21 images by artists ranging from Eric Gill and Duncan Grant to Lee Miller and Tracey Emin. It also includes work by three Jews: Chagall, Michael Rothstein, and Emmanuel Levy.

Not everyone liked the idea of a Jewish museum doing a show on an image that’s caused so much violence toward Jews. “Cross Purposes” was received by some, Jews and well as Christians, with “various degrees of concern from puzzlement to outrage,” says David J. Glasser, the museum’s executive co-chair, who on opening night found himself on the street with Sir Norman Rosenthal, a well-known British curator, explaining the exhibition’s thesis to a perturbed crowd. “The concern and anger seem principally to be based on the presumption that we as a proud Jewish Museum of Art should not under any circumstances address the crucifixion in any manner at all.”

The intent, Glasser says, was to trace the evolution of crucifixion iconography from a sacred image to a “universal generic motif” used by artists of all faiths to express opinions on not only religious but also social and political issues. For Gilbert Spencer, for example, it was the labor movement; for Duncan Grant, gay rights. So, rather than Judaizing the crucifixion, the show is in a sense attempting to de-Christianize it.

The underlying impulse, though, seems to relate to Liebermann’s: that reclaiming the crucifixion could somehow be good for the Jews.

Robin Cembalest is executive editor of ARTnews.

Print Email

Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180

Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.

Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.

We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.

yehudah cohn says:

great piece on a fascinating subject!

Teresa Stokes says:

I was at the Private View of the Cross Purposes exhibition and I wouldn’t describe as “perturbed” the crowd listening to Sir Norman Rosenthal. He gave a fascinating speech for over ten minutes entirely off the cuff, and although it was very long the crowd listened in rapt attention throughout. I found myself wishing I had brought a little dictaphone to record it for posterity. We were on the street on a beautiful evening because there were far too many people to squeeze into the gallery. I didn’t personally hear a word of criticism about the exhibition from anyone attending, and I expect that all the complainers are people who have not and probably would not actually come and see it.

My main point in labeling Jesus and the disciples with their Hebrew names was the startling sight of Hebrew letters on a Christian symbol. And why not? As I write in the plaque, Jesus would have died in the Spanish Inquisition or the Crusades or the Holocaust had he been born in those times, in those geographies, because Jesus was a Jew.
(Go to the 3rd and 4th slide of the slide show.)
My reason for inserting asterisks between the disciples in the second Last Supper piece, is to indicate that The Last Supper was the traditional Seder- but without the presence of female relatives.

virginia says:

Let us not forget the telephone company which gave us the subliminal gift of the tllephone pole many years ago.

Notice how Maurycy Gottlieb has tried once again to put distance between the Khazars [Pharisees] who claimed to be Jews, but who were in reality Babylonian Priests and their damnable Mishna and Talmud, which Jesus condemned as the basis of their teaching as the Commandments of G-D the traditions of men.

You folks forget that the Prophet Yeremiah recorded – 1:5 – that G-D had told him that he was “foreordained to be a prophet to the nations”, which if true, means that the historic Jewish claim of being the chosen people of G-d cannot be true. For if Yeremiah was indeed a prophet to the nations, then the chosen people would eventually involve the Goys, which is what the gospel is all about, in the first place..?

Awesome! I have never seen such a nice work done. I just love it.

If you [Tablet, Nextbook] were to make the type/font of the text of your website sections larger, and bold, it would be far be easier for everyone, including people who wear corrective lenses, &/or middle aged, older middle aged, seniors and elderly website viewers.
It’s good to keep in mind that websites are designed as a visual communications format. Small, type defeats the purpose. Thanks.

I would like to add that in case you do not surely have an insurance policy or maybe you do not remain in any group insurance, you may well benefit from seeking the aid of a health insurance agent. Self-employed or people who have medical conditions ordinarily seek the help of one health insurance agent. Thanks for your blog post./wp-login.php?action=registerThanks for your article. I would also love to say that a health insurance brokerage also works well with the benefit of the particular coordinators of any group insurance policy. The health insurance agent is given a listing of benefits searched for by somebody or a group coordinator. Such a broker does indeed is hunt for individuals or perhaps coordinators which best go with those needs. Then he shows his recommendations and if all parties agree, this broker formulates a legal contract between the 2 parties./wp-login.php?action=registerI’d also like to mention that most of those that find themselves without the need of health insurance usually are students, self-employed and people who are unemployed. More than half of those uninsured are under the age of 35. They do not feel they are wanting health insurance because they’re young in addition to healthy. The income is typically spent on houses, food, along with entertainment. Lots of people that do represent the working class either whole or part-time are not supplied insurance by means of their jobs so they head out without as a result of rising valuation on health insurance in the us. Thanks for the concepts you talk about through your blog./wp-login.php?action=registerThanks for the ideas you reveal through this site. In addition, many young women which become pregnant do not even aim to get medical care insurance because they are full of fearfulness they probably would not qualify. Although a few states at this point require that insurers offer coverage no matter the pre-existing conditions. Fees on these kinds of guaranteed plans are usually greater, but when taking into consideration the high cost of medical care it may be a new safer strategy to use to protect the financial future.

cool blog and nice post.

I’ve said that least 2147897 times. The problem this like that is they are just too compilcated for the average bird, if you know what I mean

naturally like your website but you need to check the spelling on several of your posts. Several of them are rife with spelling problems and I find it very bothersome to tell the truth nevertheless I will definitely come back again.


Your comment may be no longer than 2,000 characters, approximately 400 words. HTML tags are not permitted, nor are more than two URLs per comment. We reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments.

Thank You!

Thank you for subscribing to the Tablet Magazine Daily Digest.
Please tell us about you.

Cross Pollination

How the figure of Jesus came to be employed in modern Jewish art

More on Tablet:

Wolf Blitzer Explores His Jewish Roots

By David Meir Grossman — CNN host visits Yad Vashem and Auschwitz for the network’s ‘Roots’ series