Same Old Stories
Tired headlines set the scene for Eytan Fox’s Walk on Water
On an ordinary day, it’s unlikely that the New York Times‘ placement of an article about Israeli land seizures in East Jerusalem next to one on the U.N. remembrance of the liberation of Auschwitz would have caught my eye. But I had just watched an advance copy of Walk on Water, an Israeli film opening here in March that follows Eyal, an undercover Mossad agent sent out to assassinate an infirm ex-Nazi. Along the way, he insults a sweet-faced Palestinian and condescends to a pair of German siblings whose sympathy for the Arabs he derides as hypocritical.
While marred at times by stilted dialogue, among other flaws, Eytan Fox‘s film captures a sense of exhaustion, even ennui, that surrounds anything Holocaust-related. The unflinching Eyal tries to convince his boss, a refugee, to drop this mission, telling him resignedly, “Let’s be honest here. No one gives a damn anymore.” But he also embraces a viewpoint shared by many: Israeli treatment of Palestinians is not tantamount to the German treatment of Jews, and Jews bear no special responsibility toward the Palestinians, or to anyone, for that matter, because of the treatment they endured at the hand of the Germans.
I don’t see myself in Eyal’s camp, and I surprised myself in noticing the articles’ juxtaposition on page A4. When your job is to scan all Jewish-related news, the dizzying number of dispatches about concentration camps and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict can be a terrific soporific. What roused me this time was dismay at the possibility that, just thumbing through the pages of the paper, you can make out these tired shadows, and that mainstream news about Jews offers so little beyond them.
Daily rate: $2
Monthly rate: $18
Yearly rate: $180
WAIT, WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY TO COMMENT?
Tablet is committed to bringing you the best, smartest, most enlightening and entertaining reporting and writing on Jewish life, all free of charge. We take pride in our community of readers, and are thrilled that you choose to engage with us in a way that is both thoughtful and thought-provoking. But the Internet, for all of its wonders, poses challenges to civilized and constructive discussion, allowing vocal—and, often, anonymous—minorities to drag it down with invective (and worse). Starting today, then, we are asking people who'd like to post comments on the site to pay a nominal fee—less a paywall than a gesture of your own commitment to the cause of great conversation. All proceeds go to helping us bring you the ambitious journalism that brought you here in the first place.
I NEED TO BE HEARD! BUT I DONT WANT TO PAY.
Readers can still interact with us free of charge via Facebook, Twitter, and our other social media channels, or write to us at email@example.com. Each week, we’ll select the best letters and publish them in a new letters to the editor feature on the Scroll.
We hope this new largely symbolic measure will help us create a more pleasant and cultivated environment for all of our readers, and, as always, we thank you deeply for your support.